The combined application of steel–FRP composite bars (SFCBs) and seawater sea-sand concrete (SSSC) in marine engineering not only solves the problem of resource scarcity and reduces the construction cost but also avoids the problems of chloride corrosion of steel reinforcement in seawater sea-sand concrete and the lack of ductility of FRP bars. At the same time, the addition of glass fiber (GF) and expansion agent (EA) in appropriate amounts improves the crack resistance and seepage resistance of concrete. However, the durability of SFCB with GF- and EA-reinforced SSSC in freezing–thawing environment remains unclear, which limits its potential application in cryogenic marine engineering. This study investigates the bonding properties between SFCB and GF-EA-SSSC interfaces using eccentric pullout experiments under different thicknesses of concrete protective cover and a number of freezing–thawing cycles. The results showed that the compressive strength and dynamic elastic modulus of SSSC decrease, while the mass loss increases with an increasing number of freezing–thawing cycles. Additionally, the bond strength and stiffness between SFCB and SSSC decrease, leading to an increase in relative slip. However, the rate of bond strength and stiffness loss decreases with an increase in the thickness of the concrete protective cover. Furthermore, formulas for bond strength, relative slip, and bond stiffness are established to quantify the effects of the thickness of the concrete protective cover and the number of freezing–thawing cycles. The experimental values obtained verify the accuracy of these formulas, with a relative error of less than 5%. Moreover, a bond stress–slip constitutive model is developed for SFCB and GF-EA-SSSC, and the fitting results closely resemble the experimental values, demonstrating a high level of model fit.

Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) containing recycled rubber gains increasing attention for reinforced concrete structures, owing to its benefits in resource-saving and environmental protection. Bonding between rebars and concrete is critical to ensure the composite action in reinforced concrete members. Nevertheless, previous studies on such concrete mainly focused on material aspects. Bonding behavior for rubber RAC is not clear and needs further research. This study aims to clarify the effects of recycled aggregate and rubber on the monotonic and fatigue bond behavior of deformed steel rebar in concrete and to propose predictive models. Pullout tests under monotonic, fatigue, and post-fatigue monotonic loadings are conducted on a total of 21 monotonic and 30 fatigue specimens, including normal concrete, RAC, and rubber RAC. Four types of failure modes are identified for the tested specimens. Effects of the replacement rate of recycled aggregate, rubber, and load level on the fatigue behavior, such as fatigue life, slip-loading cycle curves, slip development, and residual bond strength, are investigated. With the addition of recycled aggregate and rubber, the monotonic bond strength is increased by 60%. Based on the experimental results, theoretical formulas are proposed to predict the monotonic bond strength, fatigue life, and the slip under fatigue loading. The predictive models are verified by the experimental results, for example, the average and COV of the predicted-to-experimental bond strength ratio are 1.0 and 0.11, which proves the reasonability of the proposed models.

The application range of rubber-recycled aggregate concrete (RRAC), a new type of green building material, is currently limited due to performance defects, including low hardness, high water absorption, and poor adhesion. To expand its application in reinforced concrete structures, it is crucial to enhance the bonding performance between RRAC and steel bars. In this study, the effects of adding straight steel fibres (SSFs) and ring-type steel fibres (RSFs) to RRAC were investigated, in order to enhance the bonding performance. To investigate the impact of steel fibres (SFs) on the bonding properties of RRAC and steel bars, a total of 51 specimens were subjected to pull-out tests to systematically examine the impact of SSF and RSF dosages on the bonding performance. The results demonstrated that incorporating the optimal amount of SSFs and RSFs can significantly improve the bond strength and bond stiffness. Moreover, the combined use of SSFs and RSFs yielded even better enhancement effects. The RRAC exhibited remarkable performance, when the total content of SFs was 1.2% and the proportion of RSFs 75%. In this case, the bond strength and bond stiffness were enhanced by 3.7% and 53.88%, respectively. Finally, a bond–slip constitutive model for RRAC and steel bar was established. The combined use of SSFs and RSFs minimizes the limitations of poor mechanical properties in traditional RRAC and holds significant value for the widespread adoption and application of RRAC.