Background: Malnutrition is a worldwide problem that impacts every country, affecting one in three individuals, including Ghana. According to estimates from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 690 million people were undernourished globally in 2019. Malnutrition is no exception in rural cocoa communities in Ghana. The expansion of cocoa is causing food insecurity and low dietary diversity in most cocoa-growing areas. There is little information on the food security status and dietary diversity among male-headed and female-headed cocoa households in the Juaboso-Bia cocoa landscape. Thus, this study sought to explore the dietary diversity distribution, food security status, sources of staple food, food unavailability periods, food production status, themes contributing to low dietary diversity and food insecurity, and perception of the impact of cocoa expansion on crop diversification among male-headed and female-headed cocoa households in the study area. Methods: Both quantitative and qualitative research methods were employed to address the research questions. The study collected 200 semi-structured questionnaire data and 14 in-depth interview data from cocoa household heads in the Juaboso-Bia landscape. The survey data was cleaned and analysis, such as household dietary diversity status, food security status, and binary logistic regression were performed in the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS). The in-depth interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Through this study, it was revealed that 62.8% of the male-headed cocoa households had medium to high dietary diversity compared to their female counterparts 39.3%. About 47.9% of the male-headed households were food secure than the female-headed households (29.1%). Moreover, the months that both male and female-headed households recalled facing severe food unavailability were July and June. In addition, climate change/variability, unavailable lands, poverty, large household size, and gender stereotypes were themes promoting low dietary diversity and food insecurity among male and female-headed households. Furthermore, sex, total household income, and cropland conversion to cocoa were the variables influencing household heads’ perception of the impact of cocoa expansion on crop diversification. Conclusions: The study showed that the male-headed cocoa households had high dietary diversity and were food secure than the female-headed cocoa households, lending credence to the conceptual framework applied in this study. There is a significant relationship between household head gender and food security status. Therefore, this study recommends the following interventions to improve dietary diversity and food security among male and female-headed cocoa households: raise awareness about the need for diverse diets and provide practical information on how to incorporate a greater variety of food groups into their daily meals; and promote gender equity and inclusivity in food security interventions. Future research could investigate how gender mainstreaming policies in agriculture have helped empower and improve the food security of female-headed households in Ghana.

United States (U.S.) specialty crop growers face myriad decisions regarding substrate selection as sustainability, market demands, and resource limitations influence soilless production systems. Peat is a common component in container substrates despite public concerns about its limited availability, finite supply, and associations with greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts, which have prompted growers to seek alternative materials. However, limited research has focused on the experiences, challenges, and research needs of U.S. specialty crop growers related to substrate transitions. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore growers’ key considerations, research interests, and preferred communication methods associated with substrate transitions. An online survey and three focus groups were used to gain insights into growers’ experiences, concerns, and perceived impacts of peat replacement, research needs, and preferred communication channels. Results indicated that financial costs, peat availability, access to peat alternative substrates, and environmental considerations were the main factors influencing potential changes in substrate use. Growers identified key research priorities to assist decision-making, including (1) irrigation and nutrient management strategies, (2) the economic performance of alternative substrates, and (3) locally validated trials demonstrating system compatibility. They preferred practical communication methods for sharing results, including websites, YouTube videos, in-person meetings, on-farm demonstrations, and short podcasts accessible during routine work hours. The findings implied that research, outreach, and communication efforts tailored to growers’ operational contexts will support informed substrate transitions.