Drought, an increasingly prevalent climate stressor due to global warming, profoundly impacts agricultural systems, particularly the soil microbiome. Soil microorganisms are crucial for nutrient cycling, plant health, and ecosystem stability; however, drought-induced changes disrupt microbial community structure, function, and interactions with plants. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the effects of drought on soil microbiomes, with a focus on microbial diversity, resilience, and functional shifts in agricultural contexts. It highlights key microbial mechanisms underpinning plant drought tolerance, including symbioses with plant growth-promoting bacteria and fungi. Furthermore, it addresses knowledge gaps in the long-term effects of repeated drought events, microbial adaptations, and plant–soil feedback mechanisms. By advancing our understanding of drought–microbiome dynamics, this review aims to inform sustainable agricultural practices and resilience strategies to mitigate the adverse impacts of drought on crop productivity and ecosystem health.

Healthy soils provide the foundation for sustainable agriculture. However, soil health degradation has been a significant challenge for agricultural sustainability and environmental quality in water-limited environments, such as arid and semi-arid regions. Soils in these regions is often characterized by low soil organic matter (SOM), poor fertility, and low overall productivity, thus limiting the ability to build SOM. Soil health assessment frameworks developed for more productive, humid, temperate environments typically emphasize building SOM as a key to soil health and have identified the best management practices that are often difficult to implement in regions with water limitations. This study reviewed existing soil health assessment frameworks to assess their potential relevance for water-limited environments and highlights the need to develop a framework that links soil health with key ecosystem functions in dry climates. It also discusses management strategies for improving soil health, including tillage and residue management, organic amendments, and cropping system diversification and intensification. The assessment of indicators sensitive to water management practices could provide valuable information in designing soil health assessment frameworks for arid and semi-arid regions. The responses of soil health indicators are generally greater when multiple complementary soil health management practices are integrated, leading to the resilience and sustainability of agriculture in water-limited environments.

Core Ideas: The soil organic C dynamics and net ecosystem C balance of five dryland cropping systems were compared. Conservation systems stored up to 15% more soil organic C than conventional system. Net ecosystem C balance was positive with cover cropping. Cover crops and conservation tillage are crucial for soil C storage in drylands. Biomass C inputs often limit agroecosystem C dynamics, nutrient cycling, and soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in semiarid drylands. This study evaluated SOC and net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of five cropping systems in the drylands of the Southern Great Plains. Cropping systems evaluated included corn (Zea mays)–sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] rotation with conventional tillage without cover cropping (CTNC), strip tillage with and without cover cropping (STCC and STNC, respectively), and no tillage with and without cover cropping (NTCC and NTNC, respectively). After 4 yr of experimental tillage, we measured CO₂ emissions, soil and soil surface air temperatures, soil moisture content, potentially mineralizable carbon (PMC), total SOC, total nitrogen (TN), and net primary productivity (NPP). Conservation systems (any treatments including no‐till, strip till, or cover crops) had 5 to 6°C lower soil temperature and 2.8 to 4.9°C lower soil surface air temperature and stored 2.3 to 3.9% more soil moisture content than CTNC. Conservation systems also stored 15.2% more SOC than CTNC. Cropping systems that integrated cover crops in the rotation (STCC and NTCC) had greater NPP and positive NECB. Regardless of tillage management, cover cropping had a greater NECB, including SOC (NECB_SOC) than CTNC. Reducing tillage and diversifying cropping systems through cover cropping can benefit semiarid dryland agroecosystems by increasing SOC storage and maintaining positive NECB.