Louisa Ells

Dr. Louisa Ells

Reader in Public Health and Obesity, Specialist Advisor in Public Health England, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 June 2017 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEmma Mead
Emma Mead
Tamara BrownTamara Brown
Tamara Brown
KRKaren Rees
Karen Rees
LALiane Azevedo
Liane Azevedo
VWVictoria Whittaker
Victoria Whittaker
LELouisa Ells
Louisa Ells

9 October 2018 in International Journal of Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LELouisa Ells
Louisa Ells
KRKaren Rees
Karen Rees
Tamara BrownTamara Brown
Tamara Brown
EMEmma Mead
Emma Mead
LALena Al-Khudairy
Lena Al-Khudairy
ADAlessandro Demaio
Alessandro Demaio
Children and adolescents with overweight and obesity are a global health concern. This is an integrative overview of six Cochrane systematic reviews, providing an up-to-date synthesis of the evidence examining interventions for the treatment of children and adolescents with overweight or obesity. The data extraction and quality assessments for each review were conducted by one author and checked by a second. The six high quality reviews provide evidence on the effectiveness of behaviour changing interventions conducted in children <6 years (7 trials), 6–11 years (70 trials), adolescents 12–17 years (44 trials) and interventions that target only parents of children aged 5–11 years (20 trials); in addition to interventions examining surgery (1 trial) and drugs (21 trials). Most of the evidence was derived from high-income countries and published in the last two decades. Collectively, the evidence suggests that multi-component behaviour changing interventions may be beneficial in achieving small reductions in body weight status in children of all ages, with low adverse event occurrence were reported. More research is required to understand which specific intervention components are most effective and in whom, and how best to maintain intervention effects. Evidence from surgical and drug interventions was too limited to make inferences about use and safety, and adverse events were a serious consideration.

15 December 2022 in Obesity Facts
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMaria Hassapidou
Maria Hassapidou
AVAntonis Vlassopoulos
Antonis Vlassopoulos
MKMarianna Kalliostra
Marianna Kalliostra
EGElisabeth Govers
Elisabeth Govers
HMHilda Mulrooney
Hilda Mulrooney
Tamara BrownTamara Brown
Tamara Brown
Introduction: Obesity affects nearly 1 in 4 European adults increasing their risk for mortality and physical and psychological morbidity. Obesity is a chronic relapsing disease characterized by abnormal or excessive adiposity with risks to health. Medical nutrition therapy based on the latest scientific evidence should be offered to all Europeans living with obesity as part of obesity treatment interventions. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify the latest evidence published in the November 2018–March 2021 period and to synthesize them in the European guidelines for medical nutrition therapy in adult obesity. Results: Medical nutrition therapy should be administered by trained dietitians as part of a multidisciplinary team and should aim to achieve positive health outcomes, not solely weight changes. A diverse range of nutrition interventions are shown to be effective in the treatment of obesity and its comorbidities, and dietitians should consider all options and deliver personalized interventions. Although caloric restriction-based interventions are effective in promoting weight reduction, long-term adherence to behavioural changes may be better supported via alternative interventions based on eating patterns, food quality, and mindfulness. The Mediterranean diet, vegetarian diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, portfolio diet, Nordic, and low-carbohydrate diets have all been associated with improvement in metabolic health with or without changes in body weight. In the November 2018–March 2021 period, the latest evidence published focused around intermittent fasting and meal replacements as obesity treatment options. Although the role of meal replacements is further strengthened by the new evidence, for intermittent fasting no evidence of significant advantage over and above continuous energy restriction was found. Pulses, fruit and vegetables, nuts, whole grains, and dairy foods are also important elements in the medical nutrition therapy of adult obesity. Discussion: Any nutrition intervention should be based on a detailed nutritional assessment including an assessment of personal values, preferences, and social determinants of eating habits. Dietitians are expected to design interventions that are flexible and person centred. Approaches that avoid caloric restriction or detailed eating plans (non-dieting approaches) are also recommended for improvement of quality of life and body image perceptions.

18 July 2006 in Obesity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LELouisa Ells
Louisa Ells
RLR. Lang
R. Lang
JHJulian Hamilton-Shield
Julian Hamilton-Shield
JWJ. R. Wilkinson
J. R. Wilkinson
JLJ. S. M. Lidstone
J. S. M. Lidstone
CSC. D. Summerbell
C. D. Summerbell

1 December 2005 in British Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LELouisa Ells
Louisa Ells
CSChris Seal
Chris Seal
BKBernd Kettlitz
Bernd Kettlitz
WBWendy Bal
Wendy Bal
JMJohn Mathers
John Mathers
The objective of the present study was to investigate the postprandial metabolism of two starches with contrasting rates of hydrolysis in vitro. Characterized using the Englyst method of in vitro starch classification, C*Set 06 598 contained predominantly rapidly digestible starch and C*Gel 04 201 contained predominantly slowly digestible starch. Each test starch, naturally enriched with 13C, was fed to ten healthy female volunteers as part of a moderate fat test meal (containing 75 g test starch and 21 g fat), in a double-blind randomized crossover design. The metabolic response to each starch was measured after an overnight fast, in an acute 6 h study, before and after 14 d of daily consumption of 75 g test starch. During each acute study, blood samples were taken at 15 min intervals for the first 2 h and at 30 min intervals for the remaining 4 h. Breath 13CO2 enrichment was measured at the same time points and indirect calorimetry was performed for 20 min every 40 min immediately before and throughout the study. Significantly more rapid, greater changes in postprandial plasma glucose, NEFA and serum insulin concentrations were observed after consumption of the rapidly digestible starch. Breath 13CO2 output over the first 3–4 h rose rapidly then began to decline following consumption of the rapidly digestible starch, but plateaued for the slowly digestible starch. The 14 d adaptation period did not affect any of the glycaemic or lipaemic variables but there was a reduction in postprandial plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 concentrations. These data confirm that starches characterized as predominantly rapidly digestible versus slowly digestible by the Englyst procedure provoke distinctly different patterns of metabolism postprandially.

7 November 2021 in Obesity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALiane Azevedo
Liane Azevedo
JSJohn Stephenson
John Stephenson
LELouisa Ells
Louisa Ells
SAShirley Adu‐Ntiamoah
Shirley Adu‐Ntiamoah
ADAnn DeSmet  
Ann DeSmet  
MHMichelle Hudson
Michelle Hudson