The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (adj-CT) in stage II colon cancer remains controversial. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic value of ctDNA in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on postoperative detection, post adj-CT outcomes, and dynamic surveillance. A literature search identified studies correlating ctDNA positivity in stage II CRC with recurrence risk, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Postoperative ctDNA positivity significantly increased the risk of recurrence (pooled risk ratio [RR:] 3.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25–10.72; p = 0.002). CtDNA positivity after adj-CT was strongly associated with poor survival, while dynamic ctDNA monitoring detected recurrence earlier than conventional methods, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and imaging. CtDNA is a robust prognostic biomarker in stage II CRC, enabling personalized treatment. High-risk ctDNA-positive patients may benefit from intensified therapy, while ctDNA-negative patients could avoid unnecessary treatments. However, the standardization of detection methods and large-scale validation studies are needed before integrating ctDNA into routine clinical practice as a non-invasive, dynamic tool for personalized care.

Background: Studies evaluating sex differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumor microenvironment are limited, and no previous study has focused on rectal cancer patients’ constitutive immune surveillance mechanisms. The authors aimed to assess gender-related differences in the immune microenvironment of rectal cancer patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted up to 31 May 2021, including studies focusing on gender-related differences in the CRC tumor microenvironment. Data on the mutational profile of rectal cancer were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A subanalysis of the two IMMUNOREACT trials (NCT04915326 and NCT04917263) was performed, aiming to detect gender-related differences in the immune microenvironment of the healthy mucosa in patients with early (IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort) and locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy (IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort). In the retrospective IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort (therapy naive), the authors enrolled 442 patients (177 female and 265 male), while in the retrospective IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort (patients who had neoadjuvant therapy), we enrolled 264 patients (80 female and 184 male). In the prospective IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort (therapy naive), the authors enrolled 72 patients (26 female and 46 male), while in the prospective IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort (patients who had neoadjuvant therapy), the authors enrolled 105 patients (42 female and 63 male). Results: Seven studies reported PD-L1 expression in the CRC microenvironment, but no significant difference could be identified between the sexes. In the TGCA series, mutations of SYNE1 and RYR2 were significantly more frequent in male patients with rectal cancer. In the IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort, male patients had a higher expression of epithelial cells expressing HLA class I, while female patients had a higher number of activated CD4+Th1 cells. Female patients in the IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort showed a higher infiltration of epithelial cells expressing CD86 and activated cytotoxic T cells (P=0.01). Conclusions: Male patients have more frequent oncogene mutations associated with a lower expression of T-cell activation genes. In the healthy mucosa of female patients, more Th1 cells and cytotoxic T cells suggest a potentially better immune response to the tumor. Sex should be considered when defining the treatment strategy for rectal cancer patients or designing prognostic scores.

Background: Adult pancreatoblastoma (PBL) is a rare pancreatic malignancy, with recent evidence suggesting a possible link to familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study aims to review the latest evidence and explore a possible association between adult PBL and FAP. Methods: Two independent literature reviews were conducted: (1) on PBL and FAP, and (2) on PBL in the adult population not diagnosed with FAP. Results: Out of 26 articles on PBL and FAP screened, 5 were selected for systematic review, including 1 additional case. We identified eight FAP-related PBL cases, with a median age of 40 (IQR: 34–50). Of these, seven (87%) occurred in adults. We found 65 cases of adult PBL not FAP-related; thus, 7 out of 65 cases (10.7%) of adult PBL reported in the literature are associated with a clinical diagnosis of FAP or were carriers of APC germline pathogenic variants (GPVs). Conclusion: Data suggest a non-random association between adult PBL and FAP. Further research is essential to optimise surveillance protocols and develop more effective treatment strategies.

