Michal Stupak

Michal Stupak

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Analytica Chimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMichal Stupak
Michal Stupak
IGIan Goodall
Ian Goodall
MTMonika Tomaniova
Monika Tomaniova
JPJana Pulkrabova
Jana Pulkrabova
JHJana Hajšlová
Jana Hajšlová
Whisky is one of the most popular spirit drinks in the world. Unfortunately, this highly valued commodity is vulnerable to fraud. To detect fraudulent practices and document quality parameters, a number of laboratory tests based on various principles including chromatography and spectroscopy have been developed. In most cases, the analytical methods are based on targeted screening strategies. Non-targeted screening (metabolomics fingerprinting) of (semi)volatile substances was used in our study. Following the pre-concentration of these compounds, either by solid phase microextraction (SPME) or by ethyl acetate extraction, gas chromatography (GC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (Q-TOF mass analyser) was employed. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and supervised partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were used for evaluation of data obtained by analysis of a unique set of 171 authentic whisky samples provided by the Scotch Whisky Research Institute. Very good separation of malt whiskies according to the type of cask in which they were matured (bourbon versus bourbon and wine) was achieved, and significant ´markers' for bourbon and wine cask maturation, such as N-(3-methylbutyl) acetamide and 5-oxooxolane-2-carboxylic acid, were identified. Subsequently, the unique sample set was used to construct a statistical model for distinguishing malt and blended whiskies. In the final phase, 20 fake samples were analysed and the data processed in the same way. Some differences could be observed in the (semi)volatile profiles of authentic and fake samples. Employing the statistical model developed by PLS-DA for this purpose, marker compounds that positively distinguish fake samples were identified.

1 August 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJana Pulkrabova
Jana Pulkrabova
MSMichal Stupak
Michal Stupak
ASAndrea Svarcova
Andrea Svarcova
Pavel RossnerPavel Rossner
Pavel Rossner
ARAndrea Rossnerova
Andrea Rossnerova
JHJana Hajšlová
Jana Hajšlová

10 May 2013 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKamila Kalachova
Kamila Kalachova
JPJana Pulkrabova
Jana Pulkrabova
TČTomáš Čajka
Tomáš Čajka
LDLucie Drábová
Lucie Drábová
MSMichal Stupak
Michal Stupak
JHJana Hajšlová
Jana Hajšlová

1 March 2020 in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAndrea Polachova
Andrea Polachova
TGTomas Gramblicka
Tomas Gramblicka
OPOndrej Parizek
Ondrej Parizek
RSRadim J. Sram
Radim J. Sram
MSMichal Stupak
Michal Stupak
JPJana Pulkrabova
Jana Pulkrabova

5 May 2020 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jitka ViktorováJitka Viktorová
Jitka Viktorová
MSMichal Stupak
Michal Stupak
KHKaterina Holasova
Katerina Holasova
SDSimona Dobiasová
Simona Dobiasová
LHLan Hoang
Lan Hoang
Tomas RumlTomas Ruml
Tomas Ruml
With strong antimicrobial properties, citral has been repeatedly reported to be the dominant component of lemongrass essential oil. Here, we report on a comparison of the antimicrobial and anticancer activity of citral and lemongrass essential oil. The lemongrass essential oil was prepared by the vacuum distillation of fresh Cymbopogon leaves, with a yield of 0.5% (w/w). Citral content was measured by gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) and determined to be 63%. Antimicrobial activity was tested by the broth dilution method, showing strong activity against all tested bacteria and fungi. Citral was up to 100 times more active than the lemongrass essential oil. Similarly, both citral and essential oils inhibited bacterial communication and adhesion during P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilm formation; however, the biofilm prevention activity of citral was significantly higher. Both the essential oil and citral disrupted the maturated P. aeruginosa biofilm with the IC50 7.3 ± 0.4 and 0.1 ± 0.01 mL/L, respectively. Although it may seem that the citral is the main biologically active compound of lemongrass essential oil and the accompanying components have instead antagonistic effects, we determined that the lemongrass essential oil-sensitized methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and doxorubicin-resistant ovarian carcinoma cells and that this activity was not caused by citral. A 1 mL/L dose of oil-sensitized MRSA to methicillin up to 9.6 times and a dose of 10 µL/L-sensitized ovarian carcinoma to doxorubicin up to 1.8 times. The mode of multidrug resistance modulation could be due to P-glycoprotein efflux pump inhibition. Therefore, the natural mixture of compounds present in the lemongrass essential oil provides beneficial effects and its direct use may be preferred to its use as a template for citral isolation.