Peng Huang

Mr. Peng Huang

School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WZWeiqing Zhang
Weiqing Zhang
CDChaowei Dong
Chaowei Dong
Peng HuangPeng Huang
Peng Huang
QSQiang Sun
Qiang Sun
Meng LiMeng Li
Meng Li
JCJun Chai
Jun Chai
Coal gangue-based geopolymer (CGGP) is one of the hot spots existing in the recycling of coal gangue resources due to its good comprehensive mechanical properties. However, the coal gangue structure is stable and reactivity is poor, so the coal gangue needs to be activated before utilization. In this paper, the microstructure changes of activated coal gangue by different mechanical and thermal activation methods, as well as the mechanical properties and microstructure changes of the CGGP specimens were studied by experimental investigation. The results indicated that mechanical activation and thermal activation were two effective methods to change the reactivity of coal gangue, which consisted of destroying the stable kaolinite structure and improving the activity of coal gangue. Conversely, part of the amorphous structure in coal gangue was destroyed when the activation temperature reached 900 °C, which was not conducive to the further enhancement of coal gangue activity. For the CGGP prepared by thermally activated coal gangue and modified sodium silicate alkali solution, the uniaxial compressive strength of the CGGP specimens decreased with thermal activation temperatures of the raw coal gangue materials at 700 °C, 800 °C, and 900 °C. The main reason for this was the lower amount of the active metakaolin structure in coal gangue at 900 °C, which was not conducive to the geopolymerization process.

1 May 2017 in Journal of Central South University
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JZJi-Xiong Zhang
Ji-Xiong Zhang
Peng HuangPeng Huang
Peng Huang
QZQiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang
MLMeng Li
Meng Li
ZCZhi-Wei Chen
Zhi-Wei Chen

29 June 2018 in Journal of Geophysics and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Peng HuangPeng Huang
Peng Huang
ASA J S (Sam) Spearing
A J S (Sam) Spearing
JFJu Feng
Ju Feng
KJKashi Vishwanath Jessu
Kashi Vishwanath Jessu
SGShuai Guo
Shuai Guo

1 January 2017 in International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FJFeng Ju
Feng Ju
Peng HuangPeng Huang
Peng Huang
SGShuai Guo
Shuai Guo
MXMeng Xiao
Meng Xiao
LLLixin Lan
Lixin Lan

14 September 2017 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Peng HuangPeng Huang
Peng Huang
FJFeng Ju
Feng Ju
KJKashi Vishwanath Jessu
Kashi Vishwanath Jessu
MXMeng Xiao
Meng Xiao
SGShuai Guo
Shuai Guo
Based on the overburdened structure of shallow coal seams in the West of China, the traditional support resistance method may not apply in such regions due to many roof shear and support crushing accidents. Four support working resistance indexes—rated working resistance, average working resistance, average-partial working resistance, and average-upper working resistance are counted as the candidate working resistance. The method of optimizing and inverting working resistance was put forward based on the roof control effect and working resistance overrun percentage. The simulation of a fully-mechanized top coal caving working face was built by using the UDEC software to analyze the top coal cavability and roof subsidence under different supporting strengths to determine the final working resistance. The project practice of 1322 working face in Jindi coal mine shows that the working resistance is 80–90% of calculated rated working resistance. The hydraulic support is worked under good condition. There is no pillar shrinkage and support crushing during coal mining.

2 January 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Peng HuangPeng Huang
Peng Huang
A.J.S. (Sam) SpearingA.J.S. (Sam) Spearing
A.J.S. (Sam) Spearing
FJFeng Ju
Feng Ju
KJKashi Vishwanath Jessu
Kashi Vishwanath Jessu
ZWZhongwei Wang
Zhongwei Wang
PNPai Ning
Pai Ning
Solid backfill mining as a green mining method has already been successfully applied in many mine sites. Higher requirements for the backfilling materials have been put forward in special regions, such as shallow coal seams, ecologically susceptible areas, and sites with building on the surface. The control effects of common backfilling materials on in situ strata of gob need to be studied and compared to ensure the suitable materials are applied in the mine. The meso-structure, stress variation, energy dissipation, and backfilling effects of the five common solid backfilling materials, which are Aeolian sand, gangue, mineral waste residue, coal ash, and loess are analyzed in this paper. The results show that the Aeolian sand and gangue are densely packed and internally hard when compared to other backfill materials. The deformation of the five materials to absorb the same amount of energy in the order of higher to lower was determined as Aeolian sand, gangue, mineral waste residue, coal ash and loess. The Aeolian sand’s strain energy density is 1.67 times larger than the loess, however, the Aeolian’s strain energy density in front of working face is just 32.2% of the loess, which is important to ensure the safety of the working face. The stress changes were monitored in situ with Aeolian sand and gangue as backfill materials. The monitoring results show that the Aeolian sand stress increase rate is quicker than gangue, which can support the roof effectively.