Recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics have enabled tremendous progress in the understanding of cellular mechanisms, disease progression, and the relationship between genotype and phenotype. Though many popular bioinformatics methods in proteomics are derived from other omics studies, novel analysis strategies are required to deal with the unique characteristics of proteomics data. In this review, we discuss the current developments in the bioinformatics methods used in proteomics and how they facilitate the mechanistic understanding of biological processes. We first introduce bioinformatics software and tools designed for mass spectrometry-based protein identification and quantification, and then we review the different statistical and machine learning methods that have been developed to perform comprehensive analysis in proteomics studies. We conclude with a discussion of how quantitative protein data can be used to reconstruct protein interactions and signaling networks.

Background: Driven by deep learning, inter-residue contact/distance prediction has been significantly improved and substantially enhanced ab initio protein structure prediction. Currently, most of the distance prediction methods classify inter-residue distances into multiple distance intervals instead of directly predicting real-value distances. The output of the former has to be converted into real-value distances to be used in tertiary structure prediction. Results: To explore the potentials of predicting real-value inter-residue distances, we develop a multi-task deep learning distance predictor (DeepDist) based on new residual convolutional network architectures to simultaneously predict real-value inter-residue distances and classify them into multiple distance intervals. Tested on 43 CASP13 hard domains, DeepDist achieves comparable performance in real-value distance prediction and multi-class distance prediction. The average mean square error (MSE) of DeepDist’s real-value distance prediction is 0.896 Ų when filtering out the predicted distance ≥ 16 Å, which is lower than 1.003 Ų of DeepDist’s multi-class distance prediction. When distance predictions are converted into contact predictions at 8 Å threshold (the standard threshold in the field), the precision of top L/5 and L/2 contact predictions of DeepDist’s multi-class distance prediction is 79.3% and 66.1%, respectively, higher than 78.6% and 64.5% of its real-value distance prediction and the best results in the CASP13 experiment. Conclusions: DeepDist can predict inter-residue distances well and improve binary contact prediction over the existing state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, the predicted real-value distances can be directly used to reconstruct protein tertiary structures better than multi-class distance predictions due to the lower MSE. Finally, we demonstrate that predicting the real-value distance map and multi-class distance map at the same time performs better than predicting real-value distances alone.

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) allows a macromolecular structure such as protein-DNA/RNA complexes to be reconstructed in a three-dimensional coulomb potential map. The structural information of these macromolecular complexes forms the foundation for understanding the molecular mechanism including many human diseases. However, the model building of large macromolecular complexes is often difficult and time-consuming. We recently developed DeepTracer-2.0, an artificial-intelligence-based pipeline that can build amino acid and nucleic acid backbones from a single cryo-EM map, and even predict the best-fitting residues according to the density of side chains. The experiments showed improved accuracy and efficiency when benchmarking the performance on independent experimental maps of protein-DNA/RNA complexes and demonstrated the promising future of macromolecular modeling from cryo-EM maps. Our method and pipeline could benefit researchers worldwide who work in molecular biomedicine and drug discovery, and substantially increase the throughput of the cryo-EM model building. The pipeline has been integrated into the web portal https://deeptracer.uw.edu/.

Understanding the protein structures is invaluable in various biomedical applications, such as vaccine development. Protein structure model building from experimental electron density maps is a time-consuming and labor-intensive task. To address the challenge, machine learning approaches have been proposed to automate this process. Currently, the majority of the experimental maps in the database lack atomic resolution features, making it challenging for machine learning-based methods to precisely determine protein structures from cryogenic electron microscopy density maps. On the other hand, protein structure prediction methods, such as AlphaFold2, leverage evolutionary information from protein sequences and have recently achieved groundbreaking accuracy. However, these methods often require manual refinement, which is labor intensive and time consuming. In this study, we present DeepTracer-Refine, an automated method that refines AlphaFold predicted structures by aligning them to DeepTracers modeled structure. Our method was evaluated on 39 multi-domain proteins and we improved the average residue coverage from 78.2 to 90.0% and average local Distance Difference Test score from 0.67 to 0.71. We also compared DeepTracer-Refine with Phenixs AlphaFold refinement and demonstrated that our method not only performs better when the initial AlphaFold model is less precise but also surpasses Phenix in run-time performance.

Motivation: Driven by deep learning techniques, inter-residue contact/distance prediction has been significantly improved and substantially enhanced ab initio protein structure prediction. Currently all the distance prediction methods classify inter-residue distances into multiple distance intervals (i.e. a multi-classification problem) instead of directly predicting real-value distances (i.e. a regression problem). The output of the former has to be converted into real-value distances in order to be used in tertiary structure prediction. Results: To explore the potentials of predicting real-value inter-residue distances, we develop a multi-task deep learning distance predictor (DeepDist) based on new residual convolutional network architectures to simultaneously predict real-value inter-residue distances and classify them into multiple distance intervals. We demonstrate that predicting the real-value distance map and multi-class distance map at the same time performs better than predicting real-value distances alone, indicating their complementarity. On 43 CASP13 hard domains, the average mean square error (MSE) of DeepDist’s real-value distance predictions is 0.896 Å when filtering out the predicted distance >=16 Å, which is lower than 1.003 Å of DeepDist’s multi-class distance predictions. When the predicted real-value distances are converted to binary contact predictions at 8Å threshold, the precisions of top L/5 and L/2 contact predictions are 78.6% and 64.5%, respectively, higher than the best results reported in the CASP13 experiment. These results demonstrate that the real-value distance prediction can predict inter-residue distances well and improve binary contact prediction over the existing state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, the predicted real-value distances can be directly used to reconstruct protein tertiary structures better than multi-class distance predictions due to the lower MSE.

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) plays a vital role in various biological processes and forms intricate secondary and tertiary structures associated with its functions. Predicting RNA secondary structures is essential for understanding the functional and regulatory roles of RNA molecules in biological processes. Traditional free-energy-based methods for predicting these structures often fail to capture complex interactions and long-range dependencies within RNA sequences. Recent advancements in machine learning, particularly with graph neural networks (GNNs), have shown promise in enhancing the ability to model the relationships between molecular sequences and their structures. This work specifically explores the efficacy of various GNN architectures in modeling RNA secondary structure. Through benchmarking the GNN methods against traditional energy-based models on standard datasets, our analysis demonstrates that GNN models improves traditional methods, offering a robust framework for accurate RNA structure prediction.