Background and Objectives: Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with complex pathophysiological mechanisms involving oxidative and nitrosative stress. Recent research suggests that Indole-3-Propionic Acid (IPA) may have a neuroprotective role in reducing nitrosative stress. This study aims to elucidate the roles of IPA and nitrosative stress biomarkers in migraine patients, focusing on their potential as therapeutic targets. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, case-control study included 57 migraine patients and 30 healthy controls. Patients were categorized into episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) groups. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were documented through structured interviews. Validated scales such as the Visual Analog Score (VAS), Headache Impact Test 6 (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS), Migraine 24 h Quality of Life Scale (24 h QoL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Migraine Attacks–Subjective Cognitive Impairments Scale (Mig-SCog) were administered. Venous blood samples were collected, and serum levels of IPA, Nitric Oxide (NO), Nitric Oxide Synthase (NOS), and Peroxynitrite (ONOO⁻) were measured using ELISA and spectrophotometric methods. Results: Significant differences in serum IPA and NO levels were observed between migraine patients and controls. Specifically, higher serum IPA levels were found in the EM group, while higher serum NO levels were observed in the CM group. Elevated NO levels correlated with increased migraine attack frequency. Conversely, serum IPA levels showed a negative correlation with attack frequency, suggesting a protective role. Specifically, NO levels were positively correlated with the number of painful days, NSAID usage, VAS scores, HIT-6 scores, and MIDAS scores, while negatively correlated with 24 h QoL scores. Conclusions: The study highlights the significant involvement of IPA and nitrosative stress in migraine pathophysiology. Elevated IPA levels, particularly in EM patients, suggest its potential neuroprotective role. These findings underscore the importance of targeting oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways in developing effective migraine therapies.

Background and purpose – Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is characterized by vasogenic edema, usually reversible, with the prominent involvement of the parietal and occipital lobes. The exact etiopathogenesis leading to PRES is unknown. Because signs of eclampsia and preeclampsia in neuroimaging often overlap and manifest as PRES, we aimed to evaluate whether demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters predict PRES in patients with preeclampsia or eclampsia. Methods – 213 pre-eclampsia or eclampsia patients with cranial imaging were retrospectively examined. We recorded the patients’ demographic information, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), hemogram, biochemical indicators, clinical symptoms, and imaging features. Results – Of all patients, 69% (n = 147) had preeclampsia while 31% (n = 66) had eclampsia, and 24.4% (n = 53) were diagnosed with PRES. The mean age of patients who developed PRES was 25.81 ± 6.07 years and thus significantly less than that of patients who did not develop PRES (p = .000). Patients with PRES had significantly higher mean SBP (p = .015), DBP (p = .009), and MAP (p = .003) than patients without PRES, along with significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT; p = .001), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT; p = .001) blood urea nitrogen (BUN; p = .001), white blood cell (WBC; p = .003), neutrophil (p = .001), and hemoglobin (Hb; p = .027) levels, but significantly lower albumin (p = .000) levels. Conclusion – Age, high blood pressure, and BUN, neutrophil, and WBC levels were predictors of the development of PRES in patients with preeclampsia and eclampsia. Early neuroimaging considering those predictors should be performed to diagnose PRES in patients with preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the clinical and demographic profiles of patients undergoing electroencephalography (EEG) over one year, evaluate EEG's impact on patient management, and ascertain the appropriateness of EEG requests. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in the neurophysiology department at XXX University Faculty of Medicine over 12 months from October 2022 to October 2023. The study included the EEG request to the neurophysiology department; pediatrics and the cases that had artifacts or technical issues were excluded. Age, gender, imaging characteristics, EEG findings, and the reasons for EEG requests were recorded. The contribution of EEG to patient management was analyzed. Results: The study included 1217 patients with a mean age of 34.4±16.5 years, ranging from 18 to 90 years. Of these, 656 were female and 561 male. A history of epilepsy was reported in 821 patients. Neurology outpatient clinics, inpatient wards, and intensive care units requested the majority of EEGs. Epilepsy, presyncope/syncope, and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) were the top reasons for EEG requests. Among the newly diagnosed epilepsy patients, 13 showed abnormal EEG results. The study identified MRI abnormalities in 202 patients, with a 27% concordance between EEG and MRI findings. EEG significantly influenced patient management in 577 cases (46.5%), demonstrating its crucial role in clinical decision-making. Conclusion: EEG's diagnostic value, particularly in epilepsy and complex neurological conditions, remains unique. Advocating suiting EEG requests and increasing physician knowledge of seizures can optimize patient care and resource use.