Georgios Konstantis

Dr. Georgios Konstantis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 September 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGeorgios Konstantis
Georgios Konstantis
GTGeorgia Tsaousi
Georgia Tsaousi
EKElisavet Kitsikidou
Elisavet Kitsikidou
Dimitris ZacharoulisDimitris Zacharoulis
Dimitris Zacharoulis
CPChryssa Pourzitaki
Chryssa Pourzitaki
Background: Gastric and colorectal carcinomas are associated with increased mortality and an increasing incidence worldwide, while surgical resection remains the primary approach for managing these conditions. Emerging evidence suggests that the immunosuppression induced by the chosen anaesthesia approach, during the perioperative period, can have a significant impact on the immune system and consequently the prognosis of these patients. Aim: This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarize the existing literature on the effects of different anaesthesia techniques on immune system responses, focusing on cellular immunity in patients undergoing the surgical removal of gastric or colorectal carcinomas. There is no meta-analysis investigating anaesthesia’s impact on immune responses in gastric and colorectal cancer surgery. Anaesthesia is a key perioperative factor, yet its significance in this area has not been thoroughly investigated. The clinical question of how the anaesthetic technique choice affects the immune system and prognosis remains unresolved. Methods: Major electronic databases were searched up to February 2023 to May 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The study protocol has been registered with Prospero (CRD42023441383). Results: Six RCTs met the selection criteria. Among these, three RCTs investigated the effects of volatile-based anaesthesia versus total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), while the other three RCTs compared general anaesthesia alone to the combination of general anaesthesia with epidural anaesthesia. According to our analysis, there were no significant differences between TIVA and volatile-based anaesthesia, in terms of primary and secondary endpoints. The combination of general anaesthesia with epidural analgesia had a positive impact on NK cell counts (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.94, I2 0.0% at 24 and 72 h after the operation), as well as on CD4+ cells (SMD 0.59, CI 95% 0.26 to 0.93, I2 0.0%). However, the CD3+ cell count, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), IL-6 and TNF-α levels remained unaffected. Conclusions: The combination of epidural analgesia and general anaesthesia can potentially improve, postoperatively, the NK cell count and CD4+ cell levels in gastric or colon surgery patients. However, the specific impact of TIVA or volatile-based anaesthesia remains uncertain. To gain a better understanding of the immunomodulatory effects of anaesthesia, in this particular group of cancer patients, further well-designed trials are required.

27 May 2024 in Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vasilis Spyridon TseriotisVasilis Spyridon Tseriotis
Vasilis Spyridon Tseriotis
Theodoros MavridisTheodoros Mavridis
Theodoros Mavridis
KEKyriaki Eleftheriadou
Kyriaki Eleftheriadou
GKGeorgios Konstantis
Georgios Konstantis
David-Dimitris ChlorogiannisDavid-Dimitris Chlorogiannis
David-Dimitris Chlorogiannis
SKSpiros Konitsiotis
Spiros Konitsiotis

16 October 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGeorgios Konstantis
Georgios Konstantis
GTGeorgia Tsaousi
Georgia Tsaousi
CPChryssa Pourzitaki
Chryssa Pourzitaki
EKElisavet Kitsikidou
Elisavet Kitsikidou
Dimitrios E. MagouliotisDimitrios E. Magouliotis
Dimitrios E. Magouliotis
JRJassin Rashidi
Jassin Rashidi
Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) mostly occurs when there is an acute insult to the liver in patients with pre-existing liver disease, and it is characterized by a high mortality rate. Various therapeutic approaches have been used thus far, with orthotopic liver transplantation being the only definitive cure. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have investigated the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize bone marrow-derived stem cells. Some studies have suggested that G-CSF may have a significant role in the management and survival of patients with ACLF. However, the results are conflicting, and the efficacy of G-CSF still needs to be confirmed. Aim: The aim was to assess the efficacy of G-CSF in patients with ACLF. Methods: Electronic databases were searched until May 2023 for randomized controlled trials investigating the use of G-CSF in adult patients with ACLF. Outcome measures were the effects of G-CSF on overall survival, changes in liver disease severity scores, complications of cirrhosis, other G-CSF-related adverse effects, and all-cause mortality. The study’s protocol has been registered with Prospero (CRD42023420273). Results: Five double-blind randomized controlled trials involving a total of 421 participants met the inclusion criteria. The use of G-CSF demonstrated a significant effect on overall survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, and I2 48%), leading to a decreased mortality (LogOR-0.97, 95% CI −1.57 to −0.37, and I2 37.6%) and improved Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (SMD −0.87, 95% CI −1.62 to −0.13, and I2 87.3%). There was no correlation between the improvement of the Child–Pugh score and the use of G-CSF(SMD −2.47, 95% CI −5.78 to 0.83, and I2 98.1%). The incidence of complications of cirrhosis did not decrease significantly with G-CSF treatment (rate ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.01, and I2 90%). A qualitative synthesis showed that the use of G-CSF is safe. Conclusions: The administration of G-CSF has demonstrated a positive impact on overall survival, liver function, and the MELD score. The presence of heterogeneity in the included studies prohibits conclusive recommendations.

