Light pollution has been receiving increased attention worldwide. Scientific research has provided convincing evidence that ties artificial lighting to health-related issues. Consequently, the involved parties are now leaned towards the implementation of regulations to help limit the use of artificial lighting. Many countries, together with international organizations, have embarked on setting standards and regulations aimed at halting the excessive and improper usage of artificial lighting, there-by eradicating light pollution and its effects. In Korea, outdoor lighting at night is a common phenomenon. Moreover, as the economic development grows even further, the use of artificial lighting is expected to increase making Korea vulnerable to the adverse effects of artificial lighting. In this study, we discuss the issue of light pollution based on field measurements conducted in Seoul, South Korea. The measurements were undertaken to broaden the understanding and assessment of light pollution. During the investigation, we noted that the most severe forms of light pollution were found in developed urban and densely commercialized areas. Currently, there are ongoing light pollution measurement projects around the entire Korea. It would be informative to see how the rest of South Korea compares to the Capital, Seoul in terms of light pollution levels.

In South Korea, sunlight rights and daylight rights are legally distinguished, yet no standardized methodology exists for their quantitative assessment. Current evaluations of sunlight rights are narrowly defined, relying on the duration of direct solar penetration at the window center during the winter solstice, while excluding reflected and diffuse light. This restrictive approach has led to confusion among both researchers and legal practitioners, as it diverges from daylighting evaluations that account for indoor brightness and energy performance. The recent enactment of regulations to secure solar access in schools has further intensified disputes between educational institutions striving to protect students’ visual comfort and developers seeking to maximize building potential. To address this gap, this study proposes an evaluation framework tailored to the Korean context. A reference classroom model representative of standard Korean schools was developed, and simulations were conducted by introducing obstructing building masses to block direct sunlight. The methodology evaluated key variables, including time of day and solar altitude, and analyzed daylighting performance and lighting-related energy consumption under obstructed conditions. The results show that blocking sunlight through south-facing windows reduces daylighting performance by 89% to 98%, leading to additional reliance on artificial lighting, with energy use increasing between 128 Wh and 768 Wh. These findings underscore the limitations of current legal interpretations based solely on sunlight duration and highlight the necessity of adopting performance-based evaluation methods. Protecting school sunlight rights through such approaches is essential to enhancing classroom visual environments and reducing energy demand.