A adubação nitrogenada possibilita aumentar a capacidade de suporte das pastagens, entretanto, o uso de elevadas doses pode causar efeitos negativos no crescimento de gramíneas forrageiras. A partir do pressuposto, objetivou-se avaliar a influência de doses crescentes de nitrogênio sob as características morfogênicas e estruturais, acúmulo de biomassa e eficiências de conversão e recuperação do nitrogênio em pastagem de Megathyrsus maximus cv. BRS Zuri. Foram testadas cinco doses de nitrogênio (0, 200, 400, 600 e 800 Kg de nitrogênio/ha) em delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. Foi observado comportamento quadrático para as taxas de alongamento e aparecimento foliar, tempo de vida e o filocrono. Houve aumento no número de perfilhos e na produção de matéria seca quando as plantas foram submetidas à adubação, porém, tanto a eficiência de utilização quanto a recuperação aparente do nitrogênio reduziram linearmente com o aumento do nível de nitrogênio. O uso de fertilizante nitrogenado promoveu melhora nas características morfogênicas (P<0,05) exceto para taxa de alongamento de colmo e taxa de senescência foliar que se mantiveram estáveis. A Adubação com nitrogênio acelera as taxas de crescimento do Megathyrsus maximus cv. BRS Zuri. As respostas máximas nas variáveis morfogênicas, no número de folhas vivas e totais por perfilho são obtidas com doses próximas de 500 kg/ha, enquanto que doses variando de 600 a 647 kg/ha proporcionam maior tamanho de folha por perfilho, densidade populacional de perfilhos e produção de matéria seca. As eficiências de utilização e recuperação do nitrogênio reduzem com o aumento das doses de nitrogênio.

This study evaluated different herbage allowances from mid to late pregnancy on pre- and postpartum physiological responses, milk production, and the performance of Nellore cows and the preweaning growth of their female offspring. Sixty multiparous Nellore cows were blocked by their body weight (BW; 425 ± 36 kg) and body condition score (BCS; 3.67 ± 0.23, scale 1–5) and randomly allocated to twelve pastures. Treatments consisted of two different herbage allowances (HA) during pregnancy: low HA (LHA; 2.80 kg DM/kg of BW) and high HA (HHA; 7.60 kg DM/kg of BW). Both treatment groups were fed 1 g/kg BW of a protein supplement. After calving, all cow–calf pairs were combined in a single group. The effects of maternal treatment × day of the study were detected for herbage mass and allowance, the stocking rate and forage crude protein, and for cow BW, BCS, and carcass measures (p < 0.01). Milk yield corrected to 4% fat, while the levels of fat total solids and cow plasma IGF-1 and urea were different (p ≤ 0.04) between treatments. HHA offspring was heavier (p ≤ 0.05) at 120 days and at weaning. A high herbage allowance can be implemented from mid-gestation until calving to increase cow prepartum performance, post-partum milk yield and composition, and positively modulate female offspring preweaning growth.

