Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy across different treatment lines in patients with pleural mesothelioma. It also sought to identify factors influencing the success of immunotherapy, such as histological subtype, PD-L1 expression, type of asbestos exposure, and metastatic status. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with 60 patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma. Data on age, gender, histological subtype, and asbestos exposure were collected for all patients and PD-L1 expression was assessed in a subset of patients. Patients received either chemotherapy or immunotherapy as first-, second-, and third-line treatments, and progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment responses were evaluated. Results: Among the 60 patients, 35 (58.3%) were male and the median age was 59 years. The majority (71.7%) had epithelioid histology and 28.3% had distant metastases. Asbestos exposure was documented in 65% of the cases. PD-L1 expression of ≥1% was found in 13 of 17 patients tested. First-line treatments included immunotherapy for 11 patients and chemotherapy for the others, with immunotherapy achieving median PFS of 9 months versus 6 months for chemotherapy, although the difference was not statistically significant. In third-line treatments, immunotherapy significantly outperformed chemotherapy with median PFS of 6 months compared to 3 months (p = 0.048). Absence of metastasis and prior asbestos exposure in an endemic region were linked to better immunotherapy outcomes. Conclusion: Immunotherapy shows increased efficacy in later treatment lines for pleural mesothelioma, especially for patients without metastases or with prior endemic asbestos exposure. Tailored therapeutic strategies should be further explored in prospective studies.

Objective: Primary gastric lymphomas, which make up the vast majority of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, are rare and the most common subtype is primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL). In our study, we investigated the clinical and prognostic factors of this lymphoma type as a single-center experience. Materials and Methods: Between January 2001 and February 2021, 91 patients aged ≥18 years, registered with the diagnosis of primary gastric DLBCL, diagnosed histopathologically, and whose evaluation parameters were reached, were retrospectively scanned. Results: The median age of 91 patients with a diagnosis of PG-DLBCL was 58 (20–81, minimum–maximum) years. Of the patients, 64.8% were men and 35.2% were women. While the number of patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 0–2 (low–low-intermediate risk) was 54 (59.4%), the number of patients with an IPI score of 3 (high intermediate) was 19 (20.9%), and the number of patients with an IPI score of 4–5 (high risk) was 18 (19.8%). While 52.7% of the patients had a complete response, 20.9% had a partial response, 3.3% had stable disease, and 23.1% had progressive disease. The 10-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients, respectively, were 52.1% and 53.2%. We found factors affecting survival in univariate analysis; age groups (≤60/>60), ECOG groups (0-1/≥2), Lugano stage (I-II/III-IV), LDH level (normal/high), IPI risk groups (low/low-intermediate/high-intermediate/high) and radiotherapy (yes/no). In multivariate analysis, only; age groups (≤60/>60) and IPI risk groups (low/low-intermediate/high-intermediate/high) were found to be independent factors affecting survival. In addition, in our study, we determined that the division of the IPI intermediate risk group into low intermediate and high intermediate is one of the factors predicting prognosis. Conclusions: Few studies of PG-DLBCL have investigated the long-term survival rates of patients and primarily examined small patient groups because of the low incidence of the disease. In our study, we think that detailed evaluation of age and especially IPI risk groups play a role in predicting survival.

Introduction: In the adjuvant treatment of low-risk stage III colon cancer treated surgically, 3 months of CAPOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine is not a common clinical practice. Since there are no data on this practice in the literature, we have no idea how often it is used. However, it should be noted that this application is used in some centers due to the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin but there are insufficient data in the literature on its efficacy. Methods: The data of patients with colon cancer treated surgically who were followed up in 12 different oncology centers in Turkey between November 2004 and June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The study included 194 patients. The treatment arms were as follows: 3 months of CAPOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine = arm A and CAPOX/FOLFOX (6 months) = arm B. There were 78 patients (40.2%) in arm A and 116 patients (59.8%) in arm B. The median age and sex distribution were similar between the treatment arms. The median follow-up period of all patients was 34.4 months (95% confidence interval, 29.1–39.7). When arm A was compared with arm B, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.3% versus 88.4% and 5-year DFS was 75.3% versus 82.8%, respectively. There were similar DFS outcomes between the treatment arms (p = 0.09). Rates of any grade of neuropathy were numerically lower in arm A, but the difference between the treatment arms was not statistically significant (51.3% vs. 56.9%; p = 0.44). The frequency of neutropenia was similar between the treatment arms. Conclusion: In this study, the efficacy and safety of the 3 months of CAPOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine chemotherapy regimen in the adjuvant treatment of low-risk stage III colon cancer treated surgically were proven. This result may also support the discontinuation of oxaliplatin at 3 months while continuing fluoropyrimidines, which is a common clinical practice but lacks sufficient data.

Background and Objectives: Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is a rare and aggressive mucosal melanoma with a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity and nonspecific clinical presentation, diagnosis is often delayed, and prognostic data remain limited. Methods: In this retrospective study, 17 patients diagnosed with ARMM were identified from a cohort of 404 malignant melanoma cases treated at our center; however, only 14 patients with complete clinical and pathological data were included in the final analysis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data were collected. Disease stage, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and potential prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 58 ± 12 years, and six patients (42.9%) were female. The median follow-up duration was 13.3 months, and the median OS was 12.6 months. Six patients (42.9%) were initially misdiagnosed due to overlapping symptoms with benign anorectal conditions. At presentation, seven patients had localized disease, while six had distant metastases. Univariate analysis identified male sex and liver metastasis as adverse prognostic factors for OS; however, these associations were not statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: ARMM is associated with poor survival outcomes, and liver metastasis and male sex may be linked to worse prognosis. Diagnostic delay is common due to nonspecific symptoms and frequent initial misdiagnosis, highlighting the need for increased clinical awareness. Further large-scale studies are warranted to better define prognostic markers and optimize management strategies.

Background and Objectives: Despite developments in cervical cancer (CC) treatment, an advanced stage is a poor prognostic factor. Cervical cancer is an immunogenic tumor in which viruses, like HPV, play a role in carcinogenesis. Therefore, systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs) may have prognostic value. Most studies on SIMs focus on the early stage by evaluating pretreatment levels. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic and predictive values of both pretreatment and post-treatment parameters at the advanced stage, as well as treatment efficacy after progression with first-line treatment. Materials and Methods: A total of 133 advanced-stage CC patients with progression on first-line platin–paclitaxel and bevacizumab were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic and histopathological characteristics were recorded along with treatment details. Pre-treatment baseline blood parameters and post-treatment follow-up values were recorded to calculate SIMs as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI). Results: Median values for SIMs were accepted as cut-off values. Post-treatment values demonstrated stronger predictive power, with pre-treatment SIRI and NLR being significant only in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. High post-treatment SIRI (>2.1) was correlated with shorter overall survival (OS) and considered a poor prognostic factor. High post-treatment SIRI (>2.1), -SII (>746), and -PLR (>197) emerged as independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Their prognostic values were clearer in the whole population and the metachronous metastatic subgroup. Rechallenge of platinum-based chemotherapy was an option for those who had at least 6 months of PFS with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Bevacizumab addition to single-agent or combination regimens led to improved ORR as well. Conclusions: Post-treatment SIRI is a promising prognostic factor for OS, while post-treatment SIRI, SII, and PLR may serve as convenient SIMs for PFS. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy reinduction is a feasible second-line treatment strategy, especially with the addition of bevacizumab.