Anatoly N. Sapozhnikov

Dr. Anatoly N. Sapozhnikov


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 November 2020 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNikita Chukanov
Nikita Chukanov
ASAnatoly N. Sapozhnikov
Anatoly N. Sapozhnikov
RSRoman Shendrik
Roman Shendrik
MVMarina F. Vigasina
Marina F. Vigasina
RSRalf Steudel
Ralf Steudel
Five samples of differently colored sodalite-group minerals from gem lazurite deposits were studied by means of electron microprobe and wet chemical analyses, infrared, Raman, electron spin resonance (ESR) and UV-Visible spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. Various extra-framework components (SO42−, S2− and Cl− anions, S3•−, S2•− and SO3•− radical anions, H2O, CO2, COS, cis- as well as trans- or gauche-S4 neutral molecules have been identified. It is shown that S3•− and S4 are the main blue and purple chromophores, respectively, whereas the S2•− yellow chromophore and SO3•− blue chromophore play a subordinate role. X-ray diffraction patterns of all samples of sodalite-group minerals from lazurite deposits studied in this work contain superstructure reflections which indicate different kinds of incommensurate modulation of the structures.

1 December 2010 in Russian Chemical Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLM. V. Lesnichaya
M. V. Lesnichaya
GAG. P. Aleksandrova
G. P. Aleksandrova
LFL. P. Feoktistova
L. P. Feoktistova
ASAnatoly N. Sapozhnikov
Anatoly N. Sapozhnikov
TFT. V. Fadeeva
T. V. Fadeeva
BTB. A. Trofimov
B. A. Trofimov

14 July 2022 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNikita Chukanov
Nikita Chukanov
RSRoman Shendrik
Roman Shendrik
MVMarina F. Vigasina
Marina F. Vigasina
Igor V.  PekovIgor V. Pekov
Igor V. Pekov
ASAnatoly N. Sapozhnikov
Anatoly N. Sapozhnikov
DVDmitry Varlamov
Dmitry Varlamov
Isomorphic substitutions of extra-framework components in sodalite-group aluminosilicate minerals and their thermal conversions have been investigated using infrared, Raman, electron spin resonance (ESR), as well as ultraviolet, visible and near infrared (UV–Vis–near IR) absorption spectroscopy methods and involving chemical and X-ray diffraction data. Sodalite-related minerals from gem lazurite deposits (haüyne, lazurite, and slyudyankaite) are characterized by wide variations in S-bearing extra-framework components including SO42− and various polysulfide groups (S2●−, S3●−, S4●− radical anions, and S4 and S6 neutral molecules) as well as the presence of CO2 molecules. Heating at 700 °C under reducing conditions results in the transformation of initial S-bearing groups SO42− and S3●− to a mixture of S2−, HS−, S2●−, and S4●− and transformation of CO2 to a mixture of CO32− and C2O42− or HC2O4− anionic groups. Further heating at 800 °C in air results in the decomposition of carbonate and oxalate groups, restoration of the SO42− and S3●− groups, and a sharp transformation of the framework. The HS− anion is stable only under reducing conditions, whereas the S3●− radical anion is the most stable polysulfide group. The HS−-dominant sodalite-group mineral sapozhnikovite forms a wide solid-solution series with sodalite. The conditions required for the formation of HS−- and CO20-bearing sodalite-group minerals are discussed.

18 November 2022 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNikita Chukanov
Nikita Chukanov
NSNadezhda Shchipalkina
Nadezhda Shchipalkina
RSRoman Shendrik
Roman Shendrik
MVMarina F. Vigasina
Marina F. Vigasina
VTVladimir Tauson
Vladimir Tauson
Igor V.  PekovIgor V. Pekov
Igor V. Pekov
The isomorphism of S-bearing feldspathoids belonging to the cancrinite, sodalite, tugtupite, vladimirivanovite, bystrite, marinellite and scapolite structure types has been investigated using a multimethodical approach based on infrared, Raman and electron spin resonance (ESR), as well as ultraviolet, visible and near infrared (UV–Vis–near IR) absorption spectroscopy methods and involving chemical and X-ray diffraction data. Sapozhnikovite Na8(Al6Si6O24)(HS)2 and sulfite and thiosulfate analogues of cancrinite are synthesized hydrothermally and characterized by means of electron microprobe analyses, powder X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. The possibility of the incorporation of significant amounts of SO42−, S4 and SO32− in the crystal structures of cancrisilite, sulfhydrylbystrite and marinellite, respectively, has been established for the first time. Thermal conversions of S-bearing groups in the synthetic sulfite cancrinite and sapozhnikovite analogues as well as natural vladinirivanovite and S4-bearing haüyne under oxidizing and reducing conditions have been studied using the multimethodical approach. The SO42− and S2− anions and the S3•– radical anion are the most stable S-bearing species under high-temperature conditions (in the range of 700–800 °C); their ratio in the heated samples is determined by the redox conditions and charge-balance requirement. The HS− and S52− anions are stable only under highly reducing conditions.

