xuemei hu

Dr. xuemei hu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 September 2020 in Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYang Yang
Yang Yang
LDLin Ding
Lin Ding
XZXianlun Zou
Xianlun Zou
YSYaqi Shen
Yaqi Shen
DHDaoyu Hu
Daoyu Hu
IKIhab R. Kamel
Ihab R. Kamel

1 June 2019 in European Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJingyu Lu
Jingyu Lu
DHDaoyu Hu
Daoyu Hu
HTHao Tang
Hao Tang
XHxuemei hu
xuemei hu
YSYaqi Shen
Yaqi Shen
IKIhab R. Kamel
Ihab R. Kamel

20 January 2022 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YYYang Yang
Yang Yang
XZXianlun Zou
Xianlun Zou
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
GYGuanjie Yuan
Guanjie Yuan
DHDaoyu Hu
Daoyu Hu
ZLZhen Li
Zhen Li


4 March 2022 in Insights into Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYang Yang
Yang Yang
XZXianlun Zou
Xianlun Zou
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
GYGuanjie Yuan
Guanjie Yuan
DHDaoyu Hu
Daoyu Hu
ZLZhen Li
Zhen Li
Objectives: To develop a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) based radiomic signature for predicting early recurrence (ER) (i.e., recurrence within 1 year after surgery), and to explore the potential value for individualized adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 124 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) were randomly divided into the training (n = 87) and the validation set (n = 37). Radiomic signature was built using radiomic features extracted from DWI with random forest. An integrated radiomic nomogram was constructed with multivariate logistic regression analysis to demonstrate the incremental value of the radiomic signature beyond clinicopathological-radiographic factors. A clinicopathological-radiographic (CPR) model was constructed as a reference. Results: The radiomic signature showed a comparable discrimination performance for predicting ER to CPR model in the validation set (AUC, 0.753 vs. 0.621, p = 0.274). Integrating the radiomic signature with clinicopathological-radiographic factors further improved prediction performance compared with CPR model, with an AUC of 0.821 (95%CI 0.684–0.959) in the validation set (p = 0.01). The radiomic signature succeeded to stratify patients into distinct survival outcomes according to their risk index of ER, and remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariable analysis (disease-free survival (DFS), p < 0.0001; overall survival (OS), p = 0.029). Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy improved prognosis in high-risk patients defined by the radiomic signature (DFS, p = 0.029; OS, p = 0.088) and defined by the nomogram (DFS, p = 0.031; OS, p = 0.023), whereas poor chemotherapy efficacy was detected in low-risk patients. Conclusions: The preoperative DWI-based radiomic signature could improve prognostic prediction and help to identify ICC patients who may benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.