Rachel Cooper

Prof. Rachel Cooper


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2001 in Construction Management and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michail KagioglouMichail Kagioglou
Michail Kagioglou
RCRachel Cooper
Rachel Cooper
GAGhassan Aouad
Ghassan Aouad
This paper presents a review of the literature on performance management and measurement in various industries with the aim of transferring best practice into construction. A framework is presented which ensures that effective strategies are deployed to form the performance management system that construction organizations can adopt. The performance measurement process (conceptual) framework (PMPF) adopts the balanced scorecard (BSC) with the addition of a number of elements and perspectives. It rationalizes the relationships between performance measures and goals derived from strategy, so the impact of those measures on an organization's performance can be examined and analysed to indicate potential areas for improvement

1 July 2011 in Progress in Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristopher Boyko
Christopher Boyko
RCRachel Cooper
Rachel Cooper

24 February 2005 in Journal of Product Innovation Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HPHelen Perks
Helen Perks
RCRachel Cooper
Rachel Cooper
CJCassie Jones
Cassie Jones

20 April 2012 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dexter HuntDexter Hunt
Dexter Hunt
DLD. Rachel Lombardi
D. Rachel Lombardi
SAStuart Atkinson
Stuart Atkinson
ABAustin R. G. Barber
Austin R. G. Barber
MBMatthew Barnes
Matthew Barnes
Christopher RogersChristopher Rogers
Christopher Rogers
Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period.

1 February 2012 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristopher Boyko
Christopher Boyko
MGMark Gaterell
Mark Gaterell
ABAustin R.G. Barber
Austin R.G. Barber
JBJulie Brown
Julie Brown
JBJohn R. Bryson
John R. Bryson
Christopher RogersChristopher Rogers
Christopher Rogers

27 February 2009 in Facilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRicardo Codinhoto
Ricardo Codinhoto
PTPatricia Tzortzopoulos
Patricia Tzortzopoulos
Michail KagioglouMichail Kagioglou
Michail Kagioglou
GAGhassan Aouad
Ghassan Aouad
RCRachel Cooper
Rachel Cooper
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework that categorises the features and characteristics of the built environment that impact on health outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – An extensive literature review was carried out. A total of 1,163 abstracts were assessed, leading to 92 papers being reviewed. Findings – There is a considerable amount of evidence linking healthcare environments to patients' health outcomes, despite the lack of clarity in relation to cause-effect relationships. Originality/value – The paper proposes a theoretical framework linking different built environment characteristics to health outcomes. This framework provides a structure to group causal effects according to their relation with design features, materials and ambient properties, art and aesthetic aspects and use of the built environment.