Nathaniel Szewczyk

Dr. Nathaniel Szewczyk

Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute; Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 February 2021 in Autophagy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDaniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky
AAAmal Kamal Abdel-Aziz
Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz
SASara Abdelfatah
Sara Abdelfatah
MAMahmoud Abdellatif
Mahmoud Abdellatif
AAAsghar Abdoli
Asghar Abdoli
CTChun-Kit Tong
Chun-Kit Tong

26 April 2013 in The Journal of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DWDaniel J. Wilkinson
Daniel J. Wilkinson
THT. Hossain
T. Hossain
DHD. S. Hill
D. S. Hill
Beth PhillipsBeth Phillips
Beth Phillips
HCH. Crossland
H. Crossland
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
Key points: The branched‐chain amino acid (BCAA) leucine acts as both a ‘trigger’ for the initiation of protein synthesis, and as a substrate for newly synthesized protein. As a BCAA, leucine can be metabolized within skeletal muscle, leaving open the possibility that leucine metabolites might possess anabolic properties. One metabolite in particular, β‐hydroxy‐β‐methylbutyrate (HMB), has shown positive effects on lean body mass and strength following exercise, and in disease‐related muscle wasting, yet its impact on acute human muscle protein turnover is undefined. We report here that HMB stimulates muscle protein synthesis to a similar extent to leucine. HMB was also found to decrease muscle protein breakdown. Our observation that HMB enhances muscle protein anabolism may partly (or wholly) underlie its pre‐defined anabolic/anti‐catabolic supplemental efficacy in humans. Abstract  Maintenance of skeletal muscle mass is contingent upon the dynamic equilibrium (fasted losses–fed gains) in protein turnover. Of all nutrients, the single amino acid leucine (Leu) possesses the most marked anabolic characteristics in acting as a trigger element for the initiation of protein synthesis. While the mechanisms by which Leu is ‘sensed’ have been the subject of great scrutiny, as a branched‐chain amino acid, Leu can be catabolized within muscle, thus posing the possibility that metabolites of Leu could be involved in mediating the anabolic effect(s) of Leu. Our objective was to measure muscle protein anabolism in response to Leu and its metabolite HMB. Using [1,2‐13C2]Leu and [2H5]phenylalanine tracers, and GC‐MS/GC‐C‐IRMS we studied the effect of HMB or Leu alone on MPS (by tracer incorporation into myofibrils), and for HMB we also measured muscle proteolysis (by arteriovenous (A–V) dilution). Orally consumed 3.42 g free‐acid (FA‐HMB) HMB (providing 2.42 g of pure HMB) exhibited rapid bioavailability in plasma and muscle and, similarly to 3.42 g Leu, stimulated muscle protein synthesis (MPS; HMB +70%vs. Leu +110%). While HMB and Leu both increased anabolic signalling (mechanistic target of rapamycin; mTOR), this was more pronounced with Leu (i.e. p70S6K1 signalling ≤90 min vs. ≤30 min for HMB). HMB consumption also attenuated muscle protein breakdown (MPB; −57%) in an insulin‐independent manner. We conclude that exogenous HMB induces acute muscle anabolism (increased MPS and reduced MPB) albeit perhaps via distinct, and/or additional mechanism(s) to Leu.

5 June 2016 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJoseph Bass
Joseph Bass
DWD. J. Wilkinson
D. J. Wilkinson
DRD. Rankin
D. Rankin
Beth PhillipsBeth Phillips
Beth Phillips
Nathaniel SzewczykNathaniel Szewczyk
Nathaniel Szewczyk
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
The applications of Western/immunoblotting (WB) techniques have reached multiple layers of the scientific community and are now considered routine procedures in the field of physiology. This is none more so than in relation to skeletal muscle physiology (i.e., resolving the mechanisms underpinning adaptations to exercise). Indeed, the inclusion of WB data is now considered an essential aspect of many such physiological publications to provide mechanistic insight into regulatory processes. Despite this popularity, and due to the ubiquitous and relatively inexpensive availability of WB equipment, the quality of WB in publications and subsequent analysis and interpretation of the data can be variable, perhaps resulting in spurious conclusions. This may be due to poor laboratory technique and/or lack of comprehension of the critical steps involved in WB and what quality control procedures should be in place to ensure robust data generation. The present review aims to provide a detailed description and critique of WB procedures and technicalities, from sample collection through preparation, blotting and detection, to analysis of the data collected. We aim to provide the reader with improved expertise to critically conduct, evaluate, and troubleshoot the WB process, to produce reproducible and reliable blots.

