Giorgio Ercolani

Prof. Giorgio Ercolani

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2013 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAlessandro Cucchetti
Alessandro Cucchetti
FPFabio Piscaglia
Fabio Piscaglia
MCMatteo Cescon
Matteo Cescon
ACAntonio Colecchia
Antonio Colecchia
Giorgio ErcolaniGiorgio Ercolani
Giorgio Ercolani
APAntonio D. Pinna
Antonio D. Pinna

11 November 2008 in American Journal of Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matteo RavaioliMatteo Ravaioli
Matteo Ravaioli
Gian Luca GraziGian Luca Grazi
Gian Luca Grazi
FPFabio Piscaglia
Fabio Piscaglia
FTF. Trevisani
F. Trevisani
MCM. Cescon
M. Cescon
APA. D. Pinna
A. D. Pinna
Conventional criteria for liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are single HCC ≤ 5 cm or less than or equal to three HCCs ≤ 3 cm. We prospectively evaluated the possibility of slightly extending these criteria in a down-staging protocol, which included patients initially outside conventional criteria: single HCC 5–6 cm or two HCCs ≤ 5 cm or less than six HCCs ≤ 4 cm and sum diameter ≤ 12 cm, but within Milan criteria in the active tumors after the down-staging procedures. The outcome of patients down-staged was compared to that of Milan criteria after liver transplantation and since the first evaluation according to an intention-to-treat principle. From 2003 to 2006, 177 patients with HCC were considered for transplantation: the transplantation rate was comparable between the Milan and down-staging groups: 88/129 cases (68%) versus 32/48 cases (67%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 2.5 years after transplantation, the 1 and 3 years' disease-free survival rates were comparable: 80% and 71% in the Milan group versus 78% and 71% in the down-staging. The actuarial intention-to-treat survival was 27/48 patients (56.3%) in the down-staging and 81/129 cases (62.8%) in the Milan group, p = n.s. The proposed down-staging criteria provide a comparable outcome to the conventional criteria.

1 July 2001 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gian Luca GraziGian Luca Grazi
Gian Luca Grazi
Giorgio ErcolaniGiorgio Ercolani
Giorgio Ercolani
FPFilippo Pierangeli
Filippo Pierangeli
MGMassimo Del Gaudio
Massimo Del Gaudio
MCMatteo Cescon
Matteo Cescon
AMAlighieri Mazziotti
Alighieri Mazziotti
To review a single-center experience to update the performance indexes of liver resection (LR). Several therapies have been proposed in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on cirrhosis, although LR was the first to be widely applied. Of 408 patients with cirrhosis admitted for HCC in the period 1983 to 1998, 264 had a LR. Patient selection, surgical technique, 30-day deaths, long-term survival, recurrence rate, and recurrence treatment were reviewed after stratifying patients according to the year of surgery. Mean follow-up was 34.5 ± 29.1 months. The number of Child A patients who underwent surgery after the discovery of the tumor at routine evaluation increased significantly from 64.5% to 87.9% during the study period. Procedures carried out without blood transfusions increased from 31.4% to 76.9%. The overall operative death rate was 4.9%. Actuarial survival rates were 63.1% and 41.1% after 3 and 5 years, respectively; actuarial tumor-free survival rates were 49.3% and 27.9% at the same intervals. After 1992, surgical deaths decreased from 9.3% to 1.3%. Actuarial survival rates increased from 52.9% and 32.3% to 71.7% and 49.4% after 3 and 5 years, respectively. There was no difference in the actuarial recurrence rate between the two periods, but the chance to treat recurrence increased over time from 22.4% to 53.7% with a concomitant, significant improvement in survival. LR represents a well-established therapy for HCC on cirrhosis. It remains one of the fundamentals in the multidisciplinary approach to this tumor and should be considered as the first option for patients with preserved hepatic function and limited disease. Today, LR should offer a surgical death rate of less than 1.5%, a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%, and a 5-year tumor-free survival rate of 28% when performed in specialized centers.