22 October 2025 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGeorgios Konstantis
Georgios Konstantis
MPMoritz Passenberg
Moritz Passenberg
CGClara Guntlisbergen
Clara Guntlisbergen
ASAndreas Schütte
Andreas Schütte
BJBjörn Jung
Björn Jung
JRJassin Rashidi
Jassin Rashidi
Background: Cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction (CAID) is characterized by a dysregulated immune response involving both systemic inflammation and immunosuppression, frequently culminating in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). The IL-23/IL-17 signaling axis is a key inflammatory pathway implicated in various immune-mediated diseases, yet its specific role in cirrhosis remains poorly understood. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we analyzed circulating levels of IL-23, IL-17A, IL-17E, IL-17F, IL-1β, and IL-1RA in 127 patients with compensated cirrhosis, acute decompensation (AD), or ACLF in the absence of active infection. Cytokines were quantified by ELISA and correlated with disease severity, organ dysfunction, and clinical outcomes. Multivariable ordinal and multinomial regression analyses were performed to assess associations between cytokines and cirrhosis progression. Results: Levels of IL-17F, IL-23, and IL-1β levels were significantly lower in patients with AD and ACLF compared to those with compensated cirrhosis. In contrast, IL-17A, IL-17E, and IL-1RA levels remained largely unchanged. IL-17F was independently associated with reduced odds of progression to AD or ACLF, suggesting a possible protective role. IL-17F also retained an inverse association with disease severity in adjusted ordinal regression models. Conclusion: IL-17F expression declines progressively with increasing severity of liver disease, independently of IL-17A. These findings support a distinct, possibly immunoregulatory role for IL-17F in cirrhosis progression, and warrant further mechanistic investigation into its functional relevance as a biomarker for disease stratification or as a therapeutic target.

12 July 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGeorgios Konstantis
Georgios Konstantis
IKIlias Katsadouros
Ilias Katsadouros
GTGeorgia Tsaousi
Georgia Tsaousi
VGVasileios Grosomanidis
Vasileios Grosomanidis
CPChryssa Pourzitaki
Chryssa Pourzitaki
Background and Objectives: Lung cancer represents one of the principal causes of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. Despite the numerous novel therapeutic agents, surgical resection remains, in many cases, the mainstay treatment. A growing body of evidence indicates that the anesthetic technique of choice contributes to perioperative immunosuppression, thus having an impact on cancer recurrence and prognosis. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a thorough summary of the current literature regarding the modulation of the immune response induced by the various anesthetic techniques that are used in lung cancer surgery, with a particular emphasis on cellular immunity. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases were systematically searched from November 2023 up to March 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the eligibility criteria. Results: A total of seven RCTs were included. Four of the RCTs compared the administration of general anesthesia alone versus general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. The subsequent meta-analysis showed that the combination of general and epidural anesthesia exerted a positive impact on the cell counts of the CD3+ cells (SMD −0.42, 95% Cl −0.70 to −0.13 24 h postoperatively and SMD −0.86 95% Cl −1.48 to −0.23 72 h postoperatively), the CD4+ cells (SMD −0.41 95% Cl −0.69 to −0.12 at the end of surgery and SMD −0.56 95% Cl −0.85 to −0.27 72 h later), and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio (SMD −0.31 95% Cl −0.59 to −0.02 immediately after surgery, SMD −0.50 95% Cl −0.86 to −0.14 24 h postoperatively, and SMD −0.60 95% Cl −0.89 to −0.31 72 h later). The pooled results regarding CD8+ and NK cell counts were inconclusive. The remaining three studies compared volatile-based anesthesia with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Due to disparities between these studies, qualitative analysis was inconclusive, whereas quantitative analysis was not feasible. Conclusions: The supplementation of general anesthesia with epidural anesthesia favorably impacts CD3+ and CD4+ cell counts, as well as the CD4+/CD8+ ratio. The present results and the effects of anesthetic technique on other immune cells must be consolidated with further high-quality studies.