Background: Usher syndrome (USH), the most common cause of combined deaf-blindness, is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous disorder characterized by congenital hearing impairment and progressive vision loss due to rod-cone dystrophy. Although the original classification in three subtypes (USH I, USH II, and USH III) is still valid, recent findings have changed and widened perspectives in its classification, genotype–phenotype correlations, and management strategies: Objective: This study aims to provide new insights into the classification of Usher syndrome, explore the genotype-phenotype correlations, and review current and emerging management strategies. Methods: A comprehensive literature review has been conducted, incorporating data from clinical studies, genetic databases, and patient registries. Results: Recent studies have led to the identification of several novel pathogenic variants in the USH genes, leading to refined subclassifications of Usher syndrome. Interactions between different genes being part of the network of this ciliopathy have been investigated and new mechanisms unveiled. Significant correlations were found between certain genotypes and the presentation of both auditory and visual phenotypes. For instance, pathogenic variants in the MYO7A gene (USH1B) were generally associated with more severe hearing impairment and earlier onset of retinal dystrophy, if compared to other USH genes-related forms. Other genes, such as USH1G, traditionally considered as causing a specific subtype, can display phenotypic heterogeneity in some patients. Conclusions: This review provides insights into a better understanding of Usher syndrome that considers recent findings regarding its genetic causes and clinical features. Precise genotype–phenotype correlations can lead to better genetic counselling, more precise characterization of the natural history of the condition, and a personalized and effective management approach. Recent progress has been made in research into gene-specific therapies that appear promising for improving the quality of life for individuals affected by Usher syndrome.
Glaucoma is traditionally classified as an ocular disease characterized by progressive retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss and optic nerve damage. However, emerging evidence suggests that its pathophysiology may extend beyond the eye, involving trans-synaptic neurodegeneration along the visual pathway and structural changes within central brain regions, including the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex. In this narrative review, we have used the phrase ‘brain involvement’ to underscore central changes that accompany or follow retinal ganglion cell loss; we have not intended to redefine glaucoma as a primary cerebral disorder. Neuroimaging studies and neurocognitive assessments in adult glaucoma patients, primarily older individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma reveal that glaucoma patients may exhibit alterations in brain connectivity and cortical thinning, aligning it more closely with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. This evolving neurocentric perspective raises important questions regarding shared mechanisms—such as mitochondrial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and impaired axonal transport—that may link glaucomatous optic neuropathy to central nervous system (CNS) pathology. These insights open promising therapeutic avenues, including the repurposing of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative agents, targeting not only intraocular pressure (IOP) but also broader CNS pathways. Furthermore, neuroimaging biomarkers and brain-targeted interventions may play a future role in diagnosis, prognosis, and individualized treatment. This review synthesizes current evidence supporting glaucoma as a CNS disease, explores the mechanistic overlap with neurodegeneration, and discusses the potential clinical implications of glaucoma within a neuro-ophthalmologic paradigm.
Pericytes, specialized mural cells surrounding microvessels, play a crucial role in maintaining vascular homeostasis and function across various organs, including the eye. These versatile cells regulate blood flow, support the integrity of the blood–retinal barrier, and contribute to angiogenesis. Recent advancements in molecular and cellular biology have revealed the heterogeneity of pericytes and their critical involvement in ocular physiology and pathology. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of pericyte functions in ocular health and their implications in diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and retinal vein occlusion. Pericyte dysfunction is implicated in vascular instability, neurovascular coupling failure, inflammation, and pathological neovascularization, contributing to vision-threatening disorders. The review further explores recent findings on pericyte-targeted therapies, including pharmacological agents, gene therapy, and cell-based approaches, aiming to restore pericyte function and preserve ocular health.
Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is defined as a “genetically complex trait”, where modifying factors act on a genetic predisposing background. For the majority of glaucomatous conditions, DNA variants are not sufficient to explain pathogenesis. Some genes are clearly underlying the more “Mendelian” forms, while a growing number of related polymorphisms in other genes have been identified in recent years. Environmental, dietary, or biological factors are known to influence the development of the condition, but interactions between these factors and the genetic background are poorly understood. Several studies conducted in recent years have led to evidence that epigenetics, that is, changes in the pattern of gene expression without any changes in the DNA sequence, appear to be the missing link. Different epigenetic mechanisms have been proven to lead to glaucomatous changes in the eye, principally DNA methylation, post-translational histone modification, and RNA-associated gene regulation by non-coding RNAs. The aim of this work is to define the principal epigenetic actors in glaucoma pathogenesis. The identification of such mechanisms could potentially lead to new perspectives on therapeutic strategies.
Mitochondrial dysfunction represents a central hallmark of aging and a broad spectrum of chronic diseases, ranging from metabolic to neurodegenerative and ocular disorders. Nicotinamide riboside (NR), a vitamin B3 derivative and efficient precursor of NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), and berberine (BBR), an isoquinoline alkaloid widely investigated in metabolic regulation, have independently emerged as promising mitochondrial modulators. NR enhances cellular NAD+ pools, thereby activating sirtuin-dependent pathways, stimulating PGC-1α–mediated mitochondrial biogenesis, and triggering the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt). BBR, by contrast, primarily activates AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) and interacts with respiratory complex I, improving bioenergetics, reducing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, and promoting mitophagy and organelle quality control. Importantly, despite distinct upstream mechanisms, NR and BBR converge on shared signaling pathways that support mitochondrial health, including redox balance, metabolic flexibility, and immunometabolic regulation. Unlike previous reviews addressing these compounds separately, this article integrates current preclinical and clinical findings to provide a unified perspective on their converging actions. We critically discuss translational opportunities as well as limitations, including heterogeneous clinical outcomes and the need for robust biomarkers of mitochondrial function. By outlining overlapping and complementary mechanisms, we highlight NR and BBR as rational combinatorial strategies to restore mitochondrial resilience. This integrative perspective may guide the design of next-generation clinical trials and advance precision approaches in mitochondrial medicine.
Glaucoma remains a leading cause of irreversible blindness. We reviewed more than 150 peer-reviewed studies (January 2019–July 2025) that applied artificial or augmented intelligence (AI/AuI) to glaucoma care. Deep learning systems analyzing fundus photographs or OCT volumes routinely achieved area-under-the-curve values around 0.95 and matched—or exceeded—subspecialists in prospective tests. Sequence-aware models detected visual field worsening up to 1.7 years earlier than conventional linear trends, while a baseline multimodal network integrating OCT, visual field, and clinical data predicted the need for incisional surgery with AUROC 0.92. Offline smartphone triage in community clinics reached sensitivities near 94% and specificities between 86% and 94%, illustrating feasibility in low-resource settings. Large language models answered glaucoma case questions with specialist-level accuracy but still require human oversight. Key obstacles include algorithmic bias, workflow integration, and compliance with emerging regulations, such as the EU AI Act and FDA GMLP. With rigorous validation, bias auditing, and transparent change control, AI/AuI can augment—rather than replace—clinician expertise, enabling earlier intervention, tailored therapy, and more equitable access to glaucoma care worldwide.