5 April 2006 in Liver Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAlessandro Cucchetti
Alessandro Cucchetti
Giorgio ErcolaniGiorgio Ercolani
Giorgio Ercolani
MVMarco Vivarelli
Marco Vivarelli
MCMatteo Cescon
Matteo Cescon
MRMatteo Ravaioli
Matteo Ravaioli
APAntonio Daniele Pinna
Antonio Daniele Pinna
The objective of this study was to predict postoperative liver failure and morbidity after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhosis. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is currently accepted as a disease severity index of cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation; however, its impact on prognosis after resection of HCC on cirrhosis has never been investigated. One hundred fifty-four cirrhotic patients resected in a tertiary care setting for HCC were retrospectively analyzed. For each patient, the MELD score was calculated and related to postoperative liver failure and complications (morbidity). Hospital stay and 1-year survival was also investigated. MELD accuracy in predicting postoperative liver failure and morbidity of cirrhotic patients was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Eleven patients (7.1%) experienced postoperative liver failure leading to death or transplantation. ROC analysis identified cirrhotic patients with a MELD score equal to or above 11 at high risk for postoperative liver failure (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87–0.96; sensitivity = 82%; specificity = 89%). Forty-six patients (29.9%) developed at least 1 postoperative complication: ROC analysis identified patients with a MELD score equal to or above 9 at major risk for postoperative complications (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.78–0.89; sensitivity = 87%; specificity = 63%). Cirrhotic patients with MELD score below 9 had no postoperative liver failure and low morbidity (8.1%). In conclusion, the MELD score can accurately predict postoperative liver failure and morbidity of cirrhotic patients referred for resection of HCC and should be used to select the best candidates for hepatectomy. Liver Transpl 12:966–971, 2006. © 2006 AASLD.

1 January 2012 in Archives of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GNGennaro Nuzzo
Gennaro Nuzzo
FGFELICE GIULIANTE
FELICE GIULIANTE
Francesco ArditoFrancesco Ardito
Francesco Ardito
IGIvo Giovannini
Ivo Giovannini
LALuca Aldrighetti
Luca Aldrighetti
BFBruno Federico
Bruno Federico
Research from JAMA Surgery — Improvement in Perioperative and Long-term Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma — Results of an Italian Multicenter Analysis of 440 Patients

1 June 2009 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matteo CesconMatteo Cescon
Matteo Cescon
GVGaetano Vetrone
Gaetano Vetrone
Gian Luca GraziGian Luca Grazi
Gian Luca Grazi
GRGiovanni Ramacciato
Giovanni Ramacciato
Giorgio ErcolaniGiorgio Ercolani
Giorgio Ercolani
APAntonio Daniele Pinna
Antonio Daniele Pinna
Objective: To estimate risk factors affecting the early outcome after hepatic resection in a high volume center specialized in hepatobiliary surgery and to analyze the changing of results during 3 different periods of treatment. Design: Retrospective review. Patients: A series of 1500 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection. Methods: Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analyzed in relation to indications for surgery, period of operation, patient characteristics, and intraoperative variables. Patients were classified into 4 groups, according to the indication for surgery: primary liver tumors with cirrhosis (group 1, G1); other liver malignancies (group 2, G2); biliary malignancies (group 3, G3); and benign diseases (group 4, G4). Patients were also divided into 3 groups, according to the year of operation (period 1: June 1985 to October 1993; period 2: November 1993 to September 1999; period 3: October 1999 to September 2007). Results: Overall mortality and morbidity were 3% and 22.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that blood transfusions, G1, and additional procedures were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, whereas blood transfusions, G1, G3, and extended hepatectomy were associated with an increased risk of postoperative mortality. G1 decreased, whereas G3, extended hepatectomies and additional procedures significantly increased between periods 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). The complication rate was significantly lower in period 2 (18.8%) compared with period 1 (23.8%) and period 3 (24.8%). Similarly, there was a significantly lower mortality rate in period 2 (1.6%) compared with period 1 (3.4%) and period 3 (4%). Conclusions: Slightly worse short-term outcomes in liver surgery were observed in recent years, with a concomitant increase of the aggressiveness of operative strategies. Nevertheless, the present results still justify an aggressive approach in liver resections.