1 December 2012 in Geology of Ore Deposits
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAnatoly N. Sapozhnikov
Anatoly N. Sapozhnikov
EKEkaterina Kaneva
Ekaterina Kaneva
DCD. I. Cherepanov
D. I. Cherepanov
LSL. F. Suvorova
L. F. Suvorova
VLV. I. Levitsky
V. I. Levitsky
LRL. Z. Reznitsky
L. Z. Reznitsky
The results of an examination of vladimirivanovite, a new mineral of the sodalite group, found at the Tultui deposit in the Baikal region are discussed. The mineral occurs in the form of outer rims (0.01–3 mm thick) of lazurite, elongated segregations without faced crystals (0.2 to 3–4 mm in size; less frequently, 4 × 12–15 × 20 mm), and rare veinlets (up to 5 mm) hosted in calciphyre and marble. Vladimirivanovite is irregular and patchy dark blue. The mineral is brittle; on average, the microhardness VHN is 522–604, 575 kg/mm2; and the Mohs hardness is 5.0–5.5. The measured and calculated densities are 2.48(3) and 2.436 g/cm3, respectively. Vladimirivanovite is optically biaxial; 2V meas = 63(±1)°, 2V calc = 66.2°; the refractive indices are α = 1.502–1.507 (±0.002), N m = 1.509–1.514 (±0.002), and N g = 1.512–1.517 (±0.002). The chemical composition is as follows, wt %: 32.59 SiO2, 27.39 Al2O3, 7.66 CaO, 17.74 Na2O, 11.37 SO3, 1.94 S, 0.12 Cl, and 1.0 H2O; total is 99.62. The empirical formula calculated based on (Si + Al) = 12 with sulfide sulfur determined from the charge balance is Na6.36Ca1.52(Si6.03Al5.97)Σ12O23.99(SO4)1.58(S3)0.17(S2)0.08 · Cl0.04 · 0.62H2O; the idealized formula is Na6Ca2[Al6Si6O24](SO4,S3,S2,Cl)2 · H2O. The new mineral is orthorhombic, space group Pnaa; the unit-cell dimensions are a = 9.066, b = 12.851, c = 38.558 Å, V = 4492 Å3, and Z = 6. The strongest reflections in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern (dÅ—I[hkl]) are: 6.61–5[015], 6.43–11[020, 006], 3.71–100[119, 133], 2.623–30[20.12, 240], 2.273–6[04.12], 2.141–14[159, 13.15], 1.783–9[06.12, 04.18], and 1.606–6[080, 00.24]. The crystal structure has been solved with a single crystal. The mineral was named in memoriam of Vladimir Georgievich Ivanov (1947–2002), Russian mineralogist and geochemist. The type material of the mineral is deposited at the Mineralogical Museum of St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.

4 May 2023 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNadezhda B. Bolotina
Nadezhda B. Bolotina
ASAnatoly N. Sapozhnikov
Anatoly N. Sapozhnikov
NCNikita Chukanov
Nikita Chukanov
MVMarina F. Vigasina
Marina F. Vigasina
Lazurite and other lazurite-related minerals (LRMs) containing sulfur in both sulfate and sulfide forms are sodalite-type compounds with various extraframework species, of which the tendency to order leads to structural modulations with a period that is either commensurate or incommensurate with the period of the basic lattice. In this work, the structures of incommensurately modulated monoclinic LRMs are re-examined based on the superstructure of slyudyankaite, formerly known as triclinic lazurite. Similarities and differences between three one-dimensionally modulated LRMs and cubic LRM structures modulated in several directions are discussed. Assumptions are made on how the symmetry of the structure and the composition of the crystal can affect the period of structural modulation.