Precipitation is a fundamental component of the Earth’s hydrological cycle. Therefore, monitoring precipitation is paramount, as accurate information is needed to prevent natural hydrological disasters, such as floods and droughts. However, measuring precipitation using rain gauges is complicated due to their sparse spatial distribution. Satellite precipitation products (SPPs) are an alternative source of rainfall data. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PERSIANN-CCS and PDIR-Now SPPs over the Tulijá River Basin (Chiapas, Mexico) using scatter plots, categorical statistics, descriptive statistics, and decomposing total bias. Additionally, bias correction was performed using the quantile mapping (QM) method. QM is a technique used to improve the fit of SPPs with respect to rainfall observations through a transfer function, aiming to reduce systematic errors in SPPs. The results indicate that the PDIR-Now product tends to overestimate rainfall to a large extent, thus showing better performance in detecting rain events. Meanwhile, PERSIANN-CCS underestimates precipitation to a lesser extent. The findings of this study demonstrate that correcting the bias of SPPs improves estimations of rainfall records, thereby reducing the percentage bias and root mean square error.

The use of remote sensing data in hydrological applications has increased, especially in regions with limited ground-based observations. Satellite precipitation products (SPPs) provide extensive temporal and spatial coverage but may contain biases that can affect their performance in hydrological simulations. This study evaluates the performance of four near-real-time SPPs for daily streamflow modeling in the Tulijá River Basin (TRB), Mexico: Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN)-Cloud Classification System (CCS), PERSIANN-Dynamic Infrared Rain Rate near real-time (PDIR-Now), and the Early Run and Late Run products of the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) (IMERG). The SPPs were first compared with meteorological station precipitation data and subsequently bias-corrected using the Linear Scaling (LS) method. The CEQUEAU hydrological model simulated streamflow using three precipitation datasets: meteorological stations, original SPPs, and bias-corrected SPPs. For simulations using observed precipitation, the model was calibrated for 1991–2014 and validated for 1968–1990; for SPP-based simulations, calibration and validation were performed for 2003–2011 and 2012–2014, respectively. Model performance was assessed using the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R²). The results show that CEQUEAU performance varies by precipitation dataset. Simulations using observed precipitation yielded NSE values close to 0.70 during both calibration and validation, whereas the original SPPs yielded NSE values below 0.18, including negative values. After bias correction, IMERG-Early and IMERG-Late yielded NSE values of approximately 0.55 during both periods. These findings highlight the importance of analyzing the performance of near-real-time SPPs in hydrological applications, especially in tropical regions with complex topography.