Background: We conducted an in vitro comparison of the snare loop reinforcement against a closed-loop reinforcement (Hungaroring) for physician-modified endograft (PMEG) fenestrations regarding preparation time and stability during flaring balloon dilatation. Materials and methods: The time to complete a PMEG fenestration with reinforcement was measured and compared between the Hungaroring and snare loop groups. The number of stitches was counted. Each fenestration was dilated using a 10 mm high-pressure, non-compliant balloon up to 21 atm in pressure, and fluoroscopic images were taken. The presence of indentation on the oversized balloon at the level of the reinforcement was evaluated at each fenestration. Results: Five fenestrations were created in each group (n = 5) for a total of ten pieces. The completion time in the snare loop group was 1070 s (IQR:1010–1090) compared to 760 s (IQR:685–784) in the Hungaroring group (p = 0.008). Faster completion time was achieved by faster stitching (23.2 s/stitch (IQR 22.8–27.3) for the snare loop group and 17.3 s/stitch (IQR 17.3–20.1) for the Hungaroring group (p = 0.016). None of the fluoroscopic images of the snare loop reinforcement showed an indentation on the balloon during the overexpansion; on the contrary, the Hungaroring showed indentation in every case, even at 21 atm. Conclusion: Fenestrations reinforced with Hungaroring can be completed significantly faster. Furthermore, the Hungaroring resists over-dilation even at high pressures, while snare loop reinforcements dilate at nominal pressure.

Background/Objectives: Virtual non-contrast (VNC) images derived from dual-energy CTA (DE-CTA) could potentially replace true non-contrast (TNC) scans while reducing radiation exposure. This study evaluated the image quality of VNC compared to TNC for assessing native arteries and bypass grafts in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 175 patients (111 men, 64 women, mean age: 69.3 ± 9.5 years) with PAD who underwent lower extremity DE-CTA. Mean attenuation and image noise values of TNC and VNC images were measured in native arteries and bypass grafts at six arterial levels, from the aorta to the popliteal arteries, using circular regions of interest (ROI). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. Three independent radiologists evaluated the subjective image quality of VNC images compared to baseline TNC scans for overall quality (4-point Likert scale), and for residual contrast medium (CM), calcium subtractions, and bypass graft visualization (3-point Likert scales). Radiation dose parameters (DLP, CTDIvol) were recorded to estimate effective dose values (ED) and the potential radiation dose reduction. Differences between TNC and VNC measurements and radiation dose parameters were compared using a paired t-test. Interobserver agreement was assessed with Gwet’s AC2. Results: VNC attenuation and noise values were significantly lower across all native arterial levels (p < 0.05, mean difference: 4.7 HU–10.8 HU) and generally lower at all bypass regions (mean difference: 2.2 HU–13.8 HU). Mean image quality scores were 3.03 (overall quality), 2.99 (residual contrast), 2.04 (subtracted calcifications), and 3.0 (graft visualization). Inter-reader agreement was excellent for each assessment (AC2 ≥ 0.81). The estimated radiation dose reduction was 36.8% (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: VNC reconstructions demonstrated comparable image quality to TNC in a PAD assessment and offer substantial radiation dose reduction, supporting their potential as a promising alternative in clinical practice. Further prospective studies and optimization of reconstruction algorithms remain essential to confirm diagnostic accuracy and address remaining technical limitations.

Background: Vascular access site complications (VASCs) after endovascular interventions requiring a large-bore access are frequent and known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although balloon-expandable covered stents (BECSs) are increasingly used in such indications, their performance in this rather hostile territory is currently unknown. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BECSs in common femoral artery (CFA) VASCs management. Methods: This is a national multicenter retrospective study of all patients who underwent BECS implantation of the CFA due to a VASCs after an endovascular procedure between January 2020 and May 2023 in major tertiary referral centers in Hungary. Operative data were collected and follow-up ultrasound examinations were performed. Our study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05220540) and followed the STROBE guidelines. Results: Of the 23 patients enrolled (13 females, mean age: 74.2 ± 8.6), technical success was achieved in 21 (91.3%) cases, with one perioperative death. After an average follow-up of 18.0 ± 11.4 months, another nine (39.1%) deaths occurred, and one was VASCs-associated. BECS occlusion was detected in one (4.3%) patient, being the only reintervention (4.3%) where revascularization was also achieved. Conclusions: Although BECS implantation for CFA VASCs is feasible with a relatively high technical success rate, the mortality rate is non-negligible. Until adequately evaluated, BECS implantation in such indications is to be used with caution, ideally only within the framework of a trial.

Background/Objectives: We sought to demonstrate the versatility and economy of physician-modified endograft (PMEG) fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) based on the Treo (Terumo Aortic) platform for patients referred for custom-made device (CMD) FEVAR due to a complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (CAAA). Endovascular planning was performed utilizing a standardized design incorporating all visceral arteries with a low supra-celiac landing zone. The pure cost of the aortic components was compared between the PMEG and CMD designs. Methods: A total of 39 consecutive patients treated with CMD FEVAR due to a CAAA between September 2018 and December 2023 were recruited at a tertiary vascular center for a retrospective evaluation. Endovascular planning was performed on readily available computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets using 3Mensio Vascular (Pie Medical Imaging) software. The actual cost of the major components was compared between the implanted CMD platform produced by Cook and the planned Treo-based PMEG repair. Results: A total of 155 fenestrations were planned on 3 triple-, 34 quadruple-, and two quintuple-fenestrated devices. The 90 mm distance between the proximal edge and the flow divider of the 120 mm long main body of the Treo graft allowed for the placement of all necessary fenestrations of the target arteries without the need to reduce the 3 cm supra-celiac landing zone while also preserving a safety distance of >1 cm to the flow divider. The costs of the components were EUR 33896 for CMD and EUR 8878 for a PMEG. Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests that a quadruple-fenestrated PMEG based on the Treo bifurcation is a highly versatile alternative with a significant price advantage over custom-made devices for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.