Digoxin intoxication results in predominantly digestive, cardiac and neurological symptoms. This case is outstanding in that the intoxication occurred in a nonagenarian and induced severe, extensively documented visual symptoms as well as dysphagia and proprioceptive illusions. Moreover, it went undiagnosed for a whole month despite close medical follow-up, illustrating the difficulty in recognizing drug-induced effects in a polymorbid patient. Digoxin 0.25 mg qd for atrial fibrillation was prescribed to a 91-year-old woman with an estimated creatinine clearance of 18 ml/min. Over the following 2–3 weeks she developed nausea, vomiting and dysphagia, snowy and blurry vision, photopsia, dyschromatopsia, aggravated pre-existing formed visual hallucinations and proprioceptive illusions. She saw her family doctor twice and visited the eye clinic once until, 1 month after starting digoxin, she was admitted to the emergency room. Intoxication was confirmed by a serum digoxin level of 5.7 ng/ml (reference range 0.8–2 ng/ml). After stopping digoxin, general symptoms resolved in a few days, but visual complaints persisted. Examination by the ophthalmologist revealed decreased visual acuity in both eyes, 4/10 in the right eye (OD) and 5/10 in the left eye (OS), decreased color vision as demonstrated by a score of 1/13 in both eyes (OU) on Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates, OS cataract, and dry age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Computerized static perimetry showed non-specific diffuse alterations suggestive of either bilateral retinopathy or optic neuropathy. Full-field electroretinography (ERG) disclosed moderate diffuse rod and cone dysfunction and multifocal ERG revealed central loss of function OU. Visual symptoms progressively improved over the next 2 months, but multifocal ERG did not. The patient was finally discharged home after a 5 week hospital stay. This case is a reminder of a complication of digoxin treatment to be considered by any treating physician. If digoxin is prescribed in a vulnerable patient, close monitoring is mandatory. In general, when facing a new health problem in a polymorbid patient, it is crucial to elicit a complete history, with all recent drug changes and detailed complaints, and to include a drug adverse reaction in the differential diagnosis.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can affect the disposition of drugs, notably by sequestering them in a circuit. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of existing ex vivo studies investigating the impact of contemporary ECMO circuits on drug sequestration, and to examine the associations between the physicochemical properties of drugs, the features and settings of ECMO devices, and the extent of drug sequestration. Method: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify ex vivo studies that determined drug concentrations in ECMO circuits. Studies that did not allow for the proper assessment of drug loss by degradation were excluded. Drug characteristics and experimental conditions were recorded. Drug sequestration in the circuit was calculated as the difference between the drug loss measured in the ECMO circuit and the drug loss due to spontaneous degradation measured under control conditions. To identify predictors of drug sequestration, a stepwise multiple linear meta-regression was applied by testing the physicochemical properties of drugs and ECMO device features/settings. Results: A total of 40 studies were identified, of which 21 were included in the analysis, covering 41 drugs. The Maquet membrane oxygenator was the most used brand (73%). About half of the circuits were adult and half were pediatric. Our final regression model retained lipophilicity, and to a lesser extent ionization at a physiological pH, as significant predictors of drug sequestration (R² 0.44, relative standard error 23%). Protein binding had no additional effect. Anti-infectives were the most studied class of drugs (n = 28). Antibiotics were overall not significantly sequestered, while lipophilic drugs such as posaconazole, voriconazole, paracetamol, fentanyl, sufentanil, propofol, thiopental, dexmedetomidine and amiodarone were highly sequestered (≥50%). However, this sequestration occurred mainly within the first few hours of the experiments, possibly reflecting a saturation effect. Conclusions: Lipophilic drugs are significantly sequestered in ex vivo ECMO circuits, although this effect may be limited by early saturation.

The antiparasitic drug ivermectin is approved for persons > 15 kg in the US and EU. A pharmacometric (PMX) population model with clinical PK data was developed (i) to characterize the effect of the patient-friendly ivermectin formulation CHILD-IVITAB on the absorption process and (ii) to evaluate dosing for studies in children < 15 kg. Simulations were performed to identify dosing with CHILD-IVITAB associated with similar exposure coverage in children ≥ 15 kg and < 15 kg as observed in adults receiving the reference formulation STROMECTOL^®. A total of 448 ivermectin concentrations were available from 16 healthy adults. The absorption rate constant was 2.41 h⁻¹ (CV 19%) for CHILD-IVITAB vs. 1.56 h⁻¹ (CV 43%) for STROMECTOL^®. Simulations indicated that 250 µg/kg of CHILD-IVITAB is associated with exposure coverage in children < 15 kg consistent with that observed in children ≥ 15 kg and adults receiving 200 µg/kg of STROMECTOL^®. Performed analysis confirmed that CHILD-IVITAB is associated with faster and more controlled absorption than STROMECTOL^®. Simulations indicate that 250 µg/kg of CHILD-IVITAB achieves equivalent ivermectin exposure coverage in children < 15 kg as seen in children ≥ 15 kg and adults.