Gordon Brestrich

Dr. Gordon Brestrich

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 June 2008 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMathias Streitz
Mathias Streitz
Michel NoutsiasMichel Noutsias
Michel Noutsias
RVRudolf Volkmer
Rudolf Volkmer
MRMaria Rohde
Maria Rohde
GBGordon Brestrich
Gordon Brestrich
FKFlorian Kern
Florian Kern
Parvovirus B19 (B19V) is the most commonly detected virus in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) from patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy (DCMi). Despite the importance of T-cells in antiviral defense, little is known about the role of B19V specific T-cells in this entity. An exceptionally high B19V viral load in EMBs (115,091 viral copies/μg nucleic acids), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and serum was measured in a DCMi patient at initial presentation, suggesting B19V viremia. The B19V viral load in EMBs had decreased substantially 6 and 12 months afterwards, and was not traceable in PBMCs and the serum at these times. Using pools of overlapping peptides spanning the whole B19V proteome, strong CD8+ T-cell responses were elicited to the 10-amico-acid peptides SALKLAIYKA (19.7% of all CD8+ cells) and QSALKLAIYK (10%) and additional weaker responses to GLCPHCINVG (0.71%) and LLHTDFEQVM (0.06%). Real-time RT-PCR of IFNγ secretion-assay-enriched T-cells responding to the peptides, SALKLAIYKA and GLCPHCINVG, revealed a disproportionately high T-cell receptor Vbeta (TRBV) 11 expression in this population. Furthermore, dominant expression of type-1 (IFNγ, IL2, IL27 and T-bet) and of cytotoxic T-cell markers (Perforin and Granzyme B) was found, whereas gene expression indicating type-2 (IL4, GATA3) and regulatory T-cells (FoxP3) was low. Our results indicate that B19V Ag-specific CD8+ T-cells with effector function are involved in B19V associated DCMi. In particular, a dominant role of TRBV11 and type-1/CTL effector cells in the T-cell mediated antiviral immune response is suggested. The persistence of B19V in the endomyocardium is a likely antigen source for the maintenance of CD8+ T-cell responses to the identified epitopes.

20 September 2024 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFrederick Angulo
Frederick Angulo
ECEmily Colby
Emily Colby
ALAnne-Mette Lebech
Anne-Mette Lebech
PLPer-Eric Lindgren
Per-Eric Lindgren
Anna Moniuszko-MalinowskaAnna Moniuszko-Malinowska
Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska
JSJames H. Stark
James H. Stark
To better understand the Lyme borreliosis (LB) burden in Europe, we aimed to estimate the incidence of symptomatic Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bbsl) infections after adjusting public health LB surveillance data for under-detection of symptomatic Bbsl infections. Data from seroprevalence studies and estimates of the symptomatic proportion and duration of antibody detection in Bbsl-infected individuals, derived from reviews of the published literature, were used to adjust public health LB surveillance data to estimate the incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection in nine European countries from 2018-2022. The prevalence of anti-Bbsl antibodies ranged from 2.3% in Romania to 9.4% in Germany. Under-detection multipliers varied across surveillance systems; using 10-year duration of antibody detection, multipliers were 2.4-10.5 in countries reporting all LB cases and 54.6-722.2 in countries reporting only Lyme neuroborreliosis cases. The incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection adjusted for under-detection was highest in Finland, Germany, Norway, Poland, and Switzerland, intermediate in the Czech Republic and Denmark, and lowest in Ireland and Romania. Adjustment of LB surveillance for under-detection found a high incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection in several European countries. Differences in LB surveillance systems should be considered when comparing surveillance data between countries and when estimating LB disease burden.

10 March 2023 in Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGordon Brestrich
Gordon Brestrich
FAFrederick J. Angulo
Frederick J. Angulo
FBFabian Berger
Fabian Berger
CBChristian Brösamle
Christian Brösamle
SHStefan Hagel
Stefan Hagel
AMAlexander Mellmann
Alexander Mellmann
Introduction Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a recognized global threat especially for vulnerable populations. It is of particular concern to healthcare providers as it is found in both hospital and community settings, with severe courses, frequent recurrence, high mortality and substantial financial impact on the healthcare system. The CDI burden in Germany has been described and compared by analysing data from four different public databases. Methods Data on hospital burden of CDI have been extracted, compared, and discussed from four public databases for the years 2010–2019. Hospital days due to CDI were compared to established vaccine preventable diseases, such as influenza and herpes zoster, and also to CDI hospitalisations in the United States (US). Results All four databases reported comparable incidences and trends. Beginning in 2010, population-based hospitalised CDI incidence increased to a peak of > 137/100,000 in 2013. Then, incidence declined to 81/100,000 in 2019. Hospitalised patients with CDI were predominantly > 50 years of age. The population-based incidence of severe CDI was between 1.4 and 8.4/100,000 per year. Recurrence rates were between 5.9 to 6.5%. More than 1,000 CDI deaths occurred each year, with a peak of 2,666 deaths in 2015. Cumulative CDI patient days (PD) were between 204,596 and 355,466 each year, which exceeded cumulated PD for influenza and herpes zoster in most years, though year-to-year differences were observed. Finally, hospitalized CDI incidence was higher in Germany than in the US, where the disease is well recognized as a public health threat. Conclusions All four public sources documented a decline in CDI cases since 2013, but the disease burden remains substantial and warrants continued attention as a severe public health challenge.

27 February 2024 in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GBGordon Brestrich
Gordon Brestrich
CHChristine Hagemann
Christine Hagemann
JDJoanna Diesing
Joanna Diesing
NKNils Kossack
Nils Kossack
JSJames H. Stark
James H. Stark
JSJochen Suess
Jochen Suess
Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease in Germany. Although the incidence of LB in Germany has been assessed in several studies, those studies either used data from statutory surveillance, which frequently underreport cases, or data from health claims databases, which may overestimate cases due to non-specific LB case definitions. Here, using a more specific case definition, we describe the incidence of medically-attended LB by disease manifestation, age group, and federal state for the period 2015-2019. Both inpatient and outpatient cases were analyzed from a claims database. To be eligible for inclusion, patients were required to have an LB specific ICD-10 GM diagnosis code plus an antibiotic prescription, and for disseminated manifestations, a laboratory test order additionally. LB cases were classified as erythema migrans (EM), or disseminated disease including Lyme arthritis (LA), Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB), and all other disease manifestations (OTH). Between 2015 and 2019, the incidence of medically-attended LB cases ranged from 195.7/100,000 population per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 191.0 - 200.5) to 254.5/100,000 population per year (95% CI, 249.0 - 260.0) per year. The majority of cases (92.2%) were EM, while 2.8% presented as LA, 3.8% as LNB, and 1.2% as OTH. For both EM and disseminated disease, the incidence peaked in children aged 5-9 years and in older adults. By federal state, the incidence of medically-attended EM ranged from 74.4/100,000 population per year (95% CI, 71.9 - 77.0) per year in Hamburg, to 394.1/100,000 population per year (95% CI, 370.7 - 417.6) per year in Saxony, whereas for medically-attended disseminated disease, the highest incidence was in Thuringia, Saxony, and Bavaria (range: 22.0 [95% CI, 19.9 - 24.0] to 35.7 [95% CI, 34.7 - 36.7] per 100,000 population per year). This study comprehensively estimated the incidence of all manifestations of medically-attended LB and showed a high incidence of LB throughout Germany. Results from the study support performing epidemiological studies in all federal states to measure the burden of LB and to invest in public health interventions for prevention.

17 April 2023 in Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JOJulia Olsen
Julia Olsen
FAF.J. Angulo
F.J. Angulo
APAndreas Pilz
Andreas Pilz
KHK. Halsby
K. Halsby
PKP. Kelly
P. Kelly
LJL. Jodar
L. Jodar
Although nine of 16 federal states in Germany conduct public health surveillance for Lyme borreliosis (LB), the extent of under-ascertainment is unknown. As a model for European countries that conduct LB surveillance, we sought to estimate the population-based incidence of symptomatic LB after adjusting for under-ascertainment. Estimating seroprevalence-derived under-ascertainment relies on data from seroprevalence studies, public health surveillance, and published literature. The number of symptomatic LB cases in states that conduct LB surveillance was estimated from studies reporting the seroprevalence of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, the proportion of LB cases that are asymptomatic, and the duration of antibody detection. The number of estimated incident symptomatic LB cases was compared with the number of surveillance-reported LB cases to derive under-ascertainment multipliers. The multipliers were applied to the number of 2021 surveillance-reported LB cases to estimate the population-based incidence of symptomatic LB in Germany. Adjusting for seroprevalence-based under-ascertainment multipliers, the estimated number of symptomatic LB cases in states that conducted surveillance was 129,870 (408 per 100,000 population) in 2021. As there were 11,051 surveillance-reported cases in 2021 in these states, these data indicate there were 12 symptomatic LB cases for every surveillance-reported LB case. We demonstrate that symptomatic LB is underdetected in Germany and that this seroprevalence-based approach can be applied elsewhere in Europe where requisite data are available. Nationwide expansion of LB surveillance would further elucidate the true LB disease burden in Germany and could support targeted disease prevention efforts to address the high LB disease burden.

13 February 2025 in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GBGordon Brestrich
Gordon Brestrich
MSMadiha Shafquat
Madiha Shafquat
FAFrederick Angulo
Frederick Angulo
ADAlexander Davidson
Alexander Davidson
KLKristian Lie
Kristian Lie
JSJames H. Stark
James H. Stark
Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease in Europe. Many European countries conduct LB surveillance, but these data do not always capture the complete burden on the healthcare system and are difficult to compare across countries due to unstandardized reporting procedures. In this study, we combined data from public health surveillance and published literature to estimate the incidence of patients with LB seeking healthcare by clinical manifestation in Norway, Finland, and Poland. Surveillance data in each country were combined with medical administrative datasets (e.g., public health registries, claims databases, electronic medical records) to estimate the incidence of medically-attended LB. These estimates were adjusted to exclude cases that were not prescribed LB-specific antibiotics, and remove cases present in multiple datasets. Country-specific distributions of clinical manifestations were used to obtain medically-attended incidence by clinical manifestation. We estimated a high incidence of medically-attended LB in Norway (213.2 / 100,000 population per year [PPY]), Finland (116.4 / 100,000 PPY), and Poland (130.9 / 100,000 PPY). This corresponds to 67,578 annual cases or 2.7 times more than reported by surveillance in these countries. Incidence of disseminated LB was also substantial with 9.9, 36.3 and 6.2/ 100,000 PPY in Norway, Finland and Poland respectively corresponding to a total of 4,920 annual cases. This study provides estimates for incidence of medically-attended LB, including disseminated LB, in three European countries and highlights the limitations of surveillance data alone in assessing LB burden.