Luis Segovia Guerrero

Mr. Luis Segovia Guerrero

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuis Segovia Guerrero
Luis Segovia Guerrero
NBNuria Baladés
Nuria Baladés
JGJuan J. Gallardo-Galán
Juan J. Gallardo-Galán
AMAntonio José Gil Mena
Antonio José Gil Mena
David L. SalesDavid L. Sales
David L. Sales
In the context of growing environmental concerns and the demand for more sustainable manufacturing practices, this study evaluates the environmental and economic performance of two production routes for a stainless steel support block used in steel mills. A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) were conducted to assess a conventional subtractive manufacturing process based on Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machining versus a hybrid approach that combines Plasma Arc-Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (PA-WAAM) with CNC finishing. The LCA was carried out using ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint and Endpoint methodologies in SimaPro, while the LCC employed a cradle-to-gate cost model. Results showed that the hybrid WAAM-CNC route reduced average environmental impacts by 49% across 18 categories and decreased steel consumption by approximately 70% due to near-net-shape fabrication. Although the hybrid method incurred an approximate 3.5 times increase in unit production cost, this was primarily attributed to equipment investment. In contrast, operational costs such as labor, materials, and consumables were significantly lower—by 66%, 28%, and 45%, respectively. These findings support the hybrid approach as a more sustainable manufacturing alternative with the potential for long-term cost optimization as additive technologies mature.

17 April 2024 in Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LGLuis Segovia Guerrero
Luis Segovia Guerrero
NBNuria Baladés
Nuria Baladés
BABonnie Attard
Bonnie Attard
MNMaría De Nicolás
María De Nicolás
ASAmérico Scotti
Américo Scotti
David L. SalesDavid L. Sales
David L. Sales

4 June 2024 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAntonio José Gil Mena
Antonio José Gil Mena
ABAbderraouf Bouakkaz
Abderraouf Bouakkaz
Jose M. Abelleira-PereiraJose M. Abelleira-Pereira
Jose M. Abelleira-Pereira
LGLuis Segovia Guerrero
Luis Segovia Guerrero
MRMaría de la Luz Martín Rodríguez
María de la Luz Martín Rodríguez

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuis Segovia Guerrero
Luis Segovia Guerrero
AMAntonio José Gil Mena
Antonio José Gil Mena
NBNuria Baladés
Nuria Baladés
David L. SalesDavid L. Sales
David L. Sales
CFCarlota Fonollá
Carlota Fonollá
MMMaría de Nicolás Morillas
María de Nicolás Morillas
This study investigated the influence of printing parameters and strategies on the morphological characteristics of austenitic stainless steel beads deposited on carbon steel substrates, using plasma directed energy deposition (DED). The experimental setup varied the welding current, wire feed speed, and torch travel speed, and we analyzed three printing strategies: simple-linear, overlapping, and oscillating. Moreover, advanced 3D scanning and computational analysis were used to assess the key morphological features, including bead width and height. The results showed that the computational model developed by using parabolic assumptions accurately predicted the geometric outcomes of the overlapping beads. The oscillating printing strategy was the one that showed improved morphological uniformity and bead substrate wettability, so these features were used for multi-layer component manufacturing. The use of equivalent wavelength–amplitude values resulted in maximum combinations of bead height and width. Moreover, cost-effective carbon steel substrates were feasibly used in microstructural and elemental analyses, with the latter ones confirming the alignment of the bead composition with the wire-fed material. Overall, this study provides practical insights for optimizing plasma DED processes, thus enhancing the efficiency and quality of metal component manufacturing.

26 June 2025 in Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuis Segovia Guerrero
Luis Segovia Guerrero
NBNuria Baladés
Nuria Baladés
CGCarmen Garrido García
Carmen Garrido García
AMAntonio José Gil Mena
Antonio José Gil Mena
SVSevero Raúl Fernández Vidal
Severo Raúl Fernández Vidal
David L. SalesDavid L. Sales
David L. Sales
Directed energy deposition process needs a substrate, as a base for depositing layers of material, which is discarded after manufacturing. This study showed the feasibility of incorporating a substrate into the final product to reduce material waste and energy. For this purpose, double sided walls-substrate austenitic stainless steel structures were produced by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). To assess the viability of this approach, mechanical tests such as tensile, hardness, and impact flexure tests were conducted on printed specimens, which were extracted through electrical discharge machining. This was completed with a fractographic analysis of the tested samples. A metallographic analysis was also performed both to assess the internal structure and to evaluate the effects of substrate integration on mechanical properties, thus showing various structural transitions across the bead-substrate interface, including the presence of vermicular and skeletal ferrite within an austenitic matrix. An EDX analysis showed chemical composition variations across the interface. Additionally, energy and cost assessments showed an 8% reduction in material usage, an 8.7% reduction in manufacturing time and an 8.4% reduction in energy consumption and associated $$\hbox {CO}_2$$ CO 2 emissions through substrate integration. The results confirmed the feasibility of integrating substrates into WAAM-fabricated components while maintaining mechanical characteristics within the expected range for stainless steel structures.