Tatiana Iretskaia

Ms. Tatiana Iretskaia

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 June 2022 in Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EPElizabeth Perry
Elizabeth Perry
XXXiao Xiao
Xiao Xiao
TITatiana Iretskaia
Tatiana Iretskaia
PLPeizhe Li
Peizhe Li
RMRobert E. Manning
Robert E. Manning
NRNathan P. Reigner
Nathan P. Reigner

1 November 2022 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDan McCole
Dan McCole
TITatiana Iretskaia
Tatiana Iretskaia
EPElizabeth Perry
Elizabeth Perry
Jungho SuhJungho Suh
Jungho Suh
JNJohn Noyes
John Noyes
At a time when many public park and recreational programs are required by local governments to be financially self-sustaining, it is critical for planners to design a new development with the end-user in mind. Feasibility studies often either do not examine user preferences or use Likert-type surveys to investigate features in isolation without evaluating trade-offs from financial and finite space limitations. This study used stated preference choice method (SPCM) to inform the initial design of an off-road vehicle (ORV) park. The park was developed near Detroit, Michigan, a metropolitan area with many registered ORVs, but few places to legally use them. The SPCM examined trade-offs among desired features and helped planners ensure publicly funded investments resulted in a successful park. Researchers mailed a survey with choice sets to 3935 registered ORV users and 2083 completed surveys were retuned (53%). Additional survey items also allowed researchers to create preference models for specific segments of users (i.e., serious ORV enthusiasts/casual users; residents/visitors; or users of different ORV types). The findings informed the design of the park by revealing preferences for segments, allowing planners to design the park for specific markets. The park’s initial success suggests a study in the design stage of development offers utility, though park managers have noticed unanticipated user segments that influence preferences for park features. The findings based on segments also suggest planners should be cautious when designing to an average user. Implications of this study are helpful to planners of any capital-intensive land-use project, especially in the public sector.

28 August 2024 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAllison McCurdy
Allison McCurdy
EPElizabeth Perry
Elizabeth Perry
Jessica LeahyJessica Leahy
Jessica Leahy
KCKimberly Coleman
Kimberly Coleman
JDJoshua Doyle
Joshua Doyle
MDMikael Deliyski
Mikael Deliyski
E-biking is alluring for its various physical, environmental, and financial benefits and the ability to travel farther and faster, and being physically easier to ride than astride an analog (traditional) bicycle. E-bikes are also a source of controversy, especially in places where analog bicycles have been allowed but e-bikes represent a “slippery slope” of technology permissions and/or in situations where the function of e-bikes may increase concerns about safety. Despite an increase in use and conversation about such use, academic literature focused on e-bikes’ social aspects remains sparse. The objective of this work is to describe the existing literature on the characteristics of social aspects of e-biking, particularly in leisure contexts. Analyzing the literature on e-bike social research is crucial considering e-bikes’ rapid rise in popularity and potential effects on access, inclusion, leisure, and sustainability. As e-bike prevalence and use increases worldwide, it is important to understand what topics characterize the existing e-bike literature, and, particularly in leisure-focused studies, to ascertain where studies may lend insight toward aims of inclusive and sustainable access, and related policy considerations. The Integrated Recreation Amenities Framework (IRAF) provides a conceptual framework for considering this question, as it focuses on the topical, spatial, and temporal scales of outdoor leisure-related activities toward sustainable conditions and explicitly provides an opportunity for emergent and case-specific factors to be considered alongside established ones. In this work, we explore the following: (1) How are e-bikes discussed across disciplines? and (2) How are e-bikes discussed in leisure-focused articles? Using a scoping review approach, we analyzed a corpus of 279 peer-reviewed articles relevant to the social aspects of e-bikes. Primarily using the IRAF for conceptual framing, our results center the geographies and contexts, topical areas, interdisciplinarity, and emergent additional social considerations of e-biking in general and in leisure-specific studies. The results enable us to connect interdisciplinary topic discussions and suggest where foundational and connective studies are warranted. This can inform decision making related to e-bike adoption, encourage multi-scalar thinking, and extend interdisciplinary research.

30 January 2026 in Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TITatiana Iretskaia
Tatiana Iretskaia
DMDaniel C. McCole
Daniel C. McCole
EPElizabeth Perry
Elizabeth Perry

1 January 2021 in Tourism Culture & Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TITatiana Iretskaia
Tatiana Iretskaia