Background: Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication and an obstacle to treatment, with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. There is still no global consensus or standard guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with PVTT. Increasing evidence suggests that more aggressive treatment modalities, including transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and various combination therapies, may improve the prognosis and prolong the survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) patients with PVTT. We aim to comprehensively review and compare the efficacy and safety of these advanced options for aHCC with PVTT.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE for phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating multimodality treatments for aHCC with PVTT. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were constructed to retrieve individual patient-level data to strengthen the comparison of the benefits of all multimodality treatments of interest. Each study was pooled in a fixed-effects network meta-analysis (NMA). We also conducted subgroup analyses using risk ratios extracted from each study, including viral etiology, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, macrovascular invasion or portal vein tumor thrombosis, and extrahepatic spread. Multimodality treatments were ranked using SUCRA scores.Results: We identified 15 randomized controlled trials with 16 multimodality regimens that met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 5,236 patients with OS results and 5,160 patients with PFS results were included in the analysis. The hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (HAIC-FO) showed OS and PFS benefits over all the other therapies. In terms of OS, HAIC-FO, nivolumab, and TACE+Len were superior to sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donatinib monotherapies, as well as HAIC-FO+Sor. In terms of PFS, TACE+Len showed better benefits than lenvatinib, donatinib, and tremelimumab+durvalumab. A low heterogeneity (I² < 50%) and consistency were observed. The SUCRA score for OS ranked HAIC-FO+sorafenib as the best treatment option among all multimodality treatments in hepatitis B, MVI, or PVTT with EHS and AFP 400 μg/L subgroups.Conclusion: HAIC-FO and HAIC-FO+sorafenib are statistically better options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with PVTT among the multimodality treatments, and their effective and safe implementation may provide the best outcomes for HCC-PVTT patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the risks of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism related to gynecological cancers. Population-based retrospective cohort study. We conducted a cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to explore hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism associated with site-specific gynecologic cancers in women from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2018. The examined gynecologic cancers included endometrial (EC), uterine corpus cancer (UC), and ovarian cancer (OC). The incidence and hazard ratios were quantified using Cox proportional hazards models. The incidence of developing gynecological (Gyn) cancers in the hyperthyroid and hypothyroid women was 0.29 and 0.44 per 1000 person-years, which was 0.86 fold lower and 1.13 fold higher than that in the comparison cohort (p < 0.001). Compared with patients aged 20–40 years, patients in older age groups had a lower and higher risk of developing Gyn cancers (for hyperthyroid, 40–65 years: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.82; > 65 years: aHR = 0.94; for hypothyroid, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.26; > 65 years: aHR = 1.38). Compared with the non-hypothyroid women and non-hyperthyroid women beyond 6 years of follow-up, hypothyroid and hyperthyroid women showed decreased risk of Gyn cancers. Medication treatment for hyperthyroid and hypothyroid disease did not showed significant association in subgroup analyses (aHR = 0.99 and 0.80, respectively). Our results show that women with hyperthyroidism have a significantly reduced risk of gynecological cancers, whereas women with hypothyroidism have a slightly increased risk of gynecological cancers suggesting an association between thyroid function level and risk of gynecological cancers.

The routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) is not recommended for the prevention or treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia or febrile neutropenia because risks associated with certain types of cancers, distant organ metastases, and primary tumor growth cannot be excluded. We examined the association between GCSF use and the incidence of brain metastasis (BM), as well as BM-free survival (BMFS). This retrospective cohort study included 121 stage IV breast cancer patients without confirmed BM at the time of diagnosis and who received at least one course of systematic chemotherapy or target therapy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2022. The effect of GCSF use on BM was assessed with other confounding factors in Cox regression analyses. In this retrospective cohort, patients who received GCSF treatment had a significantly higher incidence of BM than those who did not (34.9% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.011). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that GCSF use, menopause status, hormone treatment, HER2 treatment, cumulative dosage, dosage density, and neutropenia were independent risk factors for BMFS (p < 0.05). GCSF users had a higher risk of BM (adjusted HR: 2.538; 95% CI: 1.127–5.716, p = 0.025) than nonusers. BM risk was significantly associated with those with neutropenia (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.80) but not with those without neutropenia (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41–0.84, Interaction p-value < 0.05). The higher the dose density of GCSF, the higher the risk compared with those who do not use GCSF (p for trend < 0.01). These preliminary results suggest that GCSF is associated with BM in patients with stage IV breast cancer who did not have BM at initial diagnosis. Further comprehensively designed large-scale observational studies are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

Background: Melasma is a chronic, relapsing pigmented skin disease with challenging and unsatisfactory treatment outcomes. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatments for melasma. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) for melasma treatment modalities between January 2022 and January 2025. Relative efficacy refers to the comparison of the improvement in melasma severity before and after treatment for all modalities of interest at a specific time point. The Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) (also known as modified MASI (mMASI) or half-MASI score) was defined as the efficacy index. Safety refers to the incidence of the most common adverse events. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the GRADE method. Results: The analysis included 14 clinical trials with 15 treatment modalities involving 738 women who met the inclusion criteria. The mean difference in efficacy index showed that intradermal PRP (platelet-rich plasma) and intradermal PRP + oTXA (oral tranexamic acid) were the best treatment options compared with HQ4%, intradermal TXA, intradermal PRGF (plasma rich in growth factor) + HQ4 (hydroquinone 4%), followed by intradermal TXALaser (intradermal TXA + Q-switched fractional 1064-nmNd:YAG lasers). The efficacy indices of other modalities were comparable. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild, were well tolerated, or resolved with treatment. The quality of evidence was generally high. Conclusions: This NMA showed that intradermal PRP in combination or alone is an effective and safe treatment option for melasma. PRP may be a direction for the development of new melasma treatment options in the future, but well-designed, comprehensive, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to verify it.

Background and Objectives: The relationship between pregnancy complications and the risk of gynecological and breast cancer remains inconclusive, with limited research available. This study aimed to determine whether pregnancy complications, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), large for gestational age (LGA), or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are associated with the development of endometrial cancer (EC), ovarian cancer (OC), or breast cancer (BC). Materials and Methods: This was a population-based case–control study linked to the National Health Insurance Research Database from 2008 to 2020, using ICD codes to identify parous gynecological cases (n = 6714). The propensity score matching method was used to match control groups (n = 1,153,346). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between EC, OC, BC risk and pregnancy complications. Results: In adjusted multivariable logistic regression models, women with a history of preeclampsia did not have a significantly increased risk of endometrial, ovarian, or breast cancer compared to controls. Although women with GDM complications had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, the increased risk of EC or OC was not significant. The risk of BC in women with a history of IUGR or LGA was not significant, whereas risk statistics for EC or OC in women with a history of IUGR or LGA could not be shown because of the small sample size. Conclusions: GDM is associated with BC risk. Future studies should aim to determine whether there is a causal relationship. Therefore, cancer screening is warranted in women with GDM.

Objective: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) compared with single-agent chemotherapy of the physician’s choice (TPC) from the perspective of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to assess outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Clinical data were derived from the ASCENT trial, while direct medical costs were obtained from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA). Utility values were taken from published literature. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine parameter uncertainty and test the robustness of the results. Results: In the base-case analysis, SG was associated with an incremental cost of USD 121,836 per QALY gained—exceeding Taiwan’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of USD 102,120. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that SG drug cost was the primary driver of ICER variability. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that reducing the price of SG by 50% increased the likelihood of cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: From the NHIA perspective, SG is not cost-effective for patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC at its current price. Substantial price reductions would be required for SG to become cost-effective under the WTP threshold of USD 102,120 per QALY.