OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the conventional frozen elephant trunk implantation technique with a modified implantation technique with an aortic anastomosis in zone 1 and extra-anatomic revascularization of the left subclavian artery during reperfusion. METHODS: Between May 2014 and March 2018, 40 patients (26 male; mean age 60.2 ± 11.2 years) underwent complete aortic arch replacement with the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis™ (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Scotland) at our institution. Seventeen patients underwent conventional arch replacement (group 1) and 23 patients the modified procedure (group 2). Indication for arch replacement included all types of acute and chronic diseases. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (213.1 ± 53.5 vs 243.8 ± 67.0 min, P = 0.13) and aortic cross-clamp time (114.4 ± 40.7 vs 117.3 ± 56.6 min, P = 0.86) did not differ significantly between group 1 and 2. There was a trend towards a shorter circulatory arrest time (50.72 ± 9.6 vs 44.7 ± 15.5 min; P = 0.20) in group 2. Perioperative mortality was 10% (5.9% vs 13%; P = 0.62). Stroke occurred in 10% (5.9% vs 13%; P = 0.62) of patients. Spinal cord injury occurred in 7.5% of patients (11.8% vs 4.3% P = 0.57). Due to the a proximal aortic anastomosis, there was a significantly shorter coverage of the descending aorta with the prosthesis ending at vertebral level Th7.5 (6.75–8) in group 1 versus Th6.0 (5.0–6.0) in group 2 (P-value = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the frozen elephant trunk prosthesis in zone 1 allows for a more proximal aortic anastomosis that could make the procedure more feasible especially in patients with difficult anatomies or in an acute setting.

Background: Psychological factors like anxiety and depression are recognised to play a causal role in the development of cardiovascular disease and they may also influence outcome after vascular surgery procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of anxiety and depression with postoperative outcome following elective carotid surgery. Methods: Single centre prospective observational study of patients treated for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis at an academic vascular surgery centre. Preoperative anxiety and depression were evaluated using self-reporting questionnaires: Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S/-T) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A/-D). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were assessed with the primary composite endpoint of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and death. Standard reporting guidelines for carotid disease were applied. Results: From June 2012 to November 2015, 393 carotid endarterectomies (CEA) were performed at our institution. Out of those, 98 asymptomatic patients were available for analysis (78% male; median age, 71.1 years). Median scores of self-reporting questionnaires did not differ from published data of the general population (STAI-T, trait component, median, 36; IQR, 31-42.75; STAI-S, state component, median, 38; IQR, 32-43; HADS-A median, 6; IQR, 3-8; HADS-D median, 4; IQR, 2-7). Cardiovascular risk factors were similar in anxious and non-anxious patients. The composite endpoint of stroke, MI and death occurred significantly more often in patients presenting with a preoperative HADS-A score higher than 6 (10.5%, 95% CI, 3-25; p =.020). Conclusions: The present study indicates that preoperative anxiety is associated with the occurrence of intra- and postoperative neurological events in patients undergoing CEA. Patients who had a preoperative HADS-A score of 6 or less had a very low probability of experiencing these complications.

Objectives: Risk stratification in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains challenging despite existing models. The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), originally developed for hematological conditions, has shown promise in various medical fields as a predictor of adverse outcomes. EASIX, calculated from lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and platelet count, reflects endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation. This study investigates EASIX’s potential in predicting mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing CABG. Methods: A total of 475 patients undergoing isolated CABG between January 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. EASIX scores were calculated from pre-operative blood samples. Patients were stratified based on an EASIX cut-off value of 1.16. Results: Patients with EASIX ≥ 1.16 were older and had more comorbidities. They experienced higher 30-day mortality (5.0% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.004), increased wound infections (6.7% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.035), and more frequent prolonged ventilation (9.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.040). The long-term survival analysis showed significant differences at 3 years (p = 0.030) and 5 years (p < 0.001). EASIX demonstrated moderate discriminatory power for long-term survival (AUROC 0.669, 95% CI: 0.598–0.740, p < 0.001). Importantly, the multivariable analysis revealed EASIX as an independent risk factor for long-term mortality, even after adjusting for traditional risk factors and comorbidities (HR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.59–4.42, p < 0.001). Conclusions: EASIX ≥ 1.16 was associated with postoperative morbidity and poorer long-term survival in patients undergoing CABG. This easily calculable score could enhance risk stratification and guide personalized postoperative management.

: OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of concomitant ascending aortic replacement on operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our institutional database for all patients undergoing elective isolated AVR and AVR with concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta between January 2009 and May 2020. Patients undergoing surgery for infective endocarditis or requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest were excluded. A 3:1 propensity matching was performed for 688 patients to compare isolated AVR (120 patients) with AVR + ascending aortic replacement (40 patients). RESULTS: There were significant differences in median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time [92.5 (75–114) vs 118.5 (104–131) min; P < 0.001], median aortic cross-clamp time [65.0 (51.5–78.5) vs 84.5 (77–94) min; P < 0.001] and median intensive care unit stay [1 (1–3) vs 2 (1–6) days; P < 0.01]. There was no significant difference in the use of intraoperative and postoperative blood products, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative atrial fibrillation, acute renal failure, incidence of stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta significantly prolongs CPB and aortic clamp times but does not increase operative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, replacement of a dilated ascending aorta appears to be the most durable and safest treatment option in patients undergoing AVR with an aneurysmatic ascending aorta.

The aim of the study was to investigate the potential prognostic role of preoperative measurement of erector spinae myosteatosis with Hounsfield Unit Average Calculation (HUAC) as a marker for sarcopenia and frailty in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery (CABG). Preoperative computer tomography (CT) derived measurements of 479 consecutive patients undergoing CABG between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively performed. The erector spinae muscle at the level of the 12^th vertebra was manually outlined bilaterally on the axial CT slices and Hounsfield Unit Average Calculation (HUAC) was performed. The lower quartile of muscle density values was defined as myosteatotic and thus sarcopenic. Sarcopenic (n = 121) versus non-sarcopenic patients (n = 358) were compared regarding postoperative morbidity, short-term and long-term mortality. Results were adjusted for age, Body Mass Index (BMI), atrial fibrillation and hypertension using inverse probability weighting (IPW) Sarcopenia was associated with higher 30-day mortality (4.1% vs 0.8% p = 0.012), mid-term mortality after 1 year (9.3% vs 3.1% p = 0.047) and 2 years (10.8% vs 4.2% p = 0.047). Long-term mortality (5 years) was 20.8% for sarcopenic and 13.0% for non-sarcopenic patients but was not found to be significantly different (p = 0.089). Sarcopenia was associated with higher rates of reintubation (7.5% vs 1.1% p < 0.001), sternal wound infections (7.5% vs 2.8% p = 0.039) and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis (2.5% vs 0.4% p = 0.021). In patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, sarcopenia was associated with increased short-term mortality, mid-term mortality and morbidity. The measurement of erector spinae myosteatosis could be an easy and useful parameter in preoperative risk assessment.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients suffering from chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and tissue loss treated with primary isolated femoral bifurcation endarterectomy (FBE) or with FBE combined with bypass surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed in a tertiary university-based care centre. Between January 2008 and December 2019, a prospectively collected database of patients suffering from CLTI and tissue loss and undergoing either primary FBE (group A) or FBE in combination with bypass surgery (group B) was analysed. Study endpoints were ulcer healing, primary and secondary patency rate, limb salvage, and survival. Results: In total, FBE was performed in 73 patients and FBE with bypass in 60 patients. Between both groups, there were no significant differences regarding demographic data or the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) grade III and IV of femoropopliteal lesions. After 3 years, ulcer healing could be achieved in 72% of FBE and in 75% of FBE with bypass patients. The primary patency rate was 95% and 91% for FBE and 83% and 80% for FBE with bypass after one and three years, respectively. The 3-year limb-salvage rate was 78% for FBE and 84% for FBE with bypass. The secondary patency rate after one and three years was 99% and 97% for FBE and 93% and 88% for FBE with bypass. Conclusions: FBE and FBE with bypass are equally effective for ulcer healing in cases of combined CFA and superficial femoral artery lesions. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding primary and secondary patency rates, limb salvage rates and ulcer healing. Isolated FBE could be an alternative strategy in patients with higher operative risk.