Bone is the most frequent site of metastases of prostate cancer and is almost always the first and frequently the only site of metastases where disease will progress to stage D3. In addition, the number of skeletal metastatic foci is the most powerful independent prognostic factor of limited response to hormone ablation therapy and poor survival of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Furthermore, disease progression frequently occurs in the osteoblastic metastases, even though androgen ablation therapy still provides adequate and sustained control of disease at the primary site. Notably, the management of metastatic disease onto bones has traditionally relied on therapeutic modalities, which almost exclusively aim at directly inducing cancer cell death. However, accumulating pieces of evidence, from both the clinical and the basic research front, point to major limitations of this conventional approach. The in vivo response of malignant cells to anticancer therapies is directly influenced by the local microenvironment in which they metastasize. In particular, organ sites frequently involved in metastatic diseases, such as the bones, appear to confer to metastatic cells protection from anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. This protection is mediated by soluble growth factors and cytokines released by the normal cellular constituents of the host tissue microenvironment. The characterization of bone microenvironment-related survival factors has led to the development of a novel hormone manipulation which can re-introduce clinical responses in patients with stage D3 prostate cancer.

Aims: Levosimendan (LEVO) a clinically-used inodilator, exerts multifaceted cardioprotective effects. Case-studies indicate protection against doxorubicin (DXR)-induced cardiotoxicity, but this effect remains obscure. We investigated the effect and mechanism of different regimens of levosimendan on sub-chronic and chronic doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Methods and results: Based on preliminary in vivo experiments, rats serving as a sub-chronic model of doxorubicin-cardiotoxicity and were divided into: Control (N/S-0.9%), DXR (18 mg/kg-cumulative), DXR+LEVO (LEVO, 24 μg/kg-cumulative), and DXR+LEVO (acute) (LEVO, 24 μg/kg-bolus) for 14 days. Protein kinase-B (Akt), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and protein kinase-A and G (PKA/PKG) pathways emerged as contributors to the cardioprotection, converging onto phospholamban (PLN). To verify the contribution of PLN, phospholamban knockout (PLN−/−) mice were assigned to PLN−/−/Control (N/S-0.9%), PLN−/−/DXR (18 mg/kg), and PLN−/−/DXR+LEVO (ac) for 14 days. Furthermore, female breast cancer-bearing (BC) mice were divided into: Control (normal saline 0.9%, N/S 0.9%), DXR (18 mg/kg), LEVO, and DXR+LEVO (LEVO, 24 μg/kg-bolus) for 28 days. Echocardiography was performed in all protocols. To elucidate levosimendan’s cardioprotective mechanism, primary cardiomyocytes were treated with doxorubicin or/and levosimendan and with N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), DT-2, and H-89 (eNOS, PKG, and PKA inhibitors, respectively); cardiomyocyte-toxicity was assessed. Single bolus administration of levosimendan abrogated DXR-induced cardiotoxicity and activated Akt/eNOS and cAMP-PKA/cGMP-PKG/PLN pathways but failed to exert cardioprotection in PLN−/− mice. Levosimendan’s cardioprotection was also evident in the BC model. Finally, in vitro PKA inhibition abrogated levosimendan-mediated cardioprotection, indicating that its cardioprotection is cAMP-PKA dependent, while levosimendan preponderated over milrinone and dobutamine, by ameliorating calcium overload. Conclusion: Single dose levosimendan prevented doxorubicin cardiotoxicity through a cAMP-PKA-PLN pathway, highlighting the role of inotropy in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity.

Beta-glucan rich mushrooms may exert beneficial in vitro effects on bone physiology by alterations in the gut microbiota and/or SCFAs.