Pouchitis is an idiopathic inflammatory disease that may occur in ileal pouches, and it can lead to ileal pouch failure. This was a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that assessed the effect of Lactobacillus casei (L. casei) DG®, a probiotic strain, on the ileal pouch mucosa to determine the crosstalk between microbiota and mucosal immune system. Fifty-two patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy were recruited and randomly assigned to receive a daily oral supplementation of L. casei DG® (n = 26) or placebo (n = 26) for 8 weeks from the ileostomy closure (T0) to a pouch endoscopy after 8 weeks (T1) and 1 year (T2). Ileal pouch mucosa samples were collected at T0, T1, and T2. At T1, the L. casei DG®-supplemented group showed a significant reduction of inflammatory cytokines levels compared to T0 baseline levels in the pouch mucosa, whereas in the placebo group cytokines levels resulted stable. In conclusion, probiotic manipulation of mucosal microbiota by L. casei DG®-supplementation after stoma closure in patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy has a beneficial impact on the ileal pouch microenvironment. Registration number: NCT03136419 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Background: Anastomotic leaks (ALs) remain a critical complication after rectal cancer surgery. Emerging evidence suggests that local immune dysregulation may play a key role in anastomotic healing. We investigated the immune microenvironment of histologically normal, tumor-adjacent rectal mucosa—a tumor-conditioned field—as a potential substrate for AL predisposition. Methods: IMMUNOREACT 4 is a sub-analysis of the IMMUNOREACT project (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04915326 and NCT04915326), a multicenter translational study evaluating immune features of histologically normal, tumor-adjacent rectal mucosa of patients undergoing colorectal anastomosis. A prospective cohort (n = 121) was analyzed using flow cytometry, in addition to a retrospective cohort (n = 262) using immunohistochemistry. Immune markers of epithelial activation and lymphocyte subsets were compared between patients with and without postoperative ALs. Exploratory predictive models combining immune and clinical variables were developed and evaluated using discrimination, calibration and decision curve analyses. Results: At flow cytometry, the CK⁺HLAabc⁺ MFI (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.52–0.80), CD8⁺CD38⁺ cell rate (AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.52–0.78) and CD3⁺CTLA4⁺ cell rate (AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.51–0.80) showed moderate predictive potential for ALs. In immunohistochemistry, CD3⁺ (AUC 0.57, 95% CI 0.54–0.60), CD8⁺ (AUC 0.57, 95% CI 0.52–0.62), CD8β⁺ (AUC 0.59, 95% CI 0.53–0.65) and Tbet⁺ (AUC 0.60, 95% CI 0.56–0.64) showed some predictive ability for ALs. The model including CD8β⁺, the BMI, neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio and tumor location had an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI 0.62–0.72). Conclusions: Immune activation within histologically normal, tumor-adjacent rectal mucosa—characterized by epithelial HLA upregulation and cytotoxic or Th1 T cell infiltration—is associated with postoperative ALs. Although predictive accuracy is limited, these findings support the concept that a tumor-conditioned immune microenvironment may predispose patients to impaired anastomotic healing. Integration of mucosal immune profiling with clinical variables represents a promising exploratory approach that warrants further prospective validation.

Background: Rectal cancer management involves surgery, chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and patient care strategies, all of which significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Understanding these effects is critical for optimizing treatment protocols. This review aimed to systematically analyze the impact of rectal cancer treatment on HRQoL. Methods: Four databases, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2013 and December 2023. RCTs specifically focusing on rectal cancer treatments (surgical interventions, pre- and/or post-CT and/or RT, and patient care strategies) were included. An abstract review, data extraction, and a risk-of-bias assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers. Results: The 41 included studies comprised 9240 patients: 16 evaluated surgical interventions (3507 patients), 15 evaluated pre- and/or post-CT and/or RT protocols (5114 patients), and 10 focused on patient-care strategies (619 patients). Sphincter-sparing procedures were associated with better HRQoL than abdominoperineal resection, and rectal-sparing techniques were associated with better overall HRQoL than rectal resection. RT was associated with a poorer HRQoL. Continuity-of-care interventions improved HRQoL in ostomy patients, whereas transanal irrigation improved HRQoL after ostomy closure. Conclusions: This systematic review of RCTs underscores the importance of organ-sparing strategies, such as rectum-sparing approaches and continuity-of-care packages, in improving HRQoL in patients with rectal cancer. Although RT negatively affects HRQoL, treatment regimens should be individualized. Tailored organ-preservation approaches and structured follow-up care are essential for optimizing HRQoL in patients with rectal cancer.