Claudio Lovisolo

Dr. Claudio Lovisolo

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2003 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NUNorbert Uehlein
Norbert Uehlein
Claudio LovisoloClaudio Lovisolo
Claudio Lovisolo
FSFranka Siefritz
Franka Siefritz
RKRalf Kaldenhoff
Ralf Kaldenhoff

3 February 2010 in Functional Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Claudio LovisoloClaudio Lovisolo
Claudio Lovisolo
IPIrene Perrone
Irene Perrone
ACAndrea Carra
Andrea Carra
Alessandra FerrandinoAlessandra Ferrandino
Alessandra Ferrandino
JFJaume Flexas Flexas
Jaume Flexas Flexas
ASAndrea Schubert
Andrea Schubert
This review deals with grapevine responses to water stress by examining perturbations to physiological and molecular processes at the root, shoot, leaf and berry levels. Long-distance signalling among organs is also considered. Isohydric or anisohydric Vitis genotypes are described in relation to their response to drought, which is linked to stomatal behaviour. Stomatal regulation of grapevine under abscisic acid and hydraulic control (the latter being linked to embolism formation and recovery in water pathways upstream the stomata) is reviewed and linked to impairments of photosynthetic assimilation. We define three stages of photosynthesis regulation in grapevines that are subjected to progressive water stress on the basis of the main causes of assimilation decline. Early and late contributions of aquaporins, which play a fundamental role in water stress control, are discussed. Metabolic mechanisms of dehydration tolerance are rewieved, and variation linked to differences in transcript abundance of genes involved in osmoregulation, photosynthesis, photorespiration, detoxification of free radicals and coping with photoinhibition. Results of these defence strategies accumulated in berries are reviewed, together with perturbations of their molecular pathways. Features observed in different organs show that grapevine fits well as a complex model plant for molecular and physiological studies on plant drought avoidance/tolerance.

1 April 2002 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFranka Siefritz
Franka Siefritz
MTMelvin T. Tyree
Melvin T. Tyree
Claudio LovisoloClaudio Lovisolo
Claudio Lovisolo
ASAndrea Schubert
Andrea Schubert
RKRalf Kaldenhoff
Ralf Kaldenhoff
SAG101, a leaf senescence-associated gene, was cloned from an Arabidopsis leaf senescence enhancer trap line and functionally characterized. Reporter gene and RNA gel blot analyses revealed that SAG101 was not expressed until the onset of senescence in leaves. A recombinant SAG101 fusion protein overexpressed in Escherichia coli displayed acyl hydrolase activity. Antisense RNA interference in transgenic plants delayed the onset of leaf senescence for ∼4 days. Chemically induced overexpression of SAG101 caused precocious senescence in both attached and detached leaves of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. These data suggest that SAG101 plays a significant role in leaf senescence.

5 February 2008 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RKRalf Kaldenhoff
Ralf Kaldenhoff
MRMiquel Ribas‐Carbo
Miquel Ribas‐Carbo
JFJaume Flexas Flexas
Jaume Flexas Flexas
Claudio LovisoloClaudio Lovisolo
Claudio Lovisolo
MHMarlies Heckwolf
Marlies Heckwolf
NUNorbert Uehlein
Norbert Uehlein


26 September 2016 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IVIvan VISENTIN
Ivan VISENTIN
MVMarco Vitali
Marco Vitali
MFManuela Ferrero
Manuela Ferrero
YZYanxia Zhang
Yanxia Zhang
CRCarolien Ruyter‐Spira
Carolien Ruyter‐Spira
Francesca CardinaleFrancesca Cardinale
Francesca Cardinale
Summary: Strigolactones (SL) contribute to drought acclimatization in shoots, because SL‐depleted plants are hypersensitive to drought due to stomatal hyposensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA). However, under drought, SL biosynthesis is repressed in roots, suggesting organ specificity in their metabolism and role. Because SL can be transported acropetally, such a drop may also affect shoots, as a systemic indication of stress. We investigated this hypothesis by analysing molecularly and physiologically wild‐type (WT) tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) scions grafted onto SL‐depleted rootstocks, compared with self‐grafted WT and SL‐depleted genotypes, during a drought time‐course. Shoots receiving few SL from the roots behaved as if under mild stress even if irrigated. Their stomata were hypersensitive to ABA (likely via a localized enhancement of SL synthesis in shoots). Exogenous SL also enhanced stomata sensitivity to ABA. As the partial shift of SL synthesis from roots to shoots mimics what happens under drought, a reduction of root‐produced SL might represent a systemic signal unlinked from shootward ABA translocation, and sufficient to prime the plant for better stress avoidance.