Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab versus infliximab in an open‐label prospective, comparative, multicenter cohort study of childhood noninfectious chronic uveitis.Methods: Thirty‐three patients (22 females, 11 males, median age 9.17 years) with refractory, vision‐threatening, noninfectious active uveitis were enrolled, and received for at least 1 year infliximab (5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 6–8 weeks) or adalimumab (24 mg/m² every 2 weeks). The primary outcome was to assess, once remission was achieved, the time of a first relapse. Time to remission, time to steroid discontinuation, and the number of relapses were also considered.Results: Sixteen children (12 with juvenile idiopathic arthritis [JIA], 3 with idiopathic uveitis, and 1 with Behçet's disease) were recruited in the adalimumab cohort and 17 children (10 with JIA, 5 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with early‐onset sarcoidosis, and 1 with Behçet's disease) were recruited in the infliximab group. Cox regression analysis did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to time to achieve remission and time to steroid discontinuation, whereas a higher probability of uveitis remission on adalimumab during the time of treatment was shown (Mantel‐Cox χ² = 6.83, P < 0.001). At 40 months of followup, 9 (60%) of 15 children receiving adalimumab compared to 3 (18.8%) of 16 children receiving infliximab were still in remission on therapy (P < 0.02).Conclusion: Even if limited to a relatively small group, our study suggests that over 3 years of treatment, adalimumab is more efficacious than infliximab in maintaining remission of chronic childhood uveitis.

Objective: To report on the clinical response to canakinumab in a patient with sporadic nucleotide‐binding oligomerization domain–containing protein 2 (NOD‐2)–associated pediatric granulomatous arthritis (Blau syndrome) and severe resistant panuveitis, and to describe gene expression profile changes throughout such treatment.Methods: A 4‐year‐old boy was diagnosed as having Blau syndrome on the basis of typical clinical features, histologic evidence of noncaseating granulomas, and a NOD2 mutation. Ocular involvement was initially controlled by topical and oral corticosteroids, but over the years visual impairment and complications, such as macular edema and retinal detachment, progressed. Ocular disease remained persistently active despite treatment with multiple different immunosuppressants; therefore, canakinumab treatment was started. Before and during the first 6 months of treatment, the gene expression profile was determined each month.Results: Canakinumab treatment was well tolerated and led to rapid quiescence of uveitis, which had been continuously active before this treatment. Gene expression profiling analysis of the patient's blood prior to initiation of interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) blockade revealed differential expression of 1,993 transcripts when compared to healthy controls, and among the up‐regulated transcripts, pathway analysis showed that the predominant network consisted of innate immunity–related transcripts. The transcriptional signature of the patient overlapped with the transcriptional signature of patients with systemic‐onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and canakinumab treatment led to the normalization of most of these transcriptional changes.Conclusion: The pathogenesis of Blau syndrome may be mediated by IL‐1, and canakinumab may be useful when this disorder is unresponsive to more conventional treatments.

Nonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how long to continue treatment, and, in case of failure, if switching to another anti-TNF-α strategy might be eventually an option. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα therapy versus Adalimumab used after the failure of a previous anti-TNFα (Infliximab) in an open-label, comparative, multi-center, cohort study of childhood chronic uveitis.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using sodium hyaluronate 0.1% and carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% artificial tears for ocular discomfort and tear-film stability in eyes after cataract surgery. Twenty ophthalmic centers in Italy. Prospective randomized case series. This study enrolled patients scheduled for unilateral cataract surgery. After surgery, patients received artificial tears and a topical steroid-antibiotic (study group) or topical steroid-antibiotic alone (control group) and were assessed postoperatively at 1 and 5 weeks. Outcome measures were tear breakup time (TBUT), ocular surface disease index (OSDI), frequency of dry-eye symptoms evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS), and corneal fluorescein staining. The study comprised 282 patients. At 5 weeks, the mean TBUT was statistically significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (P = .0003). The mean OSDI score statistically significantly improved in both groups from 1 to 5 weeks (P < .0001 for both groups); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups at these timepoints. The artificial tears statistically significantly improved VAS-assessed dry-eye symptoms in the study group compared with the control group at 5 weeks (P < .001). The mean corneal fluorescein staining was significantly reduced in the study group compared with the control group at 5 weeks (P = .002 versus P = .05, respectively). No treatment-related adverse events were reported. Sodium hyaluronate 0.1% and carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% ophthalmic solution was effective and well tolerated in reducing dry-eye disease symptoms and improving the clinical outcome after cataract surgery. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.