7 November 2016 in The Journal of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMatthew Brook
Matthew Brook
DWDaniel J. Wilkinson
Daniel J. Wilkinson
WMWilliam K. Mitchell
William K. Mitchell
JLJonathan Lund
Jonathan Lund
Beth PhillipsBeth Phillips
Beth Phillips
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
Key points: Resistance exercise training (RET) is one of the most effective strategies for preventing declines in skeletal muscle mass and strength with age. Hypertrophic responses to RET with age are diminished compared to younger individuals. In response to 6 weeks RET, we found blunted hypertrophic responses with age are underpinned by chronic deficits in long‐term muscle protein synthesis. We show this is likely to be the result of multifactorial deficits in anabolic hormones and blunted translational efficiency and capacity. These results provide great insight into age‐related exercise adaptations and provide a platform on which to devise appropriate nutritional and exercise interventions on a longer term basis. Ageing is associated with impaired hypertrophic responses to resistance exercise training (RET). Here we investigated the aetiology of ‘anabolic resistance’ in older humans. Twenty healthy male individuals, 10 younger (Y; 23 ± 1 years) and 10 older (O; 69 ± 3 years), performed 6 weeks unilateral RET (6 × 8 repetitions, 75% of one repetition maximum (1‐RM), 3 times per week). After baseline bilateral vastus lateralis (VL) muscle biopsies, subjects consumed 150 ml D2O (70 atom%; thereafter 50 ml week−1), further bilateral VL muscle biopsies were taken at 3 and 6 weeks to quantify muscle protein synthesis (MPS) via gas chromatography–pyrolysis–isotope ratio mass spectrometry. After RET, 1‐RM increased in Y (+35 ± 4%) and O (+25 ± 3%; P < 0.01), while MVC increased in Y (+21 ± 5%; P < 0.01) but not O (+6 ± 3%; not significant (NS)). In comparison to Y, O displayed blunted RET‐induced increases in muscle thickness (at 3 and 6 weeks, respectively, Y: +8 ± 1% and +11 ± 2%, P < 0.01; O: +2.6 ± 1% and +3.5 ± 2%, NS). While ‘basal’ longer term MPS was identical between Y and O (∼1.35 ± 0.1% day−1), MPS increased in response to RET only in Y (3 weeks, Y: 1.61 ± 0.1% day−1; O: 1.49 ± 0.1% day−1). Consistent with this, O exhibited inferior ribosomal biogenesis (RNA:DNA ratio and c‐MYC induction: Y: +4 ± 2 fold change; O: +1.9 ± 1 fold change), translational efficiency (S6K1 phosphorylation, Y: +10 ± 4 fold change; O: +4 ± 2 fold change) and anabolic hormone milieu (testosterone, Y: 367 ± 19; O: 274 ± 19 ng dl−1 (all P < 0.05). Anabolic resistance is thus multifactorial.

1 March 2014 in American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDaniel J. Wilkinson
Daniel J. Wilkinson
Martino FranchiMartino Franchi
Martino Franchi
MBMatthew Brook
Matthew Brook
MNMarco V. Narici
Marco V. Narici
JWJohn P. Williams
John P. Williams
Ken SmithKen Smith
Ken Smith
Quantification of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) remains a cornerstone for understanding the control of muscle mass. Traditional [13C]amino acid tracer methodologies necessitate sustained bed rest and intravenous cannulation(s), restricting studies to ∼12 h, and thus cannot holistically inform on diurnal MPS. This limits insight into the regulation of habitual muscle metabolism in health, aging, and disease while querying the utility of tracer techniques to predict the long-term efficacy of anabolic/anticatabolic interventions. We tested the efficacy of the D2O tracer for quantifying MPS over a period not feasible with13C tracers and too short to quantify changes in mass. Eight men (22 ± 3.5 yr) undertook one-legged resistance exercise over an 8-day period (4 × 8–10 repetitions, 80% 1RM every 2nd day, to yield “nonexercised” vs. “exercise” leg comparisons), with vastus lateralis biopsies taken bilaterally at 0, 2, 4, and 8 days. After day 0 biopsies, participants consumed a D2O bolus (150 ml, 70 atom%); saliva was collected daily. Fractional synthetic rates (FSRs) of myofibrillar (MyoPS), sarcoplasmic (SPS), and collagen (CPS) protein fractions were measured by GC-pyrolysis-IRMS and TC/EA-IRMS. Body water initially enriched at 0.16–0.24 APE decayed at ∼0.009%/day. In the nonexercised leg, MyoPS was 1.45 ± 0.10, 1.47 ± 0.06, and 1.35 ± 0.07%/day at 0–2, 0–4, and 0–8 days, respectively (∼0.05–0.06%/h). MyoPS was greater in the exercised leg (0–2 days: 1.97 ± 0.13%/day; 0–4 days: 1.96 ± 0.15%/day, P < 0.01; 0–8 days: 1.79 ± 0.12%/day, P < 0.05). CPS was slower than MyoPS but followed a similar pattern, with the exercised leg tending to yield greater FSRs (0–2 days: 1.14 ± 0.13 vs. 1.45 ± 0.15%/day; 0–4 days: 1.13 ± 0.07%/day vs. 1.47 ± 0.18%/day; 0–8 days: 1.03 ± 0.09%/day vs. 1.40 ± 0.11%/day). SPS remained unchanged. Therefore, D2O has unrivaled utility to quantify day-to-day MPS in humans and inform on short-term changes in anabolism and presumably catabolism alike.

13 July 2015 in The FASEB Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMatthew Brook
Matthew Brook
DWDaniel J. Wilkinson
Daniel J. Wilkinson
WMWilliam K. Mitchell
William K. Mitchell
JLJonathan Lund
Jonathan Lund
Nathaniel SzewczykNathaniel Szewczyk
Nathaniel Szewczyk
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton