Under many circumstances, when providing full bus priority methods, urban transport officials have to operate buses in mixed traffic based on their road network limitations. In the case of Istanbul’s Metrobus lane, for instance, when the route comes to the pre-designed Bosphorus Bridge, it has no choice but to merge with highway mixed traffic until it gets to the other side. Much has been written on the relative success of implementing Ramp Metering (RM), for example ALINEA (‘Asservissement line´ aire d’entre´ e autoroutie’) and Variable Speed Limits (VSL), two of the most widely-used “merging congestion” management strategies, in both a separate and combined manner. However, there has been no detailed study regarding the combination of these systems in the face of high bus volume. This being the case, the ultimate goal of this study is to bridge this gap by developing and proposing a combination of VSL and RM strategies in the presence of high bus volume (VSL+ALINEA/B). The proposed model has been coded using microscopic simulation software—VISSIM—and its vehicle actuated programming (VAP) feature; referred to as VisVAP. For current traffic conditions, the proposed model is able to improve total travel time by 9.0%, lower the number of average delays of mixed traffic and buses by 29.1% and 81.5% respectively, increase average speed by 12.7%, boost bottleneck throughout by 2.8%, and lower fuel consumption, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions by 17.3% compared to the existing “VSL+ALINEA” model. The results of the scenario analysis confirmed that the proposed model is not only able to decrease delay times on the Metrobus system but is also able to improve the adverse effects of high bus volume when subject to adjacent mixed traffic flow along highway sections.

Existing public transport (PT) planning methods use a trip-based approach, rather than a user-based approach, leading to neglecting equity. In other words, the impacts of regular users—i.e., users with higher trip rates—are overrepresented during analysis and modelling because of higher trip rates. In contrast to the existing studies, this study aims to show the actual demand characteristic and users’ share are different in daily and monthly data. For this, 1-month of smart card data from the Kocaeli, Turkey, was evaluated by means of specific variables, such as boarding frequency, cardholder types, and the number of users, as well as a breakdown of the number of days traveled by each user set. Results show that the proportion of regular PT users to total users in 1 workday, is higher than the monthly proportion of regular PT users to total users. Accordingly, users who have 16–21 days boarding frequency are 16% of the total users, and yet they have been overrepresented by 39% in the 1-day analysis. Moreover, users who have 1–6 days boarding frequency, have a share of 66% in the 1-month dataset and are underrepresented with a share of 22% in the 1-day analysis. Results indicated that the daily travel data without information related to the day-to-day frequency of trips and PT use caused incorrect estimation of real PT demand. Moreover, user-based analyzing approach over a month prepares the more realistic basis for transportation planning, design, and prioritization of transport investments.

This experimental study evaluated the performance of modified asphalt mixtures prepared by incorporating 2%, 4%, and 6% linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) by weight of asphalt binder through a series of tests. The microstructural analyses using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were conducted on asphalt samples to assess the engineering properties of the asphalt mixes. Finally, ANOVA statistical analysis has been employed to determine the statistical significance of the differences in all tests’ means. Based on laboratory findings, the Marshall stability test result showed that the modified asphalt mixes up to 4% LLDPE had enhanced performance by 12.7% compared to the control mix. A significant decrease (up to 31.3%) in binder penetration was demonstrated due to the incorporation of LLDPE into the asphalt mix. The softening point of the LLDPE–asphalt mixes was increased by up to 17.6%. It was also demonstrated that the incorporation of such LLDPE dosages maintains the flow limits within the specified range; however, the flow of the asphalt mix with 4% LLDPE was 3.17 mm which is the nearest to the average value of the upper and lower acceptable limits. The air voids of mixes with LLDPE content more than 4% by was decreased to less than 4% which is not recommended in high-temperature climates to control mixture bleeding. Microscopic analysis revealed an improvement in the densification of asphalt microstructures, attributed to the LLDPE particles significantly changing the rheology and viscosity of the base mixture and making the hot asphalt mixture more homogeneous. Based on the physical and rheological properties investigated in this study, it could be concluded that 4% LLDPE produces the best performance in asphalt mixtures. Overall, the ANOVA analysis demonstrated that the incorporation of LLDPE into asphalt mixes has a significant impact on all of their properties.

As an emerging technology for sustainable, safe, energy-efficient, and smooth traffic flow, autonomous public transport (APT) has been widely studied in recent years. However, the influence of conventional public transport (CPT) on behavioural intentions toward APT is largely overlooked. While APT is in its nascent phase, users’ choices may be shaped by their perceptions and attitudes toward CPT. Therefore, identifying these perceptions and examining their effect on behavioural intention is crucial. In this study, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is integrated with the satisfaction-loyalty model to analyze the key factors influencing behavioural intentions toward APT. To obtain more precise findings, this study examined public transport by type, including rubber-tired systems, urban rail, and bus rapid transit, rather than as a single mode, unlike many previous studies. A survey (n = 1271) was employed to validate the theoretical model among CPT users in Istanbul. The results indicate that loyalty to CPT significantly influences behavioural intention toward APT. Moreover, users of different CPT types have distinct priorities influencing their intention to use APT. While users of rubber-tired systems prioritize effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions, users of urban rail systems consider social influence, trust and loyalty to CPT to be decisive factors. Furthermore, users of bus rapid transit systems consider performance expectancy, effort expectancy, trust, and loyalty to CPT as key factors influencing their behavioural intention. The findings are expected to enrich theoretical research on behavioural intention toward APT and guide future integration and transition between CPT and APT.

Most of the microscopic traffic simulation programs used today incorporate car-following and lane-change models to simulate driving behaviour across a given area. The main goal of this study has been to develop an automatic calibration process for the parameters of driving behaviour models using metaheuristic algorithms. Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and a combination of GA and PSO (i.e. hybrid GAPSO and hybrid PSOGA) were used during the optimization stage. In order to verify our proposed methodology, a suitable study area with high bus volume on-ramp from the O-1 Highway in Istanbul has been modelled in VISSIM. Traffic data have been gathered through detectors. The calibration procedure has been coded using MATLAB and implemented via the VISSIM-MATLAB COM interface. Using the proposed methodology, the results of the calibrated model showed that hybrid GAPSO and hybrid PSOGA techniques outperformed the GA-only and PSO-only techniques during the calibration process. Thus, both are recommended for use in the calibration of microsimulation traffic models, rather than GA-only and PSO-only techniques.

Minimizing intersection delays is an important challenge in today’s smart cities. Even there are different approaches for delay minimization most of them uses the same nonlinear delay formula defined by Highway Capacity Manual (US). As a result choosing a fast and precise algorithm for finding the optimum inputs minimizing the delay output is a critical decision. In this paper we share our experience in selection of best optimization algorithm as a part of our work of developing an innovative system to minimize person delays in intersections. We compared two best known algorithms: Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). It is shown that using the same population size and number of iterations PSO is 7x faster and 17x more precise than GA.