Michal Šyc

Dr. Michal Šyc

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2020 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDominik Blasenbauer
Dominik Blasenbauer
FHFlorian Huber
Florian Huber
JLJakob Lederer
Jakob Lederer
Margarida QuinaMargarida Quina
Margarida Quina
DBDenise Blanc-Biscarat
Denise Blanc-Biscarat
JFJohann Fellner
Johann Fellner
Almost 500 municipal solid waste incineration plants in the EU, Norway and Switzerland generate about 17.6 Mt/a of incinerator bottom ash (IBA). IBA contains minerals and metals. Metals are mostly separated and sold to the scrap market and minerals are either disposed of in landfills or utilised in the construction sector. Since there is no uniform regulation for IBA utilisation at EU level, countries developed own rules with varying requirements for utilisation. As a result from a cooperation network between European experts an up-to-date overview of documents regulating IBA utilisation is presented. Furthermore, this work highlights the different requirements that have to be considered. Overall, 51 different parameters for the total content and 36 different parameters for the emission by leaching are defined. An analysis of the defined parameter reveals that leaching parameters are significantly more to be considered compared to total content parameters. In order to assess the leaching behaviour nine different leaching tests, including batch tests, up-flow percolation tests and one diffusion test (monolithic materials) are in place. A further discussion of leaching parameters showed that certain countries took over limit values initially defined for landfills for inert waste and adopted them for IBA utilisation. The overall utilisation rate of IBA in construction works is approximately 54 wt%. It is revealed that the rate of utilisation does not necessarily depend on how well regulated IBA utilisation is, but rather seems to be a result of political commitment for IBA recycling and economically interesting circumstances.

1 July 2020 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MŠMichal Šyc
Michal Šyc
Franz-Georg SimonFranz-Georg Simon
Franz-Georg Simon
JHJiri Hykš
Jiri Hykš
RBRoberto Braga
Roberto Braga
LBLaura Biganzoli
Laura Biganzoli
MGMario Grosso
Mario Grosso
Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) is one of the leading technologies for municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment in Europe. Incineration bottom ash (IBA) is the main solid residue from MSWI, and its annual European production is about 20 million tons. The composition of IBA depends on the composition of the incinerated waste; therefore, it may contain significant amounts of ferrous and non-ferrous (NFe) metals as well as glass that can be recovered. Technologies for NFe metals recovery have emerged in IBA treatment since the 1990s and became common practice in many developed countries. Although the principles and used apparatus are nearly the same in all treatment trains, the differences in technological approaches to recovery of valuable components from IBA - with a special focus on NFe metals recovery - are summarized in this paper.

25 July 2013 in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMiloslav Hartman
Miloslav Hartman
KSKarel Svoboda
Karel Svoboda
MPMichael Pohořelý
Michael Pohořelý
MŠMichal Šyc
Michal Šyc

1 February 2012 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MŠMichal Šyc
Michal Šyc
MPMichael Pohořelý
Michael Pohořelý
PKPetra Kameníková
Petra Kameníková
JHJan Habart
Jan Habart
KSKarel Svoboda
Karel Svoboda
MPMiroslav Punčochář
Miroslav Punčochář

1 March 2018 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MŠMichal Šyc
Michal Šyc
AKAneta Krausová
Aneta Krausová
PKPetra Kameníková
Petra Kameníková
RŠRadovan Šomplák
Radovan Šomplák
MPMartin PAVLAS
Martin PAVLAS
MPMiroslav Punčochář
Miroslav Punčochář

1 December 2017 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MJMichal Jeremiáš
Michal Jeremiáš
MPMichael Pohořelý
Michael Pohořelý
KSK. Svoboda
K. Svoboda
VMVasilije Manovic
Vasilije Manovic
Edward AnthonyEdward Anthony
Edward Anthony
MŠMichal Šyc
Michal Šyc
Steam can be fully or partially substituted by CO2 as a gasification agent. This substitution affects producer gas composition, char conversion and in-situ tar reforming. Here, wood chips were gasified in a spouting fluidised bed using silica sand and catalytic dolomitic lime as the bed material at 850 °C. The use of a gasifying agent composed of CO2 and H2O was compared to the use of CO2 or H2O alone. It was found that mixtures of CO2 and H2O as the gasifying agent improve char conversion, and that the combined gasification agents are very effective in ensuring the decomposition/destruction of tars when lime based materials are used in the fluidised bed