Eilidh Martin

Dr. Eilidh Martin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in Cytokine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EMEilidh Martin
Eilidh Martin
KOKatherine M. Oliver
Katherine M. Oliver
EPE. Ian Pearce
E. Ian Pearce
ATAlan Tomlinson
Alan Tomlinson
PSPeter Simmons
Peter Simmons
SHSuzanne Hagan
Suzanne Hagan
Three tear supplements were compared for their effects on the signs, symptoms and inflammatory status of subjects with dry eye disease. Assessments were made before and after both 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. In this masked, randomized, 3-way crossover trial, eighteen dry eye subjects were recruited. At each visit, symptoms, tear evaporation rate, stability and osmolarity were measured and tear samples were analyzed for 7 inflammatory markers, using multiplex immunoassays. The 3 treatments included carboxymethylcellulose-glycerine-castor oil (CGC), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and hydroxypropyl guar (HPG). The CGC and HPG drops are emulsified lipids; CGC also contains osmoprotectants. The CMC drop is a standard aqueous polymeric supplement. Significant improvements were seen in symptoms (OSDI) and tear stability (NITBUT) with all 3 treatments at 4 weeks. At 4 weeks post-CGC, 6 out of 7 biomarkers demonstrated a >25% reduction (in 40% of subjects). The same reduction (>25%) was seen in 10% of the subjects for CMC and in none of the subjects for HPG. No significantly different change to either evaporation rate or tear osmolarity was found following any of the three treatments. In this study, the CGC treatment resulted in the greatest reduction in ocular biomarkers of inflammation, while all 3 treatments reduced symptoms and improved tear stability. These results indicate that subject-perceived symptomatic improvements are not necessarily associated with a reduction in objective measures of inflammation.

8 November 2023 in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNikhil Sharma
Nikhil Sharma
EMEilidh Martin
Eilidh Martin
EPEdward Ian Pearce
Edward Ian Pearce
SHSuzanne Hagan
Suzanne Hagan
Demodex blepharitis does not have agreed standardized guidelines. The aim of this study was to classify signs and symptoms and to develop appropriate management strategies for Demodex blepharitis from a consensus of expert advice. A total of 11 anterior segment experts (ophthalmologists, optometrists and a contact lens optician) working in the United Kingdom participated in a modified 2-round Delphi panel. A mixed-methods approach was adopted and a survey questionnaire for round 1 was formulated, constructed from information in the available literature. Based on panel responses from round 1, feedback was provided and a round 2 questionnaire was formulated. More than two-thirds majority (72%) was used for consensus building. Based on the clinical presentation of signs and symptoms along with associated conditions and risk factors, a diagnostic algorithm was proposed for the clinical investigation of Demodex blepharitis. A treatment algorithm was also proposed with first-line and second-line treatment recommendations for Demodex blepharitis. The recommendation from this study provides the first effort in formulating clinical diagnostic algorithm and management guidelines for Demodex blepharitis. The guidelines include appropriate magnification on the slit lamp, associated signs, symptoms, risk factors and suggested management options. These guidelines can be used in a routine eyecare setting to encourage eyecare practitioners in tailoring the investigation and management of Demodex blepharitis.

21 June 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMungunshur Byambajav
Mungunshur Byambajav
CACristina Arroyo del Arroyo
Cristina Arroyo del Arroyo
Amalia Enríquez-de-SalamancaAmalia Enríquez-de-Salamanca
Amalia Enríquez-de-Salamanca
IMItziar Fernández Martínez
Itziar Fernández Martínez
EMEilidh Martin
Eilidh Martin
SHSuzanne Hagan
Suzanne Hagan
The concentrations of insulin, leptin, active ghrelin, C-peptide and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and their inter-day variations were examined in normal human tears. In addition, correlations between the concentrations of these metabolic proteins and ocular surface parameters were determined. Subjects with healthy ocular surfaces attended three visits, with 7-day intervals. Tear evaporation rate (TER) and non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) were assessed, and a total of 2 µL tears were collected from all subjects. Tear fluid concentrations of insulin, leptin, active ghrelin, C-peptide and GIP were measured by multiplex bead analysis. Insulin was the most highly expressed metabolic protein, followed by leptin, C-peptide, active ghrelin and GIP. Of these, only active ghrelin had a significant inter-day variation (p < 0.05). There was no inter-day variation in the mean concentrations of the other metabolic proteins. Leptin had a strong intra-class reproducibility. No correlation was detected between tear metabolic protein concentrations and ocular surface parameters. This pilot study shows, for the first time, that active ghrelin and GIP are detectable in healthy tears. The strong intra-class reproducibility for leptin shows that it could be used as a potential tear fluid biomarker and, possibly, in determining the effects of metabolic disorders on the ocular surface.

17 March 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNeema Ghorbani Mojarrad
Neema Ghorbani Mojarrad
James S. WolffsohnJames S. Wolffsohn
James S. Wolffsohn
Jennifer P CraigJennifer P Craig
Jennifer P Craig
DDDebarun Dutta
Debarun Dutta
BHByki Huntjens
Byki Huntjens
MVMarta Vianya-Estopa
Marta Vianya-Estopa
Backgrounds/Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare differences in the physical characteristics of lissamine green (LG) strips and the outcomes of using different staining techniques. Methods: Two separate complementary investigations were conducted. Physical study: Differences between four LG strips were evaluated in terms of material, dye concentration, and dye absorption. In vivo study: Bulbar conjunctival staining was compared for four application methods of I-DEW LG strips presented in a randomized order for twenty-two participants: (1) single application 5 s after wetting (also repeated using GreenGlo for comparison), (2) single application using two strips held together, 5 s after wetting, (3) two applications using a single LG strip 5 s after wetting, 1 minute apart, (4) the same as method 3, with a single fluorescein strip in between LG applications. White light imaging was performed immediately following application and after 30, 60, 90, and 300 s. Three masked practitioners independently evaluated the randomized staining images for spot count and staining intensity. Results: Physical study: Strip paper fibres demonstrated visible similarities, with no difference in saline absorption (p > 0.05). LG concentration increased as saline retention duration increased (F = 964.1, p < 0.001), and GreenGlo tips were significantly darker (F = 2775.2, p < 0.001). In vivo study: I-DEW application resulted in less conjunctival staining than GreenGlo (p < 0.001). Amongst I-DEW application techniques, staining levels were similar (p > 0.05); however, staining intensity was significantly higher following two applications of I-DEW, 1 min apart, compared to a single application (p = 0.042). Both spot count and staining intensity decreased with time (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Two applications of I-DEW using a single strip, 1 min apart, after wetting with a single drop of saline provided maximal staining. There was also a significant difference in staining intensity observed between LG products.