Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva

Dr. Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDSergio Diaz
Sergio Diaz
LPL.G. Pujades
L.G. Pujades
ABA.H. Barbat
A.H. Barbat
YVY.F. Vargas
Y.F. Vargas
DHDiego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva

7 August 2017 in Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YAYeudy Felipe Vargas Alzate
Yeudy Felipe Vargas Alzate
LBLluis G. Pujades Beneit
Lluis G. Pujades Beneit
ABAlex H. Barbat
Alex H. Barbat
JGJorge E. Hurtado Gomez
Jorge E. Hurtado Gomez
SDSergio Diaz
Sergio Diaz
DHDiego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
Most of buildings and structures are usually projected according to two main axes. However, the geographical position of these buildings varies randomly. Such random distributions of the azimuthal positions of structures, in most of the cities, generally, are not accounted for when assessing their seismic risk; certainly, the direction of the seismic loads is another highly random variable. Moreover, an additional important source of uncertainty is related to the structural response, mainly due to the random character of the mechanical properties. There is a consensus that uncertainties must be considered for adequately assessing the seismic risk of structures, but these directionality effects have not been deeply explored so far. In this article, the influence of the high uncertainty involved in these input variables on the expected seismic damage is analysed. Thus, an actual earthquake, which affected the southern part of Spain, is studied. Notably, damages on a group of affected buildings, located close to the epicentre, are analysed and discussed in detail. The results show that the influence of the random azimuthal position of structures is an important source of uncertainty and that it should be taken into account when estimating the expected seismic risk in urban areas.

9 October 2017 in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSergio Diaz
Sergio Diaz
LPLuis G. Pujades
Luis G. Pujades
ABAlex H. Barbat
Alex H. Barbat
DHDiego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
YVYeudy F. Vargas-Alzate
Yeudy F. Vargas-Alzate

2 December 2022 in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDiego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
LLLepolt Linkimer
Lepolt Linkimer
IAIvonne G. Arroyo
Ivonne G. Arroyo
Mario Arroyo-SolórzanoMario Arroyo-Solórzano
Mario Arroyo-Solórzano
RPRosey Piedra
Rosey Piedra
WRWilfredo Rojas
Wilfredo Rojas
Costa Rica is located at the boundary of four tectonic plates where the regularity of destructive earthquakes highlights the necessity of seismic hazard estimations. This study contains the most recent Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) for Costa Rica, calculated with the largest and the most updated earthquake database from both—the Earthquake Engineering Laboratory and the National Seismological Network of the University of Costa Rica. For the PSHA, we updated the seismicity parameters for the upper plate, subduction interplate, and intraslab tectonic domains, characterized the upper‐plate zones by percentages of fault types, and used weighted ground‐motion models for each of the tectonic domains. The resulted maps of peak ground acceleration (PGA) at return periods of 475 yr (PGA‐475) and 2475 yr, as well as the spectral accelerations, show geographic trends that allow for the division of the country in four seismic hazard levels: (1) extremely high for the Nicoya, Osa, and Burica peninsulas, situated directly above the subduction interplate, where the PGA‐475 could be 0.55–1.20g; (2) very high for most of the Guanacaste Province, where the PGA‐475 may be 0.55–0.70g; (3) high for most of the country (∼41%) with PGA‐475 values of 0.40–0.55g, including Central Costa Rica and the capital city of San Jose; and (4) moderate for the Talamanca Cordillera and Northern Costa Rica, with PGA‐475 up to 0.40g. These ground‐motion values are 0.1–0.6g higher than the previous PSHA for the Pacific peninsulas, Guanacaste, and the southeastern Caribbean. Further, hazard curves, uniform hazard spectra, and a hazard disaggregation indicate that the seismic hazard is lower but more complex in San Jose than in Liberia—the largest city in Guanacaste.

9 September 2020 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAarón Moya-Fernández
Aarón Moya-Fernández
LPLuis A. Pinzón
Luis A. Pinzón
VSVictor Schmidt-Díaz
Victor Schmidt-Díaz
DHDiego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
LPLuis G. Pujades
Luis G. Pujades
In this article, we present a strong‐motion database from earthquakes recorded by the Earthquake Engineering Laboratory at the University of Costa Rica. The database consists of 2471 three‐component accelerograms from 155 digitally recorded events. It covers the last 20 yr of measurements, including records from the 5 September 2012 Mw 7.6 Nicoya earthquake. The engineering and seismological communities can use this data either to conduct new research or to improve seismic hazard studies in the region. A catalog is also available with metadata of each record containing several intensity measures from the ground‐motion time histories.

1 August 2023 in Earthquake Spectra
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LNLaura Navas‐Sánchez
Laura Navas‐Sánchez
MJMaribel Jiménez‐Martínez
Maribel Jiménez‐Martínez
BGBeatriz González-Rodrigo
Beatriz González-Rodrigo
OHOrlando Hernández
Orlando Hernández
LDLuis Diego Dávila‐Migoya
Luis Diego Dávila‐Migoya
DHDiego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva
Diego Antonio Hidalgo-Leiva