The currently recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection achieves only viral suppression whilst on therapy, but rarely hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss. The ultimate therapeutic endpoint is the combination of HBsAg loss, inhibition of new hepatocyte infection, elimination of the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) pool, and restoration of immune function in order to achieve virus control. This review concentrates on new antiviral drugs that target different stages of the HBV life cycle (direct acting antivirals) and others that enhance both innate and adaptive immunity against HBV (immunotherapy). Drugs that block HBV hepatocyte entry, compounds that silence or deplete the cccDNA pool, others that affect core assembly, agents that degrade RNase-H, interfering RNA molecules, and nucleic acid polymers are likely interventions in the viral life cycle. In the immunotherapy category, molecules that activate the innate immune response such as Toll-like-receptors, Retinoic acid Inducible Gene-1 (RIG-1) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists or checkpoint inhibitors, and modulation of the adaptive immunity by therapeutic vaccines, vector-based vaccines, or adoptive transfer of genetically-engineered T cells aim towards the restoration of T cell function. Future therapeutic trends would likely be a combination of one or more of the aforementioned drugs that target the viral life cycle and at least one immunomodulator.

Background/Aims: Myosteatosis implies impaired muscle quality. The aim of the study was to investigate the association of myosteatosis with other muscle abnormalities and its role in the prognosis of liver cirrhosis (LC). Method: Skeletal muscle index (SMI) and myosteatosis were measured by computed tomography. Myosteatosis was defined as muscle radiodensity and evaluated according to dry body mass index (BMI). Median values and interquartile range were used for continuous and count (percentage) for categorical variables. Results: A total of 197 consecutive patients were included (age 61 (IQR 52–68); 67% male; MELD score 11 (interquartile range 7.5–16)). Myosteatosis was identified in 73.6% and sarcopenia in 44.6% of patients. Myosteatosis was positively associated with age (p = 0.024) and Child–Pugh (p = 0.017) and inversely associated with SMI (p = 0.026). Patients with myosteatosis exhibited lower 360-day survival (log-rank p = 0.001) compared to those without it. MELD (p < 0.001) and myosteatosis (p = 0.048) emerged as negative prognostic factors of survival in multivariate model. Individuals combining low muscle strength and impaired muscle quality and quantity displayed more advanced LC, impaired muscle performance, lower BMI (p < 0.001 each) and a three times higher mortality rate compared to those with low muscle quality alone. Conclusions: The presence of myosteatosis was associated with advanced age, low skeletal mass and more severe LC. Myosteatosis was associated with poor prognosis and may represent a prodromal phase of muscle degeneration before the development of sarcopenia.

Background: Physical frailty (PF) is a syndrome of decreased physical function and reserves, preventing patients from coping with stressful events. PF screening tools in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) can help evaluate the risk of complications and death. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of five screening tools in detecting PF and their ability to predict 18-month mortality in LC. Methods: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried frailty phenotype (FFP), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) were compared with the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) as the method of reference. Patients with an LFI ≥ 4.5, SPPB ≤ 8, FFP ≥ 3, CFS ≥ 6 points, and those walking <250 m, were considered frail. Results: A total of 109 consecutive patients with stable LC were included [63.3% male, median age 62 years, (IQR 52–70), MELD 9 (7–14.5), 46.8% with decompensated LC (DC)]. PF was present in 23.9%, 27.5%, 41.3%, 13.8%, and 28.4% as assessed by the LFI, SPPB, FFP, CFS, and 6MWT, respectively. Cohen’s kappa measurement of agreement of four of the tools with LFI was 0.568, 0.334, 0.439, and 0.502, respectively (p < 0.001 for each). Kaplan–Meier survival curves at 18 months showed higher mortality in frail patients compared to non-frail patients by any method (log rank p < 0.05). In the multivariate models, PF defined by any method emerged as an independent prognostic factor of 18-month mortality after adjustment for age, gender, and MELD-score. Conclusions: Patients characterized as frail by five screening tools were not identical. However, PF defined by either method was proven to be an independent poor prognostic factor for long-term mortality after adjustment for covariates.