John J. Tanner

Prof. John J. Tanner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCChen Chen
Chen Chen
JHJie Hou
Jie Hou
JTJohn J. Tanner
John J. Tanner
Jianlin ChengJianlin Cheng
Jianlin Cheng
Recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics have enabled tremendous progress in the understanding of cellular mechanisms, disease progression, and the relationship between genotype and phenotype. Though many popular bioinformatics methods in proteomics are derived from other omics studies, novel analysis strategies are required to deal with the unique characteristics of proteomics data. In this review, we discuss the current developments in the bioinformatics methods used in proteomics and how they facilitate the mechanistic understanding of biological processes. We first introduce bioinformatics software and tools designed for mass spectrometry-based protein identification and quantification, and then we review the different statistical and machine learning methods that have been developed to perform comprehensive analysis in proteomics studies. We conclude with a discussion of how quantitative protein data can be used to reconstruct protein interactions and signaling networks.

27 November 2021 in Briefings in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ashwin DhakalAshwin Dhakal
Ashwin Dhakal
CMCole McKay
Cole McKay
JTJohn J. Tanner
John J. Tanner
Jianlin ChengJianlin Cheng
Jianlin Cheng
New drug production, from target identification to marketing approval, takes over 12 years and can cost around $2.6 billion. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled the urgent need for more powerful computational methods for drug discovery. Here, we review the computational approaches to predicting protein–ligand interactions in the context of drug discovery, focusing on methods using artificial intelligence (AI). We begin with a brief introduction to proteins (targets), ligands (e.g. drugs) and their interactions for nonexperts. Next, we review databases that are commonly used in the domain of protein–ligand interactions. Finally, we survey and analyze the machine learning (ML) approaches implemented to predict protein–ligand binding sites, ligand-binding affinity and binding pose (conformation) including both classical ML algorithms and recent deep learning methods. After exploring the correlation between these three aspects of protein–ligand interaction, it has been proposed that they should be studied in unison. We anticipate that our review will aid exploration and development of more accurate ML-based prediction strategies for studying protein–ligand interactions.

3 July 2015 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAnna T. Gres
Anna T. Gres
KKKaren Kirby
Karen Kirby
VKVineet N. KewalRamani
Vineet N. KewalRamani
JTJohn J. Tanner
John J. Tanner
OPOwen Pornillos
Owen Pornillos
SSStefan Sarafianos
Stefan Sarafianos
Retroviral capsids in their native form: Capsid proteins of retroviruses form protective lattices around viral RNA molecules. The precise molecular details of how individual, full-length capsid proteins assemble to shield the viral genome; however, are not well understood. Obal et al. and Gres et al. now report high resolution crystal structures of the full length capsid proteins from Bovine Leukemia Virus and HIV-1, respectively. The two studies complement each other to reveal the dynamic nature of capsid protein assembly and of how individual capsid proteins interact in the lattice. The findings may have relevance for drug design. Science , this issue p. 95 ; see also p. 99

1 July 2011 in Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJohn J. Tanner
John J. Tanner
ZPZachary D. Parsons
Zachary D. Parsons
ACAndrea H. Cummings
Andrea H. Cummings
HZHaiying Zhou
Haiying Zhou
KGKent S. Gates
Kent S. Gates
Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are important targets of the H 2 O 2 that is produced during mammalian signal transduction. H 2 O 2 -mediated inactivation of PTPs also may be important in various pathophysiological conditions involving oxidative stress. Here we review the chemical and structural biology of redox-regulated PTPs. Reactions of H 2 O 2 with PTPs convert the catalytic cysteine thiol to a sulfenic acid. In PTPs, the initially generated sulfenic acid residues have the potential to undergo secondary reactions with a neighboring amide nitrogen or cysteine thiol residue to yield a sulfenyl amide or disulfide, respectively. The chemical mechanisms by which formation of sulfenyl amide and disulfide linkages can protect the catalytic cysteine residue against irreversible overoxidation to sulfinic and sulfonic oxidation states are described. Due to the propensity for back-door and distal cysteine residues to engage with the active-site cysteine after oxidative inactivation, differences in the structures of the oxidatively inactivated PTPs may stem, to a large degree, from differences in the number and location of cysteine residues surrounding the active site of the enzymes. PTPs with key cysteine residues in structurally similar locations may be expected to share similar mechanisms of oxidative inactivation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 15, 77–97.

12 April 2018 in Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJohn J. Tanner
John J. Tanner
SFSarah-Maria Fendt
Sarah-Maria Fendt
DBDonald Becker
Donald Becker

22 February 2006 in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JJJermaine L. Jenkins
Jermaine L. Jenkins
JTJohn J. Tanner
John J. Tanner