Fabio Fruggiero

Prof. Fabio Fruggiero

School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Via Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 February 2023 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSotirios Panagou
Sotirios Panagou
WNW. Patrick Neumann
W. Patrick Neumann
FFFabio Fruggiero
Fabio Fruggiero
Interaction between humans and robots in the workplace garners interest in recent years due to the introduction of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 frameworks. A scoping review was performed aimed at investigating the effect of robot design features on their human counterparts. In the analysis of the 32 identified articles, the robot design features used in the literature are shown along with the effects on the operators. Results showcased the many to many relationships between robot design features and effects on operators. Robot appearance, for example, and capabilities play a role in the operators’ perception and expectations of their capabilities based on the task and subsequently perceived reliability and safety. Communication capabilities between operators and robots is an integral part for teamwork and performance as it can affect work processes. The paucity of papers empirically addressing human robot interaction as a system is consistent with results from previous literature, indicating the need for more research. The results of this investigation can prove useful in the form of advice to designers and practitioners, such as the operator’s involvement in implementation, knowledge on robots’ capabilities and training. Research gaps identified are discussed, as well as future research directions.

1 January 2017 in International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GCG. Costabile
G. Costabile
Marcello FeraMarcello Fera
Marcello Fera
FFFabio Fruggiero
Fabio Fruggiero
ALA. Lambiase
A. Lambiase
Duc PhamDuc Pham
Duc Pham
From the past decades, increasing attention has been paid to the quality level of technological and mechanical properties achieved by the Additive Manufacturing (AM); these two elements have achieved a good performance, and it is possible to compare this with the results achieved by traditional technology. Therefore, the AM maturity is high enough to let industries adopt this technology in a more general production framework as the mechanical manufacturing industrial one is. Since the technological and mechanical properties are also beneficial for the materials produced with AM, the primary objective of this paper is to focus more on managerial facets, such as the cost control of a production environment, where these new technologies are present. This paper aims to analyse the existing literature about the cost models developed specifically for AM from an operations management point of view and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of all models

12 March 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMilena Nacchia
Milena Nacchia
FFFabio Fruggiero
Fabio Fruggiero
ALAlfredo Lambiase
Alfredo Lambiase
DODanny O'Connell Danny O'Connell
Danny O'Connell Danny O'Connell
The increasing availability of data, gathered by sensors and intelligent machines, is changing the way decisions are made in the manufacturing sector. In particular, based on predictive approach and facilitated by the nowadays growing capabilities of hardware, cloud-based solutions, and new learning approaches, maintenance can be scheduled—over cell engagement and resource monitoring—when required, for minimizing (or managing) unexpected equipment failures, improving uptime through less aggressive maintenance schedules, shortening unplanned downtime, reducing excess (direct and indirect) cost, reducing long-term damage to machines and processes, and improve safety plans. With access to increased levels of data (and over learning mechanisms), companies have the capability to conduct statistical tests using machine learning algorithms, in order to uncover root causes of problems previously unknown. This study analyses the maturity level and contributions of machine learning methods for predictive maintenance. An upward trend in publications for predictive maintenance using machine learning techniques was identified with the USA and China leading. A mapping study—steady set until early 2019 data—was employed as a formal and well-structured method to synthesize material and to report on pervasive areas of research. Type of equipment, sensors, and data are mapped to properly assist new researchers in positioning new research activities in the domain of smart maintenance. Hence, in this paper, we focus on data-driven methods for predictive maintenance (PdM) with a comprehensive survey on applications and methods until, for the sake of commenting on stable proposal, 2019 (early included). An equal repartition between evaluation and validation studies was identified, this being a symptom of an immature but growing research area. In addition, the type of contribution is mainly in the form of models and methodologies. Vibrational signal was marked as the most used data set for diagnosis in manufacturing machinery monitoring; furthermore, supervised learning is reported as the most used predictive approach (ensemble learning is growing fast). Neural networks, followed by random forests and support vector machines, were identified as the most applied methods encompassing 40% of publications, of which 67% related to deep neural network with long short-term memory predominance. Notwithstanding, there is no robust approach (no one reported optimal performance over different case tests) that works best for every problem. We finally conclude the research in this area is moving fast to gather a separate focused analysis over the last two years (whenever stable implementations will appear).

30 October 2017 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marcello FeraMarcello Fera
Marcello Fera
RMR. Macchiaroli
R. Macchiaroli
FFFabio Fruggiero
Fabio Fruggiero
ALA. Lambiase
A. Lambiase

1 January 2018 in International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFM. Fera
M. Fera
FFFabio Fruggiero
Fabio Fruggiero
ALA. Lambiase
A. Lambiase
RMR. Macchiaroli
R. Macchiaroli
VTV. Todisco
V. Todisco

16 May 2017 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marcello FeraMarcello Fera
Marcello Fera
FFFabio Fruggiero
Fabio Fruggiero
GCG. Costabile
G. Costabile
ALA. Lambiase
A. Lambiase
Duc PhamDuc Pham
Duc Pham