Understanding economic scenarios is crucial in all production chains. Tropical pastures are Brazil’s primary food source for beef cattle production, and current pasture management is not ideal due to land degradation. An economic evaluation assists farmers with improving pasture management using novel techniques, such as nitrogen (N) fertilization, which is straightforward and practical. The economic effects of different N fertilizer levels in beef cattle production were evaluated. This study was conducted over three years (2014/2015, 2015/2016, and 2016/2017) using four concentrations of urea fertilizer (0, 90, 180, and 270 kg N/ha). A principal component analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed using financial data. A financial pattern was observed, with increases in some variables, such as cost-effective operating and cost-total operating from those measuring costs and gross revenue, operating profit, and net income from those estimating revenues. Treatment with 180 kg N/ha fertilizer resulted in increased profitability, payback, internal rate of return, and net present value (at 6% and 12% tax) of 17.76%, 2.79 years, 35.79%, and USD 5926.03 and USD 1854.35, respectively. For this study, the main costs associated with profitability were supplementation, animal purchases, and sale prices. The best treatment to achieve excellent grazing pressure in tropical areas with oxisol is 180 kg/ha per year.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) in combination with different feed additives on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, enteric methane (CH₄) emissions, nutrient intake and digestibility, and blood parameters in feedlot beef cattle. In experiment (Exp.) 1, one hundred sixty-eight Nellore bulls (initial bodyweight (BW) 410 ± 8 kg) were allocated to 24 pens in a completely randomized block design. In Exp. 2, thirty Nellore bulls (initial BW 410 ± 3 kg) were allocated to a collective pen as one group, and treatments were allocated in a completely randomized design. Three treatments were applied: Control (CTL): monensin sodium (26 mg/kg of dry matter, DM); M3NOP: CTL with 3-NOP (100 mg/kg DM); and Combo: 3-NOP (100 mg/kg DM) with essential oils (100 mg/kg DM), 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin-D3 (0.10 mg/kg DM), organic chromium (4 mg/kg DM), and zinc (60 mg/kg DM). In Exp. 1, bulls in the Combo group had greater (p < 0.01) dry matter intake (DMI) at d 28 compared to the CTL and M3NOP groups. During d 0 to 102, bulls’ final BW and average daily gain (ADG) were greater (p ≤ 0.03) for the Combo group compared to the CTL. The bulls in the Combo and M3NOP groups had better (p < 0.01) feed conversion (FC) and feed efficiency (FE) compared to the CTL. Hot carcass weight (HCW), carcass ADG, and carcass yield were greater (p ≤ 0.05) for bulls in the Combo group compared to the CTL and M3NOP groups. The bulls in the Combo group had greater (p = 0.01) dressing compared to the M3NOP group. Combo bulls had better (p = 0.02) biological efficiency compared to the CTL. The bulls in the Combo group had lower (p < 0.01) carcass pH compared to the CTL and M3NOP groups. In Exp. 2, bulls in the Combo group had greater (p = 0.04) DMI at d 28 compared to the CTL and had greater (p < 0.01) DMI at d 102 compared to the CTL and M3NOP groups. The bulls in the Combo group had greater (p = 0.04) HCW compared to the CTL and M3NOP groups and carcass ADG was greater (p = 0.04) for bulls in the Combo group compared to the M3NOP group. The bulls in the Combo and M3NOP groups had lower (p < 0.01) CH₄ production (38.8%, g/d), yield (41.1%, g/kg DMI), and intensity (40.8%, g/kg carcass ADG) and higher (p < 0.01) H₂ emissions (291%, g/d) compared to the CTL. Combo bulls had lower (p < 0.01) blood glucose and insulin, and higher nutrient intake and digestibility (p ≤ 0.05) compared to the CTL and M3NOP groups. Combining 3-NOP with different feed additives improved FC and FE, and reduced enteric CH₄ emissions. Combo treatment improved growth performance, carcass traits, nutrient intake, and digestibility, and improved glucose and insulin responses in feedlot beef cattle on a high-concentrate finishing diet.

Two experiments were conducted to assess the effects of water medication technology on beef cattle behaviour and performance in tropical conditions. Experiment 1 involved 30 Droughtmaster yearling steers monitored over seven days in a controlled environment. Feed and water consumptions were monitored with Smart Feed Pro^® systems, with three water treatments administered via uDOSE^® technology. The results indicated an average water intake of 13.6 L/head/d. Experiment 2 had 120 yearling steers from four genetic groups grazing on an extensive pasture system. Throughout four 24-day periods, forage availability and chemical composition were measured once monthly. Experiment 2 revealed a variation in water intake, ranging from 16.2 L/head/d down to 4.75 L/head/d. Notably, the lower intake coincided with a rainfall event documented during the fourth experimental period. Overall, results from both experiments indicated that water medication did not alter cattle water preference. There was no preference for treated water sources in Experiment 1, while differences in Experiment 2 appeared to be influenced by external factors like weather and prior habits. These experiments demonstrate the feasibility of water medication for beef cattle without disruption of their natural behaviour.

The addition of methane-reducing compounds (MRCs) to livestock drinking water presents an alternative method for enteric methane mitigation in extensive systems where these compounds cannot be fed through the diet. This work evaluated several such compounds with the potential to be deployed in this manner. Methane-reducing compounds were selected based on the existing literature and likelihood of dissolution when combined with a commercially available water-based nutrient supplement (uPRO) (uPRO ORANGE^®, DIT AgTech, QLD, Australia). This, in turn, would demonstrate the capacity for MRCs to be administered through animal drinking water when such supplements are in use. This technique requires the analysis of MRC solubility and stability in solution, which was completed via Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy. The uPRO supplement is comprised of urea, urea phosphate, and ammonium sulfate, providing nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur—limiting nutrients for ruminants grazing extensive systems during drier periods of the year. Accordingly, medium-quality Rhodes grass hay was used in fermentation runs to simulate a basal diet during the dry season. Methane-reducing compounds were assessed in accordance with each variable measured (gas/methane production, dry matter digestibility, stability under different environmental conditions) along with existing research in the field to determine the most suitable compound for co-administration. Whilst most compounds examined in this study appeared to retain their structure in solution with uPRO, fermentation results varied in terms of successful methane mitigation. The additive Agolin Ruminant L emerged as the most promising compound for further in vivo investigation.