Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing dentistry, offering new opportunities to improve the precision and efficiency of implantology. This literature review aims to evaluate the current evidence on the use of AI in implant planning assessment. The analysis was conducted through PubMed and Scopus search engines, using a combination of relevant keywords, including “artificial intelligence implantology”, “AI implant planning”, “AI dental implant”, and “implantology artificial intelligence”. Selected articles were carefully reviewed to identify studies reporting data on the effectiveness of AI in implant planning. The results of the literature review indicate a growing interest in the application of AI in implant planning, with evidence suggesting an improvement in precision and predictability compared to traditional methods. The summary of the obtained findings by the included studies represents the latest AI developments in implant planning, demonstrating its application for the automated detection of bones, the maxillary sinus, neuronal structure, and teeth. However, some disadvantages were also identified, including the need for high-quality training data and the lack of standardization in protocols. In conclusion, the use of AI in implant planning presents promising prospects for improving clinical outcomes and optimizing patient management. However, further research is needed to fully understand its potential and address the challenges associated with its implementation in clinical practice.

Objectives: The objective of this narrative review was to evaluate the clinical challenges encountered in the application of the 2018 AAP/EFP Classification of Periodontitis. Methods: Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify studies reporting diagnostic accuracy and inter- and intra-examiner agreement when using the 2018 Classification, both with and without the aid of implementation tools. Results: Eleven studies were included, encompassing a total of 459 clinical cases. Overall, 852 examiners participated, with 31 gold-standard examiners providing the reference diagnoses. General dentists often exhibited lower diagnostic accuracy and consistency compared to students and periodontal experts. Diagnostic challenges were observed in staging, particularly distinguishing between Stage III/IV and gingivitis/Stage I. Grading reliability was reduced in the absence of longitudinal data and high-level modifying factors. This review also explored difficulties in reporting ‘hopeless teeth’ and assigning the extent of periodontitis. Education, training, and implementation tools substantially improved diagnostic accuracy and consistency, increasing the agreement with reference diagnosis and strengthening inter- and intra-examiner agreement. Conclusions: The application of the 2018 Classification showed notable variability in diagnostic accuracy and inter- and intra-examiner agreement. Improving clinician experience and training and incorporating diagnostic aids and emerging AI technologies has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency, which are essential for precisely estimating periodontitis prevalence, interpreting research findings, and determining prognosis and treatment needs.

Introduction: The physiological process of wound healing is a complex and dynamic series of events that aims to restore damaged tissues to their original structure and function. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous blood-derived product, is characterized by a high concentration of platelets suspended in a small volume of plasma, along with a complete array of coagulation factors at physiological concentrations. Beyond platelets, PRP contains a significant quantity of bioactive growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), all of which are crucial mediators of tissue repair and osteogenesis. Due to these properties, PRP has garnered considerable attention in oral surgery, where the efficient regeneration of both hard and soft tissues is critical for the optimal therapeutic outcomes. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the efficacy of PRP in oral surgical procedures, with particular emphasis on its role in the regeneration of both soft and hard tissues, as well as its clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the review sought to identify the diverse surgical applications of PRP and assess the impact of its use in conjunction with grafting materials on regenerative outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted, analyzing articles published within the last decade regarding the application of PRP in oral surgery, specifically focusing on periodontal, regenerative, and implant-related procedures. Studies were selected based on rigorous inclusion criteria, assessing the utilization of PRP across different clinical settings. Results: Thirteen relevant studies were included, which were categorized as follows: three studies involving implant surgery, three studies focusing on third molar extractions, two studies on regenerative surgery, two studies addressing periodontal surgery, one study examining intrabony periodontal defects, and two studies on ridge augmentation procedures. The majority of studies reported modest improvements in clinical parameters such as periodontal probing depth and clinical attachment level (CAL). Furthermore, significant positive outcomes were observed in soft tissue healing, with notable enhancements in bone density. These results suggest that PRP may facilitate the healing process, particularly in soft tissues, while also promoting bone regeneration to a degree. Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review underscore the potential of PRP as a valuable adjunct in oral surgery, demonstrating significant benefits in the regeneration of soft tissues and, to a lesser extent, hard tissues. Notably, the standalone application of PRP did not yield substantial improvements in regenerative outcomes. However, when PRP was used in combination with grafting materials, more pronounced benefits were observed, indicating a synergistic effect that enhances both soft and hard tissue regeneration. These findings support the rationale for incorporating PRP into clinical practice, particularly in conjunction with grafting materials, to optimize patient outcomes in oral surgery. Further research, particularly involving larger sample sizes and long-term follow-ups, is necessary to fully elucidate the optimal clinical applications and mechanistic pathways of PRP in oral regenerative procedures.

Background: Modern dentistry strives to achieve increasingly less invasive procedures as the ultimate therapeutic goal. The careful selection of suitable candidates for immediate dental implants can offer an opportunity to reduce treatment time, lower the relative costs and improve overall patient satisfaction. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in March 2025, without any time restrictions, in Medline, Pubmed and Web of Science databases. To identify other related references, further research was performed. Articles related to current knowledge about the immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial prosthesis in the posterior region were included. Articles not available in abstract form and articles not published in the English language were excluded. Results: A total of ten studies were eligible for inclusion in the current study. The search strategy resulted in a survival rate ranging from 86% to 100%, and a failure rate of less than 21.6%, with a mean follow-up of 55.6 months. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in survival rates between implants placed in the maxilla and mandible (χ² = 0.42, p = 0.81, df = 2). Follow-up varied from one to ten years, reflecting variability both in study design and duration. Conclusions: The selected studies highlight the heterogeneity in immediate loading protocols for implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis in the posterior regions, emphasizing the variability in prosthetic materials and implant types, suggesting that immediate loading is a reliable, patient-centered therapeutic option with favorable long-term outcomes.

Background. Implant-supported cantilever prostheses enable a more straightforward rehabilitation and may be a therapeutic option to reduce treatment morbidity, costs, and time. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of fixed implant-supported partial dentures made of monolithic zirconia with a cantilever design to replace missing posterior teeth. Methods. Fifteen partially edentulous patients received 34 implants and were provided with 16 zirconia fixed partial prostheses (FPPs) with one cantilever extension replacing mandibular or maxillary missing posterior and lateral teeth. Patients were re-examined for up to 4 years. Patient ages ranged from 41 to 65 years, with a mean age of 53±12 years; 47% were female, and 53% were male. The patients were observed for a mean period of 42±6 months with a minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 4 years. Results. Peri-implantitis was observed in two cases. No chipping or fracture of any FPP was detected. Loosening of the abutment screw was a technical complication in one case. The rehabilitation survival rate was 100%. Implant-supported zirconia FPP with one mesial cantilever extension provides an aesthetic, functional treatment alternative to replace missing molars, premolars, and canines. These excellent clinical outcomes occurred over a mean observation time of 42±6 months. Conclusion. Using monolithic zirconia milled with CAD-CAM technology might be an alternative to the metal-ceramic restoration in implant-supported FPP with one cantilever.