Kate Umbers

Dr. Kate Umbers


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 January 2020 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJeffrey Harvey
Jeffrey Harvey
RHRobin Heinen
Robin Heinen
IAInge Armbrecht
Inge Armbrecht
YBYves Basset
Yves Basset
JBJames H. Baxter-Gilbert
James H. Baxter-Gilbert
HKHans de Kroon
Hans de Kroon

26 February 2021 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRachel A. Slatyer
Rachel A. Slatyer
KUKate Umbers
Kate Umbers
PAPieter A. Arnold
Pieter A. Arnold

12 April 2017 in Biology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KUKate Umbers
Kate Umbers
SBSebastiano De Bona
Sebastiano De Bona
TWThomas E. White
Thomas E. White
JLJussi Lehtonen
Jussi Lehtonen
JMJohanna Mappes
Johanna Mappes
JEJohn A. Endler
John A. Endler
Deimatic or ‘startle’ displays cause a receiver to recoil reflexively in response to a sudden change in sensory input. Deimatism is sometimes implicitly treated as a form of aposematism (unprofitability associated with a signal). However, the fundamental difference is, in order to provide protection, deimatism does not require a predator to have any learned or innate aversion. Instead, deimatism can confer a survival advantage by exploiting existing neural mechanisms in a way that releases a reflexive response in the predator. We discuss the differences among deimatism, aposematism, and forms of mimicry, and their ecological and evolutionary implications. We highlight outstanding questions critical to progress in understanding deimatism.

7 July 2022 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKBrianne Kent
Brianne Kent
CHConstance Holman
Constance Holman
EAEmmanuella Amoako
Emmanuella Amoako
AAAlberto Antonietti
Alberto Antonietti
JAJames M. Azam
James M. Azam
TWTracey L. Weissgerber
Tracey L. Weissgerber
Early career researchers (ECRs) are important stakeholders leading efforts to catalyze systemic change in research culture and practice. Here, we summarize the outputs from a virtual unconventional conference (unconference), which brought together 54 invited experts from 20 countries with extensive experience in ECR initiatives designed to improve the culture and practice of science. Together, we drafted 2 sets of recommendations for (1) ECRs directly involved in initiatives or activities to change research culture and practice; and (2) stakeholders who wish to support ECRs in these efforts. Importantly, these points apply to ECRs working to promote change on a systemic level, not only those improving aspects of their own work. In both sets of recommendations, we underline the importance of incentivizing and providing time and resources for systems-level science improvement activities, including ECRs in organizational decision-making processes, and working to dismantle structural barriers to participation for marginalized groups. We further highlight obstacles that ECRs face when working to promote reform, as well as proposed solutions and examples of current best practices. The abstract and recommendations for stakeholders are available in Dutch, German, Greek (abstract only), Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, and Serbian.

8 August 2022 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EDEleanor Drinkwater
Eleanor Drinkwater
WAWilliam L. Allen
William L. Allen
JEJohn A. Endler
John A. Endler
RHRoger T. Hanlon
Roger T. Hanlon
GHGrace Holmes
Grace Holmes
KUKate Umbers
Kate Umbers

1 January 2013 in Journal of Insect Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KUKate Umbers
Kate Umbers
MHM.E. Herberstein
M.E. Herberstein
JMJoshua S Madin
Joshua S Madin