Background: Recently several calcium silicate flowable sealers have been introduced as endodontic materials for the root canal. This clinical study tested the use of a new premixed calcium silicate bioceramic sealer in association with the Thermafil warm carrier-based technique (TF). Epoxy-resin-based sealer with the warm carrier-based technique was the control group. Methodology: Healthy consecutive patients (n = 85) requiring 94 root canal treatments were enrolled in this study and assigned to one filling group (Ceraseal-TF n = 47, AH Plus-TF n = 47) in accordance with operator training and best clinical practice. Periapical X-rays were taken preoperatively, after root canal filling and after 6, 12 and 24 months. Two evaluators blindly assessed the periapical index (PAI) and sealer extrusion in the groups (k = 0.90). Healing rate and survival rate were also evaluated. Chi-square tests was used to analyze significant differences between the groups. Multilevel analysis was performed to evaluate the factors associated with healing status. Results: A total of 89 root canal treatments in 82 patients were analyzed at the end-line (24 months). The total drop-out was 3.6% (3 patients; 5 teeth). A total of 91.1% of healed teeth (PAI 1-2) was observed in Ceraseal-TF, with 88.6% in AH Plus-TF. No significant difference was observed on healing outcome and survival among the two filling groups (p > 0.05). Apical extrusion of the sealers occurred in 17 cases (19.0%). Of these, 6 occurred in Ceraseal-TF (13.3%) and 11 in AH Plus-TF (25.0%). Three Ceraseal extrusions were radiographically undetectable after 24 months. All the AH Plus extrusions did not change during the evaluation time. Conclusions: The combined use of the carrier-based technique and premixed CaSi-based bioceramic sealer showed clinical results comparable with carrier-based technique and epoxy-resin-based sealer. The radiographical disappearance of apically extruded Ceraseal is a possible event in the first 24 months.

The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate specific mechanical and physicochemical properties of three calcium silicate-based sealers, BioRoot™ Flow (BRF), CeraSeal (CRS) and TotalFill^® (TF). Samples were prepared to evaluate different physicochemical and mechanical properties of the tested sealers. These evaluations were accomplished by investigating the pH changes over time, porosity, roughness, flow properties, compressive strength and wettability. The results were statistically evaluated using one-way analysis of variance. All three sealers demonstrated an alkaline pH from 1 h of immersion in water to 168 h. A higher porosity and hydrophily were detected in BRF samples compared to CRS and TF. No significant difference was found between the tested materials in the flow properties. Lower compressive strength values were observed for BRF compared to TF and CRS. Differently shaped structures were detected on the three materials after 7 days of immersion in PBS. The three materials demonstrated a higher solubility than 3% after 24 h of immersion in water (CRS < BRF < TF). The novel premixed calcium silicate sealer (BRF) had comparable physicochemical properties to the existing sealers. The lower compressive strength values could facilitate the removal of these materials during retreatment procedures. Further studies should investigate the biological effects of the novel sealer.

Hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs) are increasingly used in endodontics, but evidence on their long-term clinical effectiveness remains limited. This retrospective study evaluated the 5-year outcomes of primary root canal treatments and retreatments performed with a CSBS in teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis. The sample consisted of 637 teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis treated by a single experienced operator using a premixed CSBS (CeraSeal; Meta Biomed Co., Cheongju, South Korea) with the cold hydraulic condensation technique (CHC). Data were retrospectively collected from clinical charts and radiographic archives. Preoperative variables included sex, systemic health, tooth type, arch location, lesion size, pulpal diagnosis, sinus tract, and preoperative small perforation. Intraoperative factors comprised intracanal medication, apical diameter, obturation length, and sealer extrusion. Postoperative information included the type of coronal restoration. Follow-up evaluations were based on available radiographs and clinical notes at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Outcomes were classified according to strict criteria (absence of symptoms and complete radiographic resolution) and loose criteria (absence of symptoms with complete or partial healing). Prognostic factors were investigated using bivariate associations and multivariate logistic regression models. Strict success rates increased progressively (80.2% at 1 year, 85.7% at 2 years, 86.8% at 3 years, 88.2% at 4 years, and 87.67% at 5 years). Loose success remained consistently high (99.2% at 1 year; 90.7% at 4 years, and 87.67% at 5 years). Higher baseline periapical index (PAI) scores significantly reduced odds of strict success at 2, 3, 4 years. Other factors, including age, sex, tooth type, treatment type, extrusion, and restoration, were not significant. CSBSs demonstrated favorable long-term outcomes. Preoperative lesion severity was the main prognostic factor, while demographic and procedural variables showed limited influence on long-term success. This study supports the long-term clinical reliability of CSBSs used with CHC in teeth with apical periodontitis. Preoperative lesion severity remains the primary prognostic factor influencing periapical healing over time.

Calcium silicate‐based and glass ionomer cements are often used in caries‐affected dentine. This study investigated the remineralising and physicochemical properties of two calcium silicates and a glass ionomer cement. Human molars with Class I cavities were subjected to pH cycling to simulate caries lesions. These were restored using two different calcium silicate cements (CTR–MTA or MTA‐VOCO) or a glass ionomer cement (GIC). After storage in artificial saliva, Knoop microhardness (KHN) was measured within a 300‐µm zone from the interface. Solubility, pH, calcium ion release, scanning electron microscopy (SEM)–energy‐dispersive x‐ray (EDX) and Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses were also conducted. Data were statistically analysed with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Both MTAs promoted greater remineralisation (KHN) compared to GIC. GIC showed the lowest solubility, whereas CTR–MTA demonstrated the highest solubility, followed by MTA‐VOCO; the latter had the highest calcium release. Apatite deposition was observed only in the MTA groups (SEM–EDX and FTIR). MTA‐VOCO demonstrated superior calcium ion release and increased dentine microhardness, although some signs of collagen degradation were also visible. Clinical relevance: GIC and calcium silicate cements may enhance mineral deposition in caries‐affected dentine, though the alkalinity of MTAs might compromise collagen integrity at the bonding interface.