Background: Melasma is a chronic, relapsing pigmented skin disease with challenging and unsatisfactory treatment outcomes. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatments for melasma. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) for melasma treatment modalities between January 2022 and January 2025. Relative efficacy refers to the comparison of the improvement in melasma severity before and after treatment for all modalities of interest at a specific time point. The Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) (also known as modified MASI (mMASI) or half-MASI score) was defined as the efficacy index. Safety refers to the incidence of the most common adverse events. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the GRADE method. Results: The analysis included 14 clinical trials with 15 treatment modalities involving 738 women who met the inclusion criteria. The mean difference in efficacy index showed that intradermal PRP (platelet-rich plasma) and intradermal PRP + oTXA (oral tranexamic acid) were the best treatment options compared with HQ4%, intradermal TXA, intradermal PRGF (plasma rich in growth factor) + HQ4 (hydroquinone 4%), followed by intradermal TXALaser (intradermal TXA + Q-switched fractional 1064-nmNd:YAG lasers). The efficacy indices of other modalities were comparable. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild, were well tolerated, or resolved with treatment. The quality of evidence was generally high. Conclusions: This NMA showed that intradermal PRP in combination or alone is an effective and safe treatment option for melasma. PRP may be a direction for the development of new melasma treatment options in the future, but well-designed, comprehensive, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to verify it.

Background and Objectives: The relationship between pregnancy complications and the risk of gynecological and breast cancer remains inconclusive, with limited research available. This study aimed to determine whether pregnancy complications, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), large for gestational age (LGA), or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are associated with the development of endometrial cancer (EC), ovarian cancer (OC), or breast cancer (BC). Materials and Methods: This was a population-based case–control study linked to the National Health Insurance Research Database from 2008 to 2020, using ICD codes to identify parous gynecological cases (n = 6714). The propensity score matching method was used to match control groups (n = 1,153,346). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between EC, OC, BC risk and pregnancy complications. Results: In adjusted multivariable logistic regression models, women with a history of preeclampsia did not have a significantly increased risk of endometrial, ovarian, or breast cancer compared to controls. Although women with GDM complications had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, the increased risk of EC or OC was not significant. The risk of BC in women with a history of IUGR or LGA was not significant, whereas risk statistics for EC or OC in women with a history of IUGR or LGA could not be shown because of the small sample size. Conclusions: GDM is associated with BC risk. Future studies should aim to determine whether there is a causal relationship. Therefore, cancer screening is warranted in women with GDM.

The routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) is not recommended for the prevention or treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia or febrile neutropenia because risks associated with certain types of cancers, distant organ metastases, and primary tumor growth cannot be excluded. We examined the association between GCSF use and the incidence of brain metastasis (BM), as well as BM-free survival (BMFS). This retrospective cohort study included 121 stage IV breast cancer patients without confirmed BM at the time of diagnosis and who received at least one course of systematic chemotherapy or target therapy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2022. The effect of GCSF use on BM was assessed with other confounding factors in Cox regression analyses. In this retrospective cohort, patients who received GCSF treatment had a significantly higher incidence of BM than those who did not (34.9% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.011). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that GCSF use, menopause status, hormone treatment, HER2 treatment, cumulative dosage, dosage density, and neutropenia were independent risk factors for BMFS (p < 0.05). GCSF users had a higher risk of BM (adjusted HR: 2.538; 95% CI: 1.127–5.716, p = 0.025) than nonusers. BM risk was significantly associated with those with neutropenia (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.80) but not with those without neutropenia (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41–0.84, Interaction p-value < 0.05). The higher the dose density of GCSF, the higher the risk compared with those who do not use GCSF (p for trend < 0.01). These preliminary results suggest that GCSF is associated with BM in patients with stage IV breast cancer who did not have BM at initial diagnosis. Further comprehensively designed large-scale observational studies are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

IntroductionThe cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy (CT) and drug wastage in treating platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) was assessed.MethodsA three-state partitioned-survival model to compare the clinical and economic outcomes in the treatment of patients with PRrOC from a Taiwan healthcare prospective, extrapolated to two years based on data obtained from the JGOG3023 clinical trial. The primary outcomes of the model were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).ResultsIn the base-case scenario, using vials of bevacizumab biosimilar (Bevbiol) plus chemotherapy, the ICER was (new Taiwan dollar) NT$ 4,555,878 per QALY gained. The incremental cost savings of an incremental 2.02 QALYs were NT$ 1,605,828 if weight-based Bevbiol plus chemotherapy were used, but the ICER remained high at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. If the cost of Bevbiol were reduced to 50% per vial, adding it to CT would be cost-effective at an acceptable WTP threshold of NTD 2,994,200, with an ICER of NT$ 2,975,484.ConclusionsBevacizumab biosimilars in mg/kg dosage form with chemotherapy are still not cost-effective in Taiwan, but using weight-based dosing will reduce drug waste and save treatment costs.

Objective: Radiotherapy remodels the tumor microenvironment (TME) and may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer treatment, particularly in patients with large, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated by portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Because of these unique effects, a growing body of research has found that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors has a synergistic impact on unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) larger than 5 cm in diameter. We aim to explore the efficacy of these treatment modalities through a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods and Analysis: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of different SBRT-based treatment modalities for large advanced HCCs with PVTT (tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm), with primary endpoints including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3–4 severe adverse events (SAEs). Results: Eighteen studies comprising 2303 patients were included. SBRT combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (SBRT + TACE) demonstrated significantly superior overall survival compared with other monotherapy or combination strategies. Most other treatment regimens showed comparable PFS outcomes. Notably, SBRT alone and SBRT combined with PD 1 inhibitors (SBRT + PD 1) were associated with significantly lower incidences of severe adverse events compared with other treatment modalities; all of these reported SAEs were manageable with appropriate clinical intervention. Conclusions: For patients with large (≥5 cm) advanced HCC with PVTT, SBRT combined with TACE was associated with superior OS and PFS compared with other treatment strategies. These findings suggest potential synergistic interactions between SBRT and TACE or immunotherapy. Further high-quality prospective trials are warranted to validate these observations and clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms. Our results provide evidence to inform therapeutic decision-making in advanced HCC.

Background: We aimed to compare 7 newer immunotherapies and targeted therapies for platinum-resistant relapsed ovarian cancer. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases for phase III trials involving platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy in combination with chemotherapy. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the GRADE method. The primary outcome of comparison was progression-free survival, and secondary outcomes included overall survival and safety. Results: This analysis included 7 randomized phase III controlled trials, encompassing 2485 PRrOC patients. Combining bevacizumab plus chemotherapy and lurbinectedin demonstrated statistically significant differences in progression-free survival compared to all other regimens of interest. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the overall survival. Nivolumab and mirvetuximab exhibited fewer serious adverse events than the other regimens of interest. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and lurbinectedin monotherapy has significant efficacy in patients with PRrOC. For patients with PRrOC who have exhausted treatment options, nivolumab and mirvetuximab may be considered as alternatives because of their better safety profiles.