Abbas Asadi

Dr. Abbas Asadi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 February 2018 in Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rodrigo Ramirez-CampilloRodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
Cristian ÁlvarezCristian Álvarez
Cristian Álvarez
AGAntonio García-Hermoso
Antonio García-Hermoso
Robinson Ramírez-VélezRobinson Ramírez-Vélez
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez
Paulo GentilPaulo Gentil
Paulo Gentil
Mikel IzquierdoMikel Izquierdo
Mikel Izquierdo

13 January 2021 in BMC Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hamid AraziHamid Arazi
Hamid Arazi
PBParvin Babaei
Parvin Babaei
MMMakan Moghimi
Makan Moghimi
AAAbbas Asadi
Abbas Asadi
Background: Regarding an important effects of physical exercise on brain function in elders, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of strength and endurance exercise on brain neurobiological factors in older men. Methods: Thirty older men volunteered to participate in this study and were randomly assigned to strength, endurance and control groups. The subjects in strength group performed two circuits of resistance exercise (6 exercises with 10 repetition of 65–70% of one repetition maximum), while endurance group performed 30 min running with 65–70% of maximal heart rate. Blood was obtained pre and post-exercise to determine changes in serum BDNF, IGF-1 and platelets. Results: After exercise, both the strength and endurance groups showed significant increases in serum BDNF and IGF-1 concentrations and platelets at post-exercise and in comparison to control group (p < 0.05). In addition, no statistically significant differences were detected between the strength and endurance groups at post-exercise. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that both the strength and endurance interventions are effective in elevating BDNF, IGF-1, and platelets, without significant differences between them.


4 August 2017 in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hamid AraziHamid Arazi
Hamid Arazi
AKAbbas Keihaniyan
Abbas Keihaniyan
AEAmin Eatemadyboroujeni
Amin Eatemadyboroujeni
AOAmir Oftade
Amir Oftade
STSheida Takhsha
Sheida Takhsha
Rodrigo Ramirez-CampilloRodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two types of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) programs on aerobic and anaerobic capacity of female soccer players. Regional-level female athletes were randomly divided into heart rate-based HIIT (n = 8; age 23.4 ± 1.1 year) and speed-based HIIT groups (n = 8; age 23.4 ± 1.3 year). Athletes trained three days per week for six weeks. Before and after training, each athlete’s performance was assessed directly through the Hoff test, 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (VIFT), and repeated-sprint ability test (RAST); maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), power and fatigue were estimated indirectly. Both experimental groups improved power, fatigue index and VO2max after training (p < 0.05). It was noteworthy that the speed-based group had greater gains in minimal power (effect size (ES): 3.99 vs. 0.75), average power (ES: 2.23 vs. 0.33), and fatigue index (ES: 2.53 vs. 0.17) compared to heart rate-based group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, both heart rate-based and speed-based HIIT induced meaningful improvements in power, VO2max, and fatigue index in female soccer players, although the speed-based HIIT group achieved greater gains in power and fatigue index compared to the heart rate-based group.

1 January 2016 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAbbas Asadi
Abbas Asadi
Rodrigo Ramirez-CampilloRodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 6-week cluster versus traditional plyometric training sets on jumping ability, sprint and agility performance. Thirteen college students were assigned to a cluster sets group (N=6) or traditional sets group (N=7). Both training groups completed the same training program. The traditional group completed five sets of 20 repetitions with 2min of rest between sets each session, while the cluster group completed five sets of 20 [2×10] repetitions with 30/90-s rest each session. Subjects were evaluated for countermovement jump (CMJ), standing long jump (SLJ), t test, 20-m and 40-m sprint test performance before and after the intervention. Both groups had similar improvements (P<0.05) in CMJ, SLJ, t test, 20-m, and 40-m sprint. However, the magnitude of improvement in CMJ, SLJ and t test was greater for the cluster group (effect size [ES]=1.24, 0.81 and 1.38, respectively) compared to the traditional group (ES=0.84, 0.60 and 0.55). Conversely, the magnitude of improvement in 20-m and 40-m sprint test was greater for the traditional group (ES=1.59 and 0.96, respectively) compared to the cluster group (ES=0.94 and 0.75, respectively). Although both plyometric training methods improved lower body maximal-intensity exercise performance, the traditional sets methods resulted in greater adaptations in sprint performance, while the cluster sets method resulted in greater jump and agility adaptations.

1 September 2014 in Interventional Medicine and Applied Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Hamid AraziHamid Arazi
Hamid Arazi
MMMahdi Mohammadi
Mahdi Mohammadi
AAAbbas Asadi
Abbas Asadi
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of plyometric training on sand vs. land surface on muscular performance adaptations in men. Fourteen healthy men were randomly assigned to two training groups: a) Sand Depth Jump (SDJ; N = 7) and b) Land Depth Jump (LDJ; N = 7). Training was performed for 6 weeks and consisted of 5 × 20 repetitions of DJ training on 20-cm dry sand or 3-cm hard court surface twice weekly. Vertical Jump Test (VJT), Standing Long Jump Test (SLJT), 20-m and 40-m sprint, T-test (TT) and one repetition maximum leg press (1RMLP) were performed before and after training. Significant improvements in VJT [4 (ES = 0.63) vs. 5.4 (ES = 0.85) cm], SLJT [8.3 (ES = 0.3) vs. 12.7 (ES = 0.57) cm], and 1RMLP [23.5 (ES = 0.56) vs. 15.3 (ES = 0.49) kg] were seen for both the groups. Likewise, significant decreases were observed for both SDJ and LDJ groups in 20-m [0.3 (ES = 0.72) vs. 0.4 (ES = 1.98) s] and 40-m sprint times [0.2 (ES = 0.4) vs. 0.5 (ES = 0.71) s], and TT [0.5 (ES = 0.62) vs. 0.9 (ES = 0.57) s]. With regard to ES, it can be recommended that athletes used LDJ training for enhancing sprint and jump and SDJ training for improving agility and strength.