Probiotics, known to be live microorganisms, have been shown to improve or restore the gut microbiota, which in turn has been linked to improved health. It is believed that probiotics are the modern equivalent of a panacea, with claims that they may treat or prevent different diseases both in children and adults (e.g., from colic in babies to cardiovascular disease, respiratory infection, and cancer in adults). Ever since the early 2000s, probiotic-based fermented foods have had a resurgence in popularity, mostly due to claims made regarding their health benefits. Fermented foods have been associated with the prevention of irritable bowel syndrome, lactose intolerance, gastroenteritis, and obesity, but also other conditions such as chronic diarrhea, allergies, dermatitis, and bacterial and viral infections, all of which are closely related to an unhealthy lifestyle. Recent and ongoing developments in microbiome/microbiota science have given us new research directions for probiotics. The new types, mechanisms, and applications studied so far, and those currently under study, have a great potential to change scientific understanding of probiotics’ nutritional applications and human health care. The expansion of fields related to the study of the microbiome and the involvement of probiotics in its improvement foreshadow an era of significant changes. An expanding range of candidate probiotic species is emerging that can address newly elucidated data-driven microbial niches and host targets. In the probiotic field, new variants of microbiome-modulating interventions are being developed, including prebiotics, symbiotics, postbiotics, microbial consortia, live biotherapeutic products, and genetically modified organisms, with renewed interest in polyphenols, fibers, and fermented foods to ensure human health. This manuscript aims to analyze recent, emerging, and anticipated trends in probiotics (sources, doses, mechanism of action, diseases for which probiotics are administered, side effects, and risks) and create a vision for the development of related areas of influence in the field.

Background/Objectives: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a wide spectrum of extrahepatic manifestations, involving the immune, dermatologic, endocrine, vascular, and neuropsychiatric systems. Among these, mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CryoVas) remains one of the most clinically relevant complications. This work aims to provide a structured overview of HCV-related extrahepatic conditions and to analyze the clinical and virological outcomes of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in CryoVas patients. Methods: We first categorized and reviewed extrahepatic manifestations of HCV across five major domains: immune, inflammatory/metabolic/vascular, dermatological, thyroid, and neuropsychiatric. Subsequently, we conducted a comparative analysis of five clinical studies evaluating the impact of DAA therapy in patients with CryoVas. Data on demographics, clinical symptoms, treatment regimens, sustained virological response, and clinical response were extracted and summarized. Results: HCV was found to be associated with numerous extrahepatic conditions, including mixed cryoglobulinemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, autoimmune thyroiditis, insulin resistance, and neurocognitive symptoms. In the CryoVas subgroup analysis, virological response rates were uniformly high (88.9–100%), but clinical remission varied significantly. Complete response ranged from 39% to 90%, highlighting a discrepancy between viral eradication and extrahepatic symptom resolution. These findings underscore the need for individualized follow-up and further investigation into persistent immunological dysfunction post-sustained virological response (SVR). However, clinical outcomes were more variable: complete response (CR) varied between 39% and 90%, partial response (PR) ranged from 4% to 42%, and no response (NR) was reported in 0% to 40% of cases. Although significant improvement in key manifestations such as purpura, arthralgia, and neuropathy was frequently observed, a subset of patients continued to exhibit residual or refractory symptoms despite achieving SVR. Conclusions: HCV infection exerts multisystemic effects that extend beyond liver pathology. While DAAs offer near-universal virological clearance, the heterogeneous clinical response in CryoVas underscores the need for closer monitoring of extrahepatic outcomes. Future research should assess whether combining DAAs with immunomodulatory strategies can improve symptom control and long-term outcomes in patients with severe or refractory CryoVas.

Purpose: This article aims to harmonize the current data from the literature, describe baseline severity, and discuss potential treatment considerations for cases of triple infection. Patients and Methods: We undertook a retrospective, observational study on 1244 patients with viral hepatitis study subgroups: chronic replicative hepatitis with HCV—679 patients, HBV—98 patients, HBV/HCV—25 patients, HBV/HDV—14 patients, and 2 patients with triple-infection (HBV, HCV, and HDV), hospitalized in the Second Department of “Sf. Cuv. Parascheva” Infectious Diseases Clinical Hospital of Galați, Romania, between 1 April 2017 and 1 March 2025. Results: Comparative analysis of biochemical parameters and liver fibrosis—at the initial testing—i.e., at the beginning of the specific antiviral therapy—with direct-acting antivirals on HCV (DAAs) or nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs): Entecavir (ETV) or Tenofovir Disoproxyl fumarate (TDF), for HBV, Bulevirtide (BLV) for HDV—revealed clinical forms with higher severity in the case of triple and double infections, in comparison to individuals who have had only one hepatotropic virus infection. Conclusions: Compared to patients with a single hepatotropic viral infection, those with a double or triple infection had more severe hepatic damage. Concomitant therapy with Bulevirtide, DAAs, and NUCs is possible and the therapeutic results from clinical studies, with single-infection patients showing great potential for improving the prognosis of these patients.

Background/Objectives: The newly emergent COVID-19 pandemic involved primarily the respiratory system and had also major cardiovascular system (CVS) implications, revealed by acute myocardial infarction (AMI), arrhythmias, myocardial injury, and thromboembolism. CVS involvement is done through main mechanisms—direct and indirect heart muscle injury, with high mortality rates, worse short-term outcomes, and severe complications. AMI is the echo of myocardial injury (revealed by increases in CK, CK-MB, and troponin serum markers—which are taken into consideration as possible COVID-19 risk stratification markers). When studying myocardial injury, physicians can make use of imaging studies, such as cardiac MRI, transthoracic (or transesophageal) echocardiography, coronary angiography, cardiac computed tomography, and nuclear imaging (which have been used in cases where angiography was not possible), or even endomyocardial biopsy (which is not always available or feasible). Two-case-series presentations: We present the cases of two COVID-19 positive male patients who were admitted into the Clinical Department of Cardiology in “Sfântul Apostol Andrei” Emergency Clinical Hospital of Galați (Romania), who presented with acute cardiac distress symptoms and have been diagnosed with ST elevation AMI. The patients were 82 and 57 years old, respectively, with moderate and severe forms of COVID-19, and were diagnosed with anteroseptal left ventricular AMI and extensive anterior transmural left ventricular AMI (with ventricular fibrillation at presentation), respectively. The first patient was a non-smoker and non-drinker with no associated comorbidities, and was later discharged, while the second one died due to AMI complications. Conclusions: From this two-case series, we extract the following: old age alone is not a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes in COVID-19-related CVS events, and that the cumulative effects of several patient-associated risk factors (be it either for severe forms of COVID-19 and/or acute cardiac injury) will most probably lead to poor patient prognosis (death). At the same time, serum cardiac enzymes, dynamic ECG changes, along with newly developed echocardiographic modifications are indicators for poor prognosis in acute cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients with acute myocardial injury, regardless of the presence of right ventricular dysfunction (due to pulmonary hypertension).

Background/Objectives: This study was conducted in an infectious disease clinic in southeastern Romania on a cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. It aims to longitudinally evaluate biochemical parameters and the progression of liver fibrosis following treatment with direct-acting antivirals. Methods: One hundred eighty-one patients who experienced improvement in hepatic fibrosis 1–8 years after treatment (group A) were compared with eighty-six patients (except F0–F1) who had stable fibrosis or experienced worsening of hepatic fibrosis after antiviral treatment (group B). Results: The study demonstrated improvement and normalization of mean biochemical parameters in both groups, starting 4 weeks after initiation of therapy and remaining stable up to 5 years post-treatment. The only biochemical parameter that did not return to normal values was serum glucose, which showed elevated mean levels in both groups, with the highest values observed at 5 years post-treatment. Among all 267 patients, 181 (67.79%) showed improvement in hepatic fibrosis after DAA (direct-acting antivirals) therapy, 62 (23.22%) had stable fibrosis, and 24 (8.98%) experienced fibrosis worsening. Of those with improvement, 115 (63.53%) improved by one fibrosis stage, 49 (27.07%) by two stages, and 17 (9.39%) by three stages. Conclusions: This study highlights that more than half of Romanian HCV patients experienced regression of hepatic fibrosis and sustained normalization of most biochemical parameters up to 5 years after DAA treatment, confirming the long-term hepatic benefits of antiviral therapy.

Addictions are physical and/or psychological dependency disorders characterized by repetitive and compulsive behaviours in which the individual has difficulty controlling impulses. In this study, behaviours are defined as chronic alcohol or substance use. Thus, compulsions will generate negative consequences on a person's quality of life. Among the causes of addiction are genetic and biological factors, environmental factors, trauma, abuse, lack of emotional support, stress, social pressures, poor coping mechanisms, social and cultural factors. Material and method In this study, part of a larger study, 81 patients diagnosed with toxic-nutritional liver cirrhosis, chronic alcohol users, aged between 32 and 68 years were included. The study period was of two years, and anamnestic data (number of hospitalization days, hospitalization frequency) were collected for the period 2015-2022. In order to carry out the linear research, SPSS statistical software was used. Patients, after obtaining consent, were administered a psychological questionnaire designed to assess unconditional self-acceptance, based on the hypothesis that low self-tolerance generates self-destructive behaviours, i.e. addictions. Results The necessary statistical steps were followed in order to check the database and it was possible to obtain correlations between the number of hospitalization days, the hospitalization frequency and the scores obtained in the questionnaire. Finally, it was possible to generate a simple linear regression prediction with the number of hospitalisation days /inpatient frequency as the dependent variable and the test score as the independent variable. The results showed that as unconditional self-acceptance decreases (decreasing score), the hospitalization duration or the number of patient presentations to the doctor increases. Conclusions Unconditional self-acceptance, environmental tolerance, coping mechanisms have a major impact on the patient's well-being and compliance with treatment. Psychosomatic disorders accompany the addiction patient to a much greater extent than the diagnosis made by clinicians. This demonstrates the need for a diagnostic tool, the lack of collaboration with the psychiatrist, ultimately generating costs on the health system and reducing the quality of the patient’s life. In order to optimise the diagnosis, a tool within the clinician's reach (internal medicine doctor, gastroenterologist, etc.) and a real collaboration with the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist is necessary.