David B Parker

Dr. David B Parker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in Animal Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMByeng R. Min
Byeng R. Min
SSSandra Solaiman
Sandra Solaiman
HWHeidi M. Waldrip
Heidi M. Waldrip
DPDavid B Parker
David B Parker
RTRichard W. Todd
Richard W. Todd
DBDavid Brauer
David Brauer
Methane gas from livestock production activities is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions which have been shown to influence climate change. New technologies offer a potential to manipulate the rumen biome through genetic selection reducing CH4 production. Methane production may also be mitigated to varying degrees by various dietary intervention strategies. Strategies to reduce GHG emissions need to be developed which increase ruminant production efficiency whereas reducing production of CH4 from cattle, sheep, and goats. Methane emissions may be efficiently mitigated by manipulation of natural ruminal microbiota with various dietary interventions and animal production efficiency improved. Although some CH4 abatement strategies have shown efficacy in vivo, more research is required to make any of these approaches pertinent to modern animal production systems. The objective of this review is to explain how anti-methanogenic compounds (e.g., plant tannins) affect ruminal microbiota, reduce CH4 emission, and the effects on host responses. Thus, this review provides information relevant to understanding the impact of tannins on methanogenesis, which may provide a cost-effective means to reduce enteric CH4 production and the influence of ruminant animals on global GHG emissions.

9 October 2021 in Animal Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMByeng R. Min
Byeng R. Min
DPDavid B Parker
David B Parker
DBDavid Brauer
David Brauer
HWHeidi Waldrip
Heidi Waldrip
CLCatherine Lockard
Catherine Lockard
SASimona Augyte
Simona Augyte
Seaweeds are macroalgae, which can be of many different morphologies, sizes, colors, and chemical profiles. They include brown, red, and green seaweeds. Brown seaweeds have been more investigated and exploited in comparison to other seaweed types for their use in animal feeding studies due to their large sizes and ease of harvesting. Recent in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that plant secondary compound-containing seaweeds (e.g., halogenated compounds, phlorotannins, etc.) have the potential to mitigate enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants when added to the diets of beef and dairy cattle. Red seaweeds including Asparagopsis spp. are rich in crude protein and halogenated compounds compared to brown and green seaweeds. When halogenated-containing red seaweeds are used as the active ingredient in ruminant diets, bromoform concentration can be used as an indicator of anti-methanogenic properties. Phlorotannin-containing brown seaweed has also the potential to decrease CH4 production. However, numerous studies examined the possible anti-methanogenic effects of marine seaweeds with inconsistent results. This work reviews existing data associated with seaweeds and in vitro and in vivo rumen fermentation, animal performance, and enteric CH4 emissions in ruminants. Increased understanding of the seaweed supplementation related to rumen fermentation and its effect on animal performance and CH4 emissions in ruminants may lead to novel strategies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions while improving animal productivity.

13 September 2010 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDavid B Parker
David B Parker
ZPZena L. Perschbacher-Buser
Zena L. Perschbacher-Buser
NCN. Andy Cole
N. Andy Cole
Jacek A. KozielJacek A. Koziel
Jacek A. Koziel
Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 µg m−3) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 µg m−3), propionic (15,800 µg m−3), isobutyric (1,686 µg m−3), butyric (1,049 µg m−3), isovaleric (1,236 µg m−3), valeric (643 µg m−3), and hexanoic (2,158 µg m−3) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry.

1 October 2017 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDevin L. Maurer
Devin L. Maurer
Jacek A. KozielJacek A. Koziel
Jacek A. Koziel
KBKelsey Bruning
Kelsey Bruning
DPDavid B Parker
David B Parker

1 February 2017 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDevin L. Maurer
Devin L. Maurer
Jacek A. KozielJacek A. Koziel
Jacek A. Koziel
KBKelsey Bruning
Kelsey Bruning
DPDavid B Parker
David B Parker

1 November 2016 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HWHeidi M. Waldrip
Heidi M. Waldrip
RTRichard W. Todd
Richard W. Todd
DPDavid B Parker
David B Parker
NCN. Andy Cole
N. Andy Cole
CRC. Alan Rotz
C. Alan Rotz
KCKenneth Casey
Kenneth Casey
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from concentrated animal feeding operations, including cattle feedyards, have become an important research topic. However, there are limitations to current measurement techniques, uncertainty in the magnitude of feedyard N2O fluxes, and a lack of effective mitigation methods. The objective of this review was to assess N2O emission from cattle feedyards, including comparison of measured and modeled emission rates, discussion of measurement methods, and evaluation of mitigation options. Published annual per capita flux rates for beef cattle feedyards and open‐lot dairies were highly variable and ranged from 0.002 to 4.3 kg N2O animal−1 yr−1. On an area basis, published emission rates ranged from 0 to 41 mg N2O m−2 h−1. From these studies and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emission factors, calculated daily per capita N2O fluxes averaged 18 ± 10 g N2O animal−1 d−1 (range, 0.04–67 g N2O animal−1 d−1). This variation was due to inconsistency in measurement techniques as well as irregularity in N2O production and emission attributable to management, animal diet, and environmental conditions. Based on this review, it is clear that the magnitude and dynamics of N2O emissions from open‐lot cattle systems are not well understood. Further research is required to quantify feedyard N2O fluxes and develop cost‐effective mitigation methods.Core Ideas: The magnitude of published N2O fluxes from open‐lot cattle systems was highly variable. N2O fluxes varied with measurement methods, management, and environmental conditions. Methods to mitigate feedyard N2O emissions are available but have yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Improved animal performance and reducing N intake are best options to reduce feedyard N2O losses.