OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to evaluate the use of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for the treatment of penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch. METHODS: Between January 2008 and January 2020, a total of 34 patients had the FET technique at 3 aortic centres. The indication for the FET technique was unsuitability for thoracic endovascular aortic repair due to the lack of a sufficient proximal landing zone even after supra-aortic rerouting (subclavian transposition, double transposition), ectasia of the ascending aorta/aortic arch (>40 mm) and/or a shaggy proximal thoracic aorta. RESULTS: Additional cardiac procedures were performed in 14 patients (41%), and the beating heart technique was used in 7 patients (21%). Perioperative mortality was 18% (n = 6); 3 of these patients had a major stroke (9%). No case of spinal cord ischaemia was observed, and 2 patients (6%) developed a non-disabling stroke. After a median follow-up of 7 (first quartile: 1; third quartile 29) months, 2 patients (6%) died (1 of malignant disease and 1 of an unclear cause); 10 additional aortic interventions in all aortic segments (29%; endovascular: n = 8 [24%] and conventional surgical: n = 2 [6%]) were performed in 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The FET technique is a good treatment option for patients with penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch unsuitable for thoracic endovascular aortic repair. However, the high obliterative atherosclerotic load in these patients is accompanied by an un-neglectable risk of perioperative neurological injury. Concomitant cardiac surgical procedures are frequently needed. Patients commonly require secondary aortic procedures in all aortic segments, emphasizing the need for thorough primary conceptual planning and stringent follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the conventional frozen elephant trunk implantation technique with a modified implantation technique with an aortic anastomosis in zone 1 and extra-anatomic revascularization of the left subclavian artery during reperfusion. METHODS: Between May 2014 and March 2018, 40 patients (26 male; mean age 60.2 ± 11.2 years) underwent complete aortic arch replacement with the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis™ (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Scotland) at our institution. Seventeen patients underwent conventional arch replacement (group 1) and 23 patients the modified procedure (group 2). Indication for arch replacement included all types of acute and chronic diseases. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (213.1 ± 53.5 vs 243.8 ± 67.0 min, P = 0.13) and aortic cross-clamp time (114.4 ± 40.7 vs 117.3 ± 56.6 min, P = 0.86) did not differ significantly between group 1 and 2. There was a trend towards a shorter circulatory arrest time (50.72 ± 9.6 vs 44.7 ± 15.5 min; P = 0.20) in group 2. Perioperative mortality was 10% (5.9% vs 13%; P = 0.62). Stroke occurred in 10% (5.9% vs 13%; P = 0.62) of patients. Spinal cord injury occurred in 7.5% of patients (11.8% vs 4.3% P = 0.57). Due to the a proximal aortic anastomosis, there was a significantly shorter coverage of the descending aorta with the prosthesis ending at vertebral level Th7.5 (6.75–8) in group 1 versus Th6.0 (5.0–6.0) in group 2 (P-value = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the frozen elephant trunk prosthesis in zone 1 allows for a more proximal aortic anastomosis that could make the procedure more feasible especially in patients with difficult anatomies or in an acute setting.

The aim of the study was to investigate the potential prognostic role of preoperative measurement of erector spinae myosteatosis with Hounsfield Unit Average Calculation (HUAC) as a marker for sarcopenia and frailty in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery (CABG). Preoperative computer tomography (CT) derived measurements of 479 consecutive patients undergoing CABG between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively performed. The erector spinae muscle at the level of the 12^th vertebra was manually outlined bilaterally on the axial CT slices and Hounsfield Unit Average Calculation (HUAC) was performed. The lower quartile of muscle density values was defined as myosteatotic and thus sarcopenic. Sarcopenic (n = 121) versus non-sarcopenic patients (n = 358) were compared regarding postoperative morbidity, short-term and long-term mortality. Results were adjusted for age, Body Mass Index (BMI), atrial fibrillation and hypertension using inverse probability weighting (IPW) Sarcopenia was associated with higher 30-day mortality (4.1% vs 0.8% p = 0.012), mid-term mortality after 1 year (9.3% vs 3.1% p = 0.047) and 2 years (10.8% vs 4.2% p = 0.047). Long-term mortality (5 years) was 20.8% for sarcopenic and 13.0% for non-sarcopenic patients but was not found to be significantly different (p = 0.089). Sarcopenia was associated with higher rates of reintubation (7.5% vs 1.1% p < 0.001), sternal wound infections (7.5% vs 2.8% p = 0.039) and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis (2.5% vs 0.4% p = 0.021). In patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, sarcopenia was associated with increased short-term mortality, mid-term mortality and morbidity. The measurement of erector spinae myosteatosis could be an easy and useful parameter in preoperative risk assessment.

: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures. METHODS: Forty departments shared their data on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures between January and May 2020 and January and May 2019 in Europe, Asia and the USA. Admission rates as well as delay from onset of symptoms to referral were compared. RESULTS: No differences in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures were observed between 2020 and the reference period in 2019 [incidence rates ratio (IRR): 0.96, confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.04; P = 0.39]. Also, no difference in the time interval from acute onset of symptoms to referral was recorded ( 12 h 68% in 2020, < 12 h 34% vs > 12 h 66% in 2019 P = 0.29). Conversely, a decline of 35% in elective procedures was seen (IRR: 0.81, CI 0.76–0.87; P < 0.001) with substantial differences between countries and the most pronounced decline in Italy (−40%, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in Switzerland, an increase in the number of elective cases was observed (+35%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no change in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic cases and procedures during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the case load of elective operations and procedures decreased significantly. Patients with acute aortic syndromes presented despite COVID-19 and were managed according to current guidelines. Further analysis is required to prove that deferral of elective cases had no impact on premature mortality.

We investigated the sex-related difference in characteristics and 2-year outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) by propensity-score matching (PSM). Data from 2 prospective registries, the INSPIRIS RESILIA Durability Registry (INDURE) and IMPACT, were merged, resulting in a total of 933 patients: 735 males and 253 females undergoing first-time SAVR. The PSM was performed to assess the impact of sex on the SAVR outcomes, yielding 433 males and 243 females with comparable baseline characteristics. Females had a lower body mass index (median 27.1 vs 28.0 kg/m²; P = 0.008), fewer bicuspid valves (52% vs 59%; P = 0.036), higher EuroSCORE II (mean 2.3 vs 1.8%; P < 0.001) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (mean 1.6 vs 0.9%; P < 0.001), were more often in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV (47% vs 30%; P < 0.001) and angina Canadian Cardiovascular Society III/IV (8.2% vs 4.4%; P < 0.001), but had a lower rate of myocardial infarction (1.9% vs 5.2%; P = 0.028) compared to males. These differences vanished after PSM, except for the EuroSCORE II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores, which were still significantly higher in females. Furthermore, females required smaller valves (median diameter 23.0 vs 25.0 mm, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the length of hospital stay (median 8 days) or intensive care unit stay (median 24 vs 25 hours) between the 2 sexes. At 2 years, post-SAVR outcomes were comparable between males and females, even after PSM. Despite females presenting with a significantly higher surgical risk profile, 2-year outcomes following SAVR were comparable between males and females.