Purpose: To evaluate the potential differences in characteristics of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) stratified by stent design with a focus on the swirling flow-inducing BioMimics 3D helical centerline stent. Methods: Patients with ISR of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries undergoing reintervention were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the angiographic localization and extent of restenosis or reocclusion with the following five different stent systems: SMART Control stent, Supera peripheral stent, GORE^® VIABAHN^® endoprosthesis, BioMimics 3D stent, and Zilver^® PTX^® stent. Results: 414 ISR lesions were analyzed, affecting 236 Supera stents, 67 BioMimics 3D stents, 48 Zilver^® PTX^® stents, 38 SMART Control stents, and 25 VIABAHN^® endoprostheses. The mean stent diameter and length were 5.7 ± 0.77 mm and 121.4 ± 94.8 mm, respectively. ISR included 310 (74.9%) lesions with 1 stent, 89 (21.5%) lesions with 2 stents, 14 (3.4%) lesions with 3 stents, and 1 lesion (0.2%) with 4 stents. Most lesions presented as reocclusions (67.4%) rather than focal (13.3%) or diffuse restenoses (19.3%). No significant differences in ISR lesion morphology were found. By trend, BioMimics 3D stent lesion extension was more focal (16.4% versus 12.7%, p = 0.258), with the highest proportion of lesions in which only the proximal stent third was affected (9.0% versus 5.8%, p = 0.230), as compared to the average of the other four devices. The occlusion rate was the second lowest for the BioMimics 3D stent (64.2 vs. 68.0%, p = 0.316). Risk factors for restenosis or occlusion were active smoking, pre-interventional occlusion, and popliteal intervention. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the helical centerline stent design of the BioMimics 3D stent, which results in a swirling flow with increased wall shear stress, may offer protective properties over straight stent designs, including DES and endoprosthesis, regarding localization and extension of restenosis. Prospective, randomized studies are warranted.

Background: In addition to manual compression, various vascular closure devices (VCD) are available to seal the puncture site following arterial vascular procedures. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the extravascular MYNX CONTROL closure system for achieving primary hemostasis after femoral arterial access following peripheral arterial procedures, compared to the intravascular FemoSeal Aclosure system. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent endovascular intervention between April and November 2022 was performed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of significant puncture site complication defined as a complication resulting in medical treatment. Secondary endpoints included peri-interventional incidence of hematoma, peri-interventional changes in hemoglobin, incidence of emergency diagnostics and predictors for closure system failure. Results: Five hundred and forty-eight patients were included in this analysis. False aneurysm occurred in 18/273 cases (6.6%) following the use of the MYNX closure system, compared to 6/275 cases after using the FemoSeal closure system (2.2%, p = 0.006). The incidence of post-interventional hematoma was not significantly different (28 (10.3%) in the MYNX group versus 32 (11.6%) in the FemoSeal group, p = 0.358). Peri-interventional hemoglobin drop did not differ between groups (p = 0.449). Emergency diagnostics were not significantly performed more often in the MYNX group (14 (5.1%) versus 8 (2.9%), p = 0.134). A post-interventional duplex sonography showed stenosis at the puncture site in one patient after use of the MYNX system. For the entire cohort, oral anticoagulation was the only predictor for the failure of the closure device (p = 0.036). Conclusions: Device failure was more common after using the extravascular MYNX CONTROL system than after using the intravascular FemoSeal system. However, the need for surgical or interventional therapy due to device failure was low.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in all patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease in real world practice. Methods: Consecutive patients treated with CDT between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary endpoint was the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) until discharge. Secondary endpoints included interventional success, predictors for SAEs, bleeding and reperfusion edema/compartment syndrome, limb salvage, and clinical outcomes including target lesion revascularization rate (TLR). Results: Overall, 1238 patients were treated with CDT. SAEs occurred in 511 (41.3%) of the patients, 314 (25.4%) being bleeding complications. There were 95 cases of reperfusion edema/compartment syndrome. Forty-two patients underwent amputation and 33 patients (2.7%) died. CDT was successful in 1177 cases (95.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, abciximab and alprostadil usage, and lysis duration as predictors for SAEs and the use of abciximab as a predictor of reperfusion edema/compartment syndrome. Predictors for bleeding were age, alprostadil usage, and lysis duration. At 12 and 24 months, the limb salvage rate was 91.6% and 88.8%, and TLR rate was 46% and 57.2%, respectively. Conclusions: CDT is an effective endovascular method for the treatment of thrombotic peripheral artery occlusions but is associated with a high complication rate. For SAEs in general and bleeding specifically, increasing age, alprostadil use, and lysis duration were independent risk factors.

Summary: Background: To assess the mid-term outcome of endovascular treatment for popliteal artery restenosis. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included patients with peripheral artery disease (Rutherford class (RC) 2–5) and popliteal artery restenosis treated between January 2007 and December 2017. Patients were classified into four groups based on lesion extent: isolated popliteal lesions and lesions extending to femoral and/or below-the-knee arteries (BTK). The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included TLR at 24 months, changes in RC, ankle-brachial index (ABI), amputation and mortality rates. Results: A total of 332 patients were analyzed. Ninety-two patients received popliteal treatment only (group I), in 81 patients lesion extended into the femoral artery (group II), 112 lesions extended into the BTK arteries (group III), and 47 lesions involved both, femoral and BTK arteries (group IV). At 12 months, the overall TLR rate was 34.6%, with no significant differences between subgroups. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty showed a significant benefit during the first 12 months (p = .035), but this advantage was not sustained thereafter (p = .798). TLR rates did not differ significantly between patients treated with stent angioplasty and those without stenting (p = .087). Significant improvements in ABI and RC were observed in all groups. Major amputation rates were 0.9% at 12 months and 1.8% at 24 months. Mortality rates were 1.5% and 7.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Reintervention rate after endovascular treatment of popliteal artery restenosis is high. The potential benefits of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and stent angioplasty require further clarification through prospective studies.