The goal of this study was to compare insulin resistance in aging and aging-related neurodegenerative diseases, and to determine the relationship between insulin resistance and gray matter volume (GMV) in each cohort using an unbiased, voxel-based approach. Insulin resistance was estimated in apparently healthy elderly control (HC, n=21) and neurodegenerative disease (Alzheimer's disease (AD), n=20; Parkinson's disease (PD), n=22) groups using Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance 2 (HOMA2) and intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). HOMA2 and GMV were assessed within groups through General Linear Model multiple regression. We found that HOMA2 was increased in both AD and PD compared to the HC group (HC vs. AD, p=0.002, HC vs. PD, p=0.003), although only AD subjects exhibited increased fasting glucose (p=0.005). Furthermore, our voxel-based morphometry analysis revealed that HOMA2 was related to GMV in all cohorts in a region-specific manner (p<0.001, uncorrected). Significant relationships were observed in the medial prefrontal cortex (HC), medial temporal regions (AD), and parietal regions (PD). Finally, the directionality of the relationship between HOMA2 and GMV was disease-specific. Both HC and AD subjects exhibited negative relationships between HOMA2 and brain volume (increased HOMA2 associated with decreased brain volume), while a positive relationship was observed in PD. This cross-sectional study suggests that insulin resistance is increased in neurodegenerative disease, and that individuals with AD appear to have more severe metabolic dysfunction than individuals with PD or PD dementia.
1 February 2014 in Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
IPX066 is an extended release carbidopa/levodopa formulation designed to rapidly attain and maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations for a prolonged duration, allowing dosing intervals of approximately 6 h. The objective was to assess the efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life of IPX066 in the treatment of levodopa-naive Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week study of 381 levodopa-naïve patients assigned to placebo or IPX066 containing 145, 245 or 390 mg of levodopa administered three times daily (TID). The primary efficacy measure was change from Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) activities of daily living (Part II) + motor scores (Part III), at 30 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included UPDRS total and subscores, patient and clinician global impressions (PGI-I, CGI-I), and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). All IPX066 dosages were superior to placebo throughout the study and at 30 weeks (P < 0.0001). The mean improvement in UPDRS Parts II + III at 30 weeks compared to baseline was 11.7, 12.9, and 14.9 points for the three dosages and 0.6 points for placebo (P < 0.0001, all dosages). PDQ-39 total scores improved with IPX066 (P ≤ 0.034, all dosages). The most commonly reported adverse events with IPX066 included nausea, dizziness, and headache. No unexpected drug-related serious adverse events were reported. IPX066 provided significant clinical benefits at the three dosages tested compared to placebo and was well tolerated in levodopa-naive PD patients. Of the dosages tested, IPX066 145 mg TID appeared to provide the best overall balance between efficacy and safety.
2 April 2020 in Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
The response to levodopa (LR) is important for managing Parkinson’s Disease and is measured with clinical scales prior to (OFF) and after (ON) levodopa. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether an ambulatory wearable device could predict the LR from the response to the first morning dose. The ON and OFF scores were sorted into six categories of severity so that separating Parkinson’s Kinetigraph (PKG) features corresponding to the ON and OFF scores became a multi-class classification problem according to whether they fell below or above the threshold for each class. Candidate features were extracted from the PKG data and matched to the class labels. Several linear and non-linear candidate statistical models were examined and compared to classify the six categories of severity. The resulting model predicted a clinically significant LR with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.92. This study shows that ambulatory data could be used to identify a clinically significant response to levodopa. This study has also identified practical steps that would enhance the reliability of this test in future studies.
Introduction Essential tremor (ET) affects approximately 7 million people in the USA, yet public recognition of the disease and its impact remain low. Methods A retrospective observational study examined US claims data from 2015 to 2019 using the Compile database. ET diagnoses were captured using longitudinal data from 2015 to 2019 and for the year 2019, with diagnosis estimates extrapolated to the general US population. Confirmed ET was identified by an ET diagnosis code with at least two relevant prescriptions or by two diagnosis codes for ET and unspecified tremor at least 90 days apart. Comorbidity and treatment use data were extracted, and medication compliance and 2-year treatment persistence were assessed as measures of treatment adherence. Results A total of 1,336,183 patients with ET diagnoses codes were identified from 2015 through 2019, corresponding to 2,226,971 projected US diagnoses. In 2019, 128,263 patients had a confirmed ET diagnosis, corresponding to 213,772 projected US confirmed diagnoses. Of these, 96% had at least one comorbidity, and 64% received at least one pharmacologic treatment. Propranolol (24%) and primidone (20%) comprised the most common ET prescriptions. Two-year medication discontinuation rates were approximately 40%. Conclusion Our findings revealed that 1 million people were diagnosed and sought treatment for ET in the USA from 2015 to 2019. Projected population estimates of approximately 2 million people diagnosed suggest a further 1 million remain untreated. Our findings highlight the complexity of patient care in ET, complicated by delayed diagnoses, multiple comorbidities, and lack of effective and tolerable therapies that can mitigate treatment adherence limitations.