Julius Pochhammer

Dr. Julius Pochhammer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 December 2017 in International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJulius Pochhammer
Julius Pochhammer
FTFridolin Tröster
Fridolin Tröster
GBGunnar Blumenstock
Gunnar Blumenstock
JCJulienne Closset
Julienne Closset
SLStefanie Lang
Stefanie Lang
MSMichael Schäffer
Michael Schäffer

7 November 2018 in Hernia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJulius Pochhammer
Julius Pochhammer
BSB. Scholtes
B. Scholtes
JKJ. Keuler
J. Keuler
BMB. Müssle
B. Müssle
TWT. Welsch
T. Welsch
MSM. Schäffer
M. Schäffer

12 July 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPernilla Conrad
Pernilla Conrad
AMAnne-Sophie Mehdorn
Anne-Sophie Mehdorn
IAIbrahim Alkatout
Ibrahim Alkatout
TBThomas Becker
Thomas Becker
JBJan Henrik Beckmann
Jan Henrik Beckmann
JPJulius Pochhammer
Julius Pochhammer
Introduction: For over two decades, abdominal surgical procedures have been safely performed robotically. After the first patent expiration, alternative robotic systems entered the market. The Dexter Robotic System™ is a small-format, modular, and robotic platform consisting of a surgeon’s console, two patient carts with instrument arms, and one endoscope arm. We report our initial experiences with Dexter since its installation at our visceral surgery department. Methods: The system and surgical setup are described. Demographic and perioperative data of all operated patients as well as the system docking times were analyzed. Results: From 56 procedures performed with Dexter, the most common ones included cholecystectomy (n = 15), inguinal hernia repair (TAPP; unilateral n = 15; bilateral n = 3), and right oncologic hemicolectomy (n = 15). The median docking time was 6 min (2–16 min) and was reduced to 4 min in the last tertile of procedures performed. Conclusions: In our experience, Dexter can be implemented without any major challenges, and visceral surgical procedures of simple to medium complexity can be performed safely. The simplicity and accessibility of the system along with the ease of switching between robotics and laparoscopy could be particularly suitable for beginners in robotic surgery

30 August 2014 in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJulius Pochhammer
Julius Pochhammer
SZSteffi Zacheja
Steffi Zacheja
MSMichael Schäffer
Michael Schäffer

26 September 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFlorian Richter
Florian Richter
AMAnne-Sophie Mehdorn
Anne-Sophie Mehdorn
TFThorben Fedders
Thorben Fedders
BRBenedikt Reichert
Benedikt Reichert
JEJan-Hendrik Egberts
Jan-Hendrik Egberts
JPJulius Pochhammer
Julius Pochhammer
Introduction: The value of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy has been addressed by numerous studies. Despite its increasing application, robotic esophagectomy (RAMIE) has not been considered separately yet in this context. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the predictive value of CRP in RAMIE. Material and Methods: Patients undergoing RAMIE or completely open esophagectomy (OE) at our University Center were included. Clinical data, CRP- and Procalcitonin (PCT)-values were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database and evaluated for their predictive value for subsequent postoperative infectious complications (PIC) (AL, gastric conduit leakage or necrosis, pneumonia, empyema). Results: Three hundred and five patients (RAMIE: 160, OE: 145) were analyzed. PIC were noted in 91 patients on postoperative day (POD) 10 and 123 patients on POD 30, respectively. Median POD of diagnosis of PIC was POD 8. Post-operative CRP-values in the robotic-group peaked one and two days later, respectively, and converged from POD 5 onward compared to the open-group. In the group with PIC, CRP-levels in the robotic-group were initially lower and started to differ significantly from POD 3 onward. In the open-group, increases were already noticed from POD 3 on. Procalcitonin levels did not differ. Best Receiver operating curve (ROC)-results were on POD 4, highest negative predictive values at POD 5 (RAMIE) and POD 4 (OE) with cut-off values of 70 mg/L and 88.3 mg/L, respectively. Conclusion: Post-operative CRP is a good negative predictor for PIC, after both RAMIE and OE. After RAMIE, CRP peaks later with a lower cut-off value.

23 February 2017 in Der Chirurg
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJulius Pochhammer
Julius Pochhammer
AKA. Kramer
A. Kramer
MSM. Schäffer
M. Schäffer