Yaobin Liu

Prof. Yaobin Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 April 2023 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XYXiaolu Yan
Xiaolu Yan
YLYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
ZHZenglin Han
Zenglin Han
XLXinyuan Li
Xinyuan Li
JZJingqiu Zhong
Jingqiu Zhong

19 September 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCShixi Cui
Shixi Cui
ZHZenglin Han
Zenglin Han
XYXiaolu Yan
Xiaolu Yan
XLXiuzhen Li
Xiuzhen Li
WZWenzhen Zhao
Wenzhen Zhao
JZJingqiu Zhong
Jingqiu Zhong
Integrating the flow of supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs) into the ecological security pattern (ESP) of coastal ecosystems with extremely fragile ecological backgrounds and contradictory human–land relationships is beneficial to the coordinated development of human–land systems. However, existing studies ignore the issue of scales of supply–demand linkages, making the ESP not properly guide sustainable development. Based on ESs delivery chain theory and landscape ecology approaches, we developed a sustainable development framework consisting of coupled microscopic natural–social systems. The method was tested using data from the Liao River Delta. In this study area, the natural supply potential and demand mapping distribution of key ESs were assessed to identify ecological sources in the Liao River Delta, a typical coastal zone in northern China. The resistance surface based on land use type assignment was modified using hydrological connectivity frequency and nighttime light intensity. Ecological corridors were extracted and optimized using a minimum cumulative resistance model and connectivity evaluation. The study found that the high supply area and the high demand reflection area are not consistent in location and supply level. Ecological source areas are evenly distributed, accounting for 12% of the total area. The ecological corridors are mainly concentrated in the west and southeast and do not cross the built-up areas in the east. This ESP framework safeguards the local demand for natural products and the natural potential to maintain services over the longer term and to a larger scale while informing the development of environmental management measures.

13 June 2024 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
Yaobin LiuYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
BGBiagio Fernando Giannetti
Biagio Fernando Giannetti
CACecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
Cecilia Maria Villas Boas de Almeida
GWGuoen Wei
Guoen Wei
XYXiaolu Yan
Xiaolu Yan

11 January 2024 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
XYXiaolu Yan
Xiaolu Yan
ZHZenglin Han
Zenglin Han
YLYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
XLXiuzhen Li
Xiuzhen Li
JZJingqiu Zhong
Jingqiu Zhong

XYXiaolu Yan
Xiaolu Yan
XLXinyuan Li
Xinyuan Li
YLYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
JLJiawei Li
Jiawei Li
JZJingqiu Zhong
Jingqiu Zhong
Ecosystem service (ES) bundles can be defined as the temporal and spatial co-occurrence of ESs. ES bundles are jointly driven by socio-ecological factors and form at different scales. However, in recent research, a few studies have analyzed the dynamic evolution and driving mechanisms of ES bundles at different scales. Therefore, this study explored the spatial patterns of six ESs supplied in Dalian (China) from 2005 to 2015 at three spatial scales, determining the distribution and evolution patterns of ES bundles and their responses to socio-ecological driving factors. Our results are as follows: (1) We identified four ES bundles representing ecological conservation, water conservation, ecological depletion, and food supply. The developmental trajectory of each ES bundle could be attributed to the combined effects of environmental conditions and urban expansion. In particular, the water conservation bundle and food supply bundle were changed to the ecological depletion bundle. Given the ongoing urbanization, the conflict between ESs has intensified. (2) The impact of socio-ecological driving factors on ES bundles vary with scale. At three spatial scales, the digital elevation model (DEM) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) had a great impact on ES bundles. Urbanization indicators also strongly explain the spatial distribution of ES bundles at the county and grid scales. The interaction factor detector shows that there is no combination of mutual weakening, indicating that the formation of ES bundles is driven by multiple factors in Dalian. Overall, this study used a more holistic approach to manage the ecosystem by studying the temporal-spatial dynamics of the multiple ESs.

29 April 2024 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNan Huang
Nan Huang
YLYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
Yaobin LiuYaobin Liu
Yaobin Liu
BGBiagio Fernando Giannetti
Biagio Fernando Giannetti
LBLing Bai
Ling Bai
Exploring the impact of economic modernization on carbon balance is an essential endeavor to achieve carbon neutrality and combat climate change. However, the spatial impact of economic modernization on carbon balance remains ambiguous. Therefore, this study aims to explore the spatial spillover effects of agricultural modernization, industrialization, and urbanization on carbon balance during the economic modernization process in China, taking 30 provinces and cities in China as examples from 2010 to 2021. This study utilizes the spatial Durbin model to derive the following results: In the past decade, the carbon balance ratio has shown a fluctuating and decreasing dynamic evolution trend. There is an increase in regions with serious carbon deficits. Further investigation into the spatial spillover effect of carbon balance unveils that for every 1% increase in the carbon balance ratio of a province, neighboring provinces experience a decrease of 0.833%. Additionally, the spatial spillover effects of the three modernizations in China on the carbon balance ratio behave differently. Agricultural modernization and urbanization demonstrate negative spatial spillover effects on the carbon balance in neighboring regions, while industrialization exerts a significant positive spatial spillover effect on the carbon balance of neighboring regions. Regarding control variables, the level of innovation solely contributes to local carbon balance realization without generating a trickle-down effect, whereas infrastructure development operates inversely. At the same time, there are differences in the spatial effects of agricultural modernization and industrialization on the carbon balance between the eastern region and the central and western regions. The study underscores the importance of economic modernization and development processes focusing on fostering synergistic growth between economic and environmental benefits within both local and neighboring areas.