Background: Coronary heart disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Psychosocial factors such as depression and low social support are established risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with heart disease. However, little is known about the hypothetical relationship pattern between them. Purpose: The purposes of this narrative review are (1) to appraise the 2002–2012 empirical evidence about the multivariate relationship between depression, social support and health outcomes in patients with heart disease; (2) to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. Method: PubMed and PsychINFO were searched for quantitative studies assessing the multiple effects of low social support and depression on prognosis outcomes in patients with heart disease. The following search terms were used: social relation*, cardiac disease, support quality, relationship, and relational support. Results: Five studies (three prospective cohort studies, one case-control study, and one randomization controlled trial) were selected and coded according to the types of support (social and marital). The majority of findings suggests that low social support/being unmarried and depression are independent risk factors for poor cardiac prognosis. However, all analyzed studies have some limitations. The majority of them did not focus on the quality of marital or social relationships, but assessed only the presence of marital status or social relationship. Moreover, some of them present methodological limitations. Conclusion: Depressive symptoms and the absence of social or marital support are significant risk factors for poor prognosis in cardiac patients and some evidence supports their independence in predicting adverse outcomes. Cardiac rehabilitation and prevention programs should thus include not only the assessment and treatment of depression but also a specific component on the family and social contexts of patients.

: OBJECTIVES: Commissural orientation <160° is a recognized risk factor for bicuspid aortic valve repair failure. Based on this observation, repairing this subtype of aortic valve by reorienting the 2 commissures at 180° has recently been proposed. METHODS: Nine porcine hearts with aortic annulus diameters of 25 mm were selected. A pathological model of a Sievers 1 bicuspid aortic valve was obtained by suturing the coaptation line between the left and right leaflets. Each heart underwent reimplantation procedures both in the native (120°) and the reoriented (180°) configuration. After the operation, each sample was tested on a pulse duplicator at rest (heart rate 60 beats per min) and with mild exercise (heart rate 90 beats per min) conditions. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was noted in mean and peak transvalvular aortic gradients between the 2 configurations at rest (18.6 ± 5 vs 17.5 ± 4 for the mean aortic gradient; 42.8 ± 12.7 vs 36.3 ± 5.8 for the peak aortic gradient) but the group with the 120°-oriented commissures had significantly higher mean transaortic gradients compared to the group with the 180°-oriented commissures at initial exercise stress conditions (30.1 ± 9.1 vs 24.9 ± 3.8; p value 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The 180° commissural reorientation of the asymmetrical bicuspid aortic valve does not improve the transvalvular aortic gradient in an acute model at rest conditions, but it could do so under stress situations. Even if it is surgically more complex and time-consuming, this approach could be a good strategy to improve long-term results, particularly in young patients.

Primary isolated aortic regurgitation (AR) is defined as aortic valve (AV) incompetence in the absence of significant dilation of the aortic root and ascending aorta (AscAo), with diameters <40 mm. According to ESC/EACTS valve guidelines, surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients with severe AR, and selected asymptomatic patients with high-risk features, including left ventricular dysfunction. ¹ Concomitant replacement of the aortic root or ascending aorta should be considered when the diameter exceeds 45 mm, considering factors such as age, body surface area, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and intraoperative findings. ¹ However, data specifically addressing patients with AR and intermediate aortic dimensions (<45 mm) remain limited, especially with regard to potential growth of the aortic root and ascending aorta. ^2–4 To evaluate the suitability of isolated Aortic Valve repair (AVr) for primary AR in the context of possible future aortic enlargement. Data were obtained from Heart Valve Society (HVS) Aortic-Valve-Database (recruitment period 1998-2024). Definitions and outcomes are available on the HVS website (https://www.hvs.com). Each participating center obtained local ethical approval to collect and share data with the HVS AV database (Erasmus MC: MEC-2